The Slav's Baseball Blog - BASEBALL 24-7-365 The Slav's Blog about anything relating to the great game of baseball - and other less important issues from outside the diamond. The best baseball blog that you have never heard of.
Pages
▼
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
With Liberty and Drug Tests, FOR ALL!!!
This from the Daily Herald. St. Viator, a suburban Chicago school is instituting a drug testing program for ALL students. WHAT A CONCEPT.
If combating drug use among youths is as strong a public policy concern as some of the hysterical ramblings we've heard lately regarding Performance Enhancing Drugs indicate it is, then we should be concerned about and combat drug abuse amongst all students equally. PERIOD.
To do otherwise indicates we are only concerned about athletes harming themselves, and not the chess club. This gives the kids who would normally succumb to peer pressure to use drugs, to be able to say, "Thanks, but if I fail the drug test, my mom won't get me a car for graduation" or whatever.
Besides, high school is supposed to be preparing kids to be productive members of the workforce and many companies today require you to produce a sample or two here and there. Although, they don't test the guy in sales after he lands a big contract for PED's now that I think about it. Not a perfect world, I guess.
St. Viator to drug-test all students in fall
BY SHEILA AHERN
sahern@dailyherald.com
Next fall, St. Viator High School students will map out routes to new classes, memorize locker combos and shop for a homecoming outfit.
This year, they can add this to the autumn back-to-school rituals: a drug test.
The 20-member St. Viator Board of Trustees has unanimously approved a new drug policy where each student will be drug-tested using a strand of hair.
Every student will be tested in the first six weeks of school, and 20 will be randomly tested weekly for the rest of the year, said the Rev. Robert Egan, president of St. Viator.
I bet this will bring back shorter haircuts amongst the boys. The only concern I would have doing it this way is if using hair samples provides a history of drug use that goes back years into the students past.
Each test costs $45. The school has budgeted $65,000 to $75,000 for the drug tests for the 2007-08 school year.
St. Viator now randomly tests for drugs only members of the boys football and hockey teams. A drug dog also visits five times a year, and random students are picked for breathalyzer tests at school dances, Egan said.
Hair samples will be tested for cocaine, opiates, PCP, marijuana, amphetamines and Ecstasy, whose use within 90 days of the test can be detected. It does not detect steroids or alcohol.
A student who refuses to be tested will be kicked out, Egan said.
The faculty and staff will not be tested.
An increasing number of schools are drug-testing athletes or those in other extracurricular activities. According to the National School Boards Association, about 5 percent of school districts drug-test athletes and 2 percent test for extracurricular activities.
In Antioch-Lake Villa High School District 117, students participating in extracurricular activities and those seeking parking permits are drug-tested.
Barker said St. Viator's tactic "seems extreme" and likens it to plopping a metal detector at a high school's front door: It primarily, he says, instills fear and suspicion in the community.
But the program is seen as a huge success at St. Patrick High School in Chicago. Since 2004, the school has spent $60,000 yearly to drug-test every student. Each year, less than 1 percent tests positive for drugs, said school spokesman Chris Nelson.
"The parents couldn't be happier," he said.
Across the nation, drug-testing high-schoolers has become increasingly popular in the past five or six years, said Ed Yohnka, a spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union.
Most policies don't last more than a year, he said.
"It give these kids a way out," she said. "It's a better excuse than, 'My mom will kill me.'æ"
• Daily Herald staff writer Erin Holmes contributed to this report.
A-Rod and His Gal Pal
FROM TODAY'S NEW YORK POST:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/05302007/news/regionalnews/hes_a_yankee_doodle_randy_regionalnews_dan_mangan.htm
By DAN MANGAN
May 30, 2007 -- Yankees superstar Alex Rodriguez stepped up to the plate with a mysterious, busty blonde in Toronto, as these intimate, exclusive photos reveal.
Cynthia Rodriguez - A-Rod's wife and mother of their 2 1/2-year-old daughter, Natasha - was nowhere to be seen during the slugger's big night out on the town, which occurred the evening before the last-place Bronx Bombers' pathetic 7-2 loss to the Toronto Blue Jays.
And it came as Rodriguez took a room at Toronto's Four Seasons hotel - down the street from the Park Hyatt, where most, if not all of his Yankee teammates and coaches are staying during a three-game stint that ends tonight.
C'mon, his wife would have just been a third wheel, besides she doesn't like blondes.
Wait a minute, he doesn't stay with his teammates? Who does this guy think he is, Roger Clemens. He probably doesn't want Jeter to steal another girlfriend from him.
"No comment," Rodriguez said when The Post asked him about his north-of-the-border jaunt with the blonde.
Yankees spokesman Jason Zillo said A-Rod has "never commented on his personal or private life, and he's not going to start now."
Right, just like his other nasty habits like not hitting in the clutch, NOT playing on a World Series winner, WHY START COMMENTING ON STUFF NOW? Just cram all those skeletons into a big closet marked "Alex's Screw Ups".
Rodriguez went 0-for-3 last night in the Yanks' 3-2 loss to the Blue Jays.
A-Rod started his busy Sunday in The Bronx, where the Yankees dropped a third straight game to the Los Angeles Angels.
At least the night wasn't a total washout. A size three collar and a waiting Hummer (He drives a Hummer, right?). That's a decent day at the park.
Rodriguez, who was wearing his wedding band, was casually dressed in jeans and a white, short-sleeved T-shirt featuring a large fleur-de-lis on its left arm. His tight-bodied, bleach-blonde gal pal was clad in a snug pair of blue jeans, a shiny, light T-shirt and wedge-heeled shoes.
See, he was wearing his wedding band. That means anything that happened is OK. These creeps in the media make me sick. Fleur-de-lis? Not very manly, but when you're A-Rod, you can pull shit like this off.
Home to what one Web site calls, "Toronto's most beautiful all-nude dancers," the Brass Rail is known for its booming sound system, overflowing crowds, overpriced beers and $20 lap dances - a drop in the bucket for Rodriguez, who has a 10-year contract worth $252 million.
Over-priced beers? But apparently very reasonably priced lap dances (no editorial). And the third baseman is no bargain at those prices either, pal. This writer has his priorities in place, huh?
Rodriguez and the blonde spent an hour or so at the Brass Rail, the witness said.
When they walked out of there, A-Rod and the woman were alone.
Those Rodriguez flunkies know when to make themselves scarce. They'd have spent more time at the bar but Alex is young and not very skilled in the art of conversation and the sexual tension it can create. Plus, he doesn't speak Canadian very well and his posse didn;t have a American-to-Canadian thesauraus.
They then got a cab back to the Four Seasons. Their cab pulled up to the hotel minutes after midnight.
Right before the beefy-armed bitch would have turned into a pumpkin. Good thing those dumb-f**ks were on Canadian time or A-Rod would have been wiping pumpkin seeds off his genitalia. Sucks when that happens.
A-Rod then strode into the hotel behind her. He rubbed his nose as if to obscure his face to other people as he joined her at the elevator bank.
As the doors to an elevator opened, he and the blonde got in together, the witness said.
The doors then closed, and they disappeared upstairs.
Yes, he strode the smug, purposeful stride of a stallion who just knew he was moments away from mounting his filly. Actually, he rubbed a different body part and did the F-you dance for the pathetic paparazzi, but they couldn't print those details in the New York Post, they have standards and journalistic integrity and junk.
Alas, we may never fully know what happened after those two hormonally charged hunks disappeared into the night, but if nine months from now, she pops out a tight-bodied, green eyed little muffin with GQ good looks, in a shiny shirt with a propensity for choking in the clutch, I guess we'll be able to connect the dots.
Good Luck in Divorce Court, what's 1/2 of $252 Million?
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
Friday, May 25, 2007
Teen Golfer's Mother Dies from Cancer
Really a sad story from the world of sports. Hopefully, many other lives will be saved from early detection of this and other cancers that are manageable and treatable if caught in the early stages. It was good to see that she fought long enough and hard enough to see her daughter play at that level. Puts things in perspective.
Excerpts from espn.com
http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=2882571
Kelly Jo Dowd dies after long battle with cancer
Kelly Jo Dowd, a cancer-stricken mother whose dream of seeing her teen daughter Dakoda play in an LPGA event was realized last spring, has died. She was 42.
She spent years battling breast cancer, which her family said spread to her bones and liver, and then to her brain in the final months of her life. She died Thursday night at her home in Palm Harbor, Fla., with her daughter and other relatives at her side.
Kelly Jo Dowd's dream was to see Dakoda play in an LPGA event.
Her death came just over a year after seeing her daughter play in the Ginn Open in Reunion, Fla., when Dakoda, then 13, and her family went public with their story, even knowing Kelly Jo's death was expected. Shortly before the tournament, the family was told Kelly Jo would have only a few months to live.
Dakoda Dowd, one of the nation's top-ranked junior golfers, was invited to play in the 2006 tournament by Ginn Resorts president and CEO Bobby Ginn, who lauded the Dowds Friday as "a special family whose story touched a nation."
"I'm prouder today than I was yesterday that my daughter has the courage and strength to play with these LPGA professionals," Kelly Jo said after that tournament. "And I feel great right now. I feel great. My dream came true out here."
The Dowd family chose to tell their story with hopes that Kelly Jo's plight -- she ignored a lump for several months before being diagnosed with breast cancer -- would be a strong reminder that women should be vigilant in doing self-exams and getting checked regularly.
"I did something pretty stupid," Kelly Jo said in a 2006 interview with the AP. "And the only way that I can let myself feel better about it is if I know that people can learn from our situation."
"We're not going to run away from this," he said. "We're going to glorify her and do her proud."
Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press
NBA Numbers Confirm Bias in Officiating
That's BIAS, not RACISM. BIAS. There is a difference.
So now Commissioner Stern can apologize to the authors of the original study and admit he was wrong about their work. And Charles Barkley can eat his rather strong words railing against the original study. I know Sir Charles can eat, so this should be a slam dunk.
Unfortunately, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for either of the two events to occur. Both guys are stubborn and strong willed and both apparently think they are never wrong. Although in Commissioner Stern's defense, I still think he was right about the Phoenix Suns suspension fiasco. If the players don't react as they did, Horry gets suspended all by his lonesome.
I'm not sure you have to get up from the bench to defend your teammate after he does a dive worthy of an Oscar. Now, if they had stepped onto the court while holding up their cards grading the dive like they used to do in the Olympics, or in the slam dunk events, I'd cut them some slack. But getting up to heighten the tension and elevate the testosterone level a couple of notches, put them in time-out every GD time.
CASE CLOSED.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=2870260
Even NBA study might confirm racial bias in officiating
By Lester Munson
The Wharton School professor whose study started a controversy about possible racial bias in foul calls in the NBA has now seen the NBA's own data about its officiating, and is more convinced than ever that he's right.
"Their own study agrees with our conclusion: A referee is more likely to blow the whistle and call a foul against a player of another race," Justin Wolfers said after he reviewed the information in work done by an NBA contractor.
The league initially had refused to allow Wolfers to examine its study, but finally sent it to him last week after a series of blistering criticisms of Wolfers and his work.
Responding to Wolfers' conclusions that officials were guilty of "own-race bias" in enough foul calls to affect the outcomes of games, a league spokesman said that Wolfers was "wrong," that he was "disingenuous" and that his work was "sloppy and ludicrous." Commissioner David Stern and league president Joel Litvin attacked Wolfers in numerous broadcast appearances.
"After refusing my requests for weeks, the NBA was unexpectedly gracious enough to share its material with me," Wolfers said. "And I am now able to say that their critical statements are contradicted by the league consultant's own statistical output."
It's academic, yes. But it just might be correct that a racial bias exists in NBA officiating.
"I believe they were tired of the criticism that they had not given it to us," he said. "And I don't think they really knew what their study said."
An independent analysis of the two conflicting studies requested by ESPN.com confirms Wolfers' findings that referees favor their own race when they blow their whistles. Thomas Miles, who has a Ph. D. in economics from the University of Chicago and is a graduate of Harvard Law School, dissected the massive study completed by Wolfers, and compared it with the smaller study by an NBA consultant.
An NBA spokesman declined to respond to Miles' observations.
"It's done. It's over. We have nothing to add to what we have said already," the spokesman said.
"It is remarkable how [Wolfers] was able to use the NBA's own data set and show that it supported what he said at the beginning," Miles said. Wolfers used the NBA's own categories of minutes played in his response to the NBA's study, and showed that there is evidence of discrimination even with the NBA's own data.
Lester Munson is a Chicago journalist and lawyer who has been reporting on investigative and legal issues in the sports industry for 18 years.
Thursday, May 24, 2007
Elijah Dukes of Hazzard
From the St. Pete Times comes this disturbing update on Devil Rays Elijah Dukes. Dukes seems determined to prove the old adage, about the apple not falling far from the tree, to be true.
Dukes, who grew up in Sulphur Springs, saw his father convicted of second-degree murder when he was 11. Elijah Dukes Sr. received a 20-year prison sentence for shooting a man who sold his wife $100 worth of fake crack cocaine.
Imagine you find this text message photo on your cell phone from your estranged husband and the father of your children:
And this voice message to complement the picture:
"You dead, dawg," says an angry voice. "I ain't even bulls-------. Your kids, too."
"Hey, dawg. It's on, dawg. You dead, dawg. I ain't even bulls-------. Your kids too, dawg. It don't even matter to me who is in the car with you. N-----, all I know is, n-----, when I see your m-----f------- a-- riding, dawg, it's on. As a matter of fact, I'm coming to your m-----f------ house."
This quote is also disturbing if it's true, because it show the mind-set that perpetuates the behavior:
"He's trying to act like he's made a change," Gilbert said. "He's made no changes. He's gotten worse. He says that since he plays baseball, 'No one can f--- with me.'"
And this is why the Rays continue to stick with him:
Dukes, who makes the major-league minimum $380,000, is considered one of the best all-around athletes on the Rays, with a mix of speed and power that some scouts predict could make him one of the game's top players.
Unfortunately, Mr. Dukes seems more determined to make paternalistic history, as well as domestic violence history, than baseball history. To further enchance this young charmers character resume, we find these further details:
Four women have gone to court seeking child support from Dukes. In all four cases, the court found Dukes was the father, meaning he has at least five children by four women. Two of those women were pregnant at the same time, giving birth in 2003 within eight days of each other.
Fast Facts:
Elijah Dukes' children
Date of birth Mother Gender
Nov. 25, 2003 NiShea Gilbert boy
Dec. 3, 2003 Carla Bryant girl
June 7, 2004 Shantell Mitchell boy
June 16, 2005 NiShea Gilbert girl
July 19, 2006 Porcia Daniels girl
The complete story is available here:
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/05/23/Tampabay/Ballplayer_s_wife__He.shtml
Ballplayer's wife: He threatened me, kids
Rays' Elijah Dukes is under a restraining order - again.
By EDUARDO ENCINA and ABBIE VANSICKLE
Published May 23, 2007
But the question is: "How long are the Devil Rays, an organization that seems to be as littered with players of questionable character and behavior as it is with losses, willing to tolerate this sort of behavior from someone that represents the community, the organization and Major League Baseball?"
Where is Roger Goodell when you need him? Can we get a table for two for Mr. Dukes and Mr. Lastings Milledge of the Mets at the next MLB conduct policy meeting? What, they don't have one? Take a page from the NFL, Mr. Selig, if you really care about the fans perception of the "integrity of the game". Integrity and character is displayed by how you conduct yourself when others aren't looking (or you believe that to be the case). These guys are proven failures.
Milledge has had conduct issues going back to high school, the stupidity of releasing a rap song laced with the content he chose at this time, reeks of blatant stupidity.
Trade value reduced to zero, with the Devil Rays exception thrown in.
If this type of story continues, I propose that at the next relocation and contraction discussions that Major League Baseball has, consider transferring the Devil Rays franchise, not to Orlando, but instead to the Florida Correctional League.
It should save them on travel costs.
CHARACTER COUNTS.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
The One and Only Dr. Mike Marshall
MIKE MARSHALL - ONE OF THE TOP RELIEVERS OF HIS ERA:
DR. MIKE MARSHALL TODAY:
There was a great feature article this week on the man who I consider the best pitching coach in the country bar none, Dr. Mike Marshall, by Jeff Passan at Yahoo Sports.
Dr. Marshall believes that Sir Isaac Newton may in fact be the greatest pitching coach who ever lived, but you have to dig through his FREE on-line book to find out why.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=Apk10uwj8nzz0lVh14FxK3w5nYcB?slug=jp-marshall051007&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
I've been to the Marshall Training Facility in Zephyrhills on a couple of occasions and Dr. Mike has always been open and accessible to coaches and players. Those that see the training methods first-hand and the impact it has on pitchers cannot help but come away impressed, and at times, awed. His guys always have lights out stuff, a great variety and quality of breaking pitches.
I recall on one occasion I visited and witnessed Jeff Sparks throwing the 15 lb. iron ball into the rebound wall as if it was a baseball or a softball. There was no hump-back trajectory, He was throwing from some distance away from the wall (most of the trainees work out close to the wall) and there was plenty of heat on the the throw. I believe they were shooting a feature for one of MLB's highlight shows. I never saw the show run live, but it was an awesome display of power pitching.
His methods are not accepted by the mainstream pitching gurus or major league baseball and that may be a good thing. MLB's track record of arm injuries amongst pitchers in their care and custody is historically bad and seemingly getting worse. It may only trail the collective record of the so-called pitching gurus who combined have not injured anybody "according to their records", but have presided over a nationwide epidemic of youth arm injuries.
I recall when I visited the complex for the first time, a young Mark Prior was blazing through the major leagues, with the mere mention of his name eliciting gushing comments regarding his perfect mechanics and impending injury-free, Hall of Fame career. Guaranteed. You couldn't get coaches to drool more if you had Pamela Anderson show up in a thong.
Tom House's computer told him Prior was perfect, and House came down from his mountain top to tell all of us coaches, so goodness gracious, it had to be true. At that time, Dr. Mike was answering questions regarding Prior with the caution that Prior's "perfect" delivery was flawed. He was heading full-length towards injury just as certain as his mound mate with the Cubs, Kerry Wood. Now at the time, this was on the order of saying the Emperor had no clothes, or that the Earth was round. It went against almost universally accepted wisdom. Wisdom gathered by first one person saying it, then another, and another until soon only a fool would dare get up and contradict the collective logic.
But Dr. Marshall calls it like he sees it, and he does not suffer fools gladly.
That may be why he does not endear himself to major league front office minds. Many of them don't want to have to think too hard. But when Prior, shortly thereafter began to have arm problems that he seemingly still has not recovered from, it should be noted that only Dr. Marshall predicted that this would happen using foresight and not the traditional baseball wisdom of 20-20 hindsight.
Marshall's credentials are impeccable and the faith he has in both his methods and his mission are impregnable. His style and bedside manner is as ferocious as a pit-bull. In my opinion, this is due to his obvious passion for the subject matter and the the consequences of failure to deliver the results that young pitchers are expecting. To be able to pitch effectively, consistently and injury-free.
When Marshall was a player he was a bit of an enigma, however he pitched virtually everyday, racking up innings pitched totals that would be the envy of most starting pitchers of today. When reporters or other players tried to find out what it was he was doing to get results that were so far from the mainstream, he told them he studied kinesiology. Players certainly had no idea what that meant, neither did reporters. Both groups it seems were equal parts intellectually lazy and skeptical of what Marshall was communicating to them, so they stopped communicating it seems.
One of the things I did get from my visits to Zephyrhills, was that Dr. Mike does not water down his terminology or his methodology. Those who can't keep up are swept aside. By the same token, those who stay in the ring and fight to learn end up richly rewarded in the end. The results speak for themselves.
I was just winding down my less than illustrious playing career when Marshall was dominating with the Dodgers. And I admired him, in spite of the fact that he played for the Dodgers, because he was an average sized individual, doing extraordinary things at the the highest level of his craft, a craft that was generally dominated by above average sized individuals.
If you visit his website www.drmikemarshall.com you will find his FREE Book, and also a fantastic CD that illustrates and explains the training and techniques. I can't recommend any books or CD's higher then these for training pitchers.
There currently is a small army of coaches who are using these techniques, Marshall currently offers a certification program for those interested. I know I'll be down there as soon as my schedule fits the Doc's.
For selfish reasons, I would prefer that not that many fellow coaches knew of or employed Marshall's methods, but for the greater good of preventing pitching arm injuries, how can any serious pitching coach ignore these methods when the traditional methods currently being taught have been proven to be a failure over and over and over again.
Q: What's the definition of INSANITY?
A: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
I think this maxim applies here. ENJOY THE JOURNEY.
HERE ARE SOME ILLUSTRATIONS OF SOME OF THE METHODS HIS TRAINEES USE:
STUDENT USING MARSHALL REBOUND WALL:
STUDENTS USING MARSHALL WRIST WEIGHTS:
EXCERPTS FROM THE ARTICLE:
Marshall won a Cy Young award with the Los Angeles Dodgers in 1974, earned his Ph.D. in exercise physiology four years later and in the 30 years since has developed a motion that he believes could completely eradicate pitching-arm injuries, if only the right people would listen.
Marshall is 64 years old, impish and hyperkinetic. At 5-foot-8½, he looks more Ph.D. than ex-ballplayer. He still holds major-league records for games pitched in one season (106), relief innings pitched (208 1/3) and consecutive games for a pitcher (13), all set with the Los Angeles Dodgers in his 1974 Cy Young season. Everyone around baseball figured Marshall some kind of genetic freak, or maybe a masochist.
Marshall has a Ph.D. in exercise physiology from Michigan State. He was just ahead of his time. Almost 40 years ago, when he started the studies toward his doctorate at Michigan State, Marshall had questions about how to throw a baseball without injuring himself. Millions of pitches, thousands of feet of high-speed film and hundreds of adjustments later, he believes knows the answers better than anyone in the world.
"I'm a researcher," Marshall said. "People forget that about me. That's where my heart is. I pitched baseball, really, as the lab experiment of my research to see if it worked. Turned out it did. I don't need any more validation that I know something about baseball.
"I know what works. That's the greatest truth there is. I have a responsibility to give it back. Nobody wants it? Hey. That's not my problem."
Some days it sounds like a pig farm with all the noise. Marshall has expanded the exercise far beyond the 6-, 10- and 15-pound iron balls. The students, usually half a dozen ranging from 18 to 25 years old, are mostly marginal pitchers who want to pitch in college or maybe independent ball. With a wrist weight ranging from 15 to 30 pounds tethered to their pitching arm, they swing their pitching arm straight down like a pendulum, lift it over their ear and follow through with a hard pronation, turning the wrist outward with the thumb pointing down.
Marshall is convinced these actions can help save baseball from one of its great scourges. The rest of the motion is simple. No leg kick. No rotating the hips back toward second base. Facing the hitter, the pitcher steps with his glove-side foot and rotates his other leg with such fury his back almost ends up parallel to home plate.
And yet the motion comes straight from the laboratory. Following Marshall's rookie season in 1967, when his poor delivery caused shoulder pain, he used high-speed film to analyze himself and noticed that if a pitcher pronates his forearm, it protects his elbow and shoulder. Marshall continued to refine the motion, adding the pendulum swings, where musculature prevents elbow-ligament damage, and the step forward, to prevent the arm from flying out and locking up. Marshall's theory: Apply all force toward home plate instead of wasting it laterally with complicated wind-ups.
Whatever Marshall's students thought they knew he makes them forget. They learn a new vocabulary to complement the new motion. Maxline is a pitch that comes in on the arm side of the plate, a torque pitch to the other. They know a lat is really a latissimus dorsi, plus the proper names for the other 35 muscles used in the pitching motion.
In one week with Marshall, a pitcher throws more than he would in a month with an affiliated team. It's every day for 90 minutes, with the wrist weights, the iron ball and weighted lids from 4-gallon drums or footballs to help learn the release of a pronation curveball. Sometimes the lids go flying like Frisbees, so every inch of the 16-by-12-foot nets is necessary. Then it's at least 50 pitches with real baseballs, usually more.
More than 100 students have gone through Marshall's 280-day program, and he claims not one has left injured. Williams was cut by the Mets in 2006 after they told him a magnetic resonance imaging revealed a torn labrum in the shoulder. A week after starting Marshall's program, Williams' pain disappeared.
"Have you ever had surgery on your labrum?" Marshall said.
"No," Williams said.
"And do you ever have pain throwing as hard as you can today?" Marshall said.
"No," Williams said.
"This is Jeff Sparks," Marshall said. "He is the most highly skilled pitcher in the world. And nobody will hire him."
Jeff Sparks, 35, temples graying, scowling like Billy Bob Thornton, is Mike Marshall's greatest student and greatest success. Right now, he sells home-and-garden products at Lowe's. He also goes to firefighter school. In December, he'll take EMT certification training.
Here is the part where everyone calls Mike Marshall a lunatic, where they laugh at his motion, attack his science, scoff at his claims and roll their eyes.
Because for all of the triumphs Marshall sees, the baseball world sees him for what he hasn't done, and that is consistently produce major-league-caliber players. And so develops the Catch-22: Teams think Marshall is too much of a kook to send him top-of-the-line talent and elite players avoid him because they don't want any sort of associated stigma.
"Mike Marshall thinks I'm nuts, God bless him," said Tom House, the former big-league reliever, longtime pitching coach for Prior and, yes, a frequent target of Marshall's jabs. "I really admire his passion about what he does. But he's not the only one who does it."
Any suggestion that Marshall adapt his program – mix his motion with the traditional motion to make the transition easier, or cut out the terminology to focus on the end rather than the means, or perhaps collaborate with others in the growing field of biomechanics – is met with a stern no.
As averse as Marshall is to his peers' theories, he at least respects the science behind them. For baseball executives, who he believes take pride in their ignorance, Marshall saves a special kind of repugnance.
"I got tired of appeasing the stupid," Marshall said. "How long does a blonde have to act like a moron before she gets a date? These people (in organized baseball) are idiots. They don't know a damn thing. The thing is, they're powerful. They get the kids and can destroy them. And they do."
Problem is, the teachings – the same pitching motion for the last century – have led to arm breakdowns that stifled, shortened or ended careers. So in the mid-'90s, Marshall sent a letter to all 30 teams offering his services. No one bit. He called GMs he knew from his playing days and never heard back.
It won't happen. Marshall resigns himself to this. He tries to slough off any bitterness. He can't fathom why businessmen would shoo away something that would save them tens of millions of dollars.
At this point, he only hopes his ideas flourish. When Roger Clemens throws his fastball with a hard pronation of the wrist, Marshall beams. And, even better, during Clemens' first minor-league rehabilitation session, Marshall thought he saw a pendulum swing, a rarity among major leagues.
"People are going to take bits and pieces," Marshall said, "and if that's the way this spreads, fine. They're eventually going to figure out how I teach that curveball, and it's going to dominate baseball. Then they're going to pendulum swing, and that's going to get rid of Tommy John surgery. And then if they get the arm up before the front foot lands, that will take care of the front-of-the-shoulder problems. And then … "
Marshall kept talking. About different muscles, and where they attach, and what they do, and all of the things that make his theories, brilliant as they may be, so inaccessible. Only he stopped himself, like he knew he was getting off the point. As much as he is Dr. Mike Marshall, biomechanist, kinesiologist and anatomist, he's also just Doc, single-minded as ever.
"And then, finally," Marshall said, "we'll develop the best pitchers anyone's ever seen."
Jeff Passan is a national baseball writer for Yahoo! Sports. Send Jeff a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.
DR. MIKE MARSHALL TODAY:
There was a great feature article this week on the man who I consider the best pitching coach in the country bar none, Dr. Mike Marshall, by Jeff Passan at Yahoo Sports.
Dr. Marshall believes that Sir Isaac Newton may in fact be the greatest pitching coach who ever lived, but you have to dig through his FREE on-line book to find out why.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=Apk10uwj8nzz0lVh14FxK3w5nYcB?slug=jp-marshall051007&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
I've been to the Marshall Training Facility in Zephyrhills on a couple of occasions and Dr. Mike has always been open and accessible to coaches and players. Those that see the training methods first-hand and the impact it has on pitchers cannot help but come away impressed, and at times, awed. His guys always have lights out stuff, a great variety and quality of breaking pitches.
I recall on one occasion I visited and witnessed Jeff Sparks throwing the 15 lb. iron ball into the rebound wall as if it was a baseball or a softball. There was no hump-back trajectory, He was throwing from some distance away from the wall (most of the trainees work out close to the wall) and there was plenty of heat on the the throw. I believe they were shooting a feature for one of MLB's highlight shows. I never saw the show run live, but it was an awesome display of power pitching.
His methods are not accepted by the mainstream pitching gurus or major league baseball and that may be a good thing. MLB's track record of arm injuries amongst pitchers in their care and custody is historically bad and seemingly getting worse. It may only trail the collective record of the so-called pitching gurus who combined have not injured anybody "according to their records", but have presided over a nationwide epidemic of youth arm injuries.
I recall when I visited the complex for the first time, a young Mark Prior was blazing through the major leagues, with the mere mention of his name eliciting gushing comments regarding his perfect mechanics and impending injury-free, Hall of Fame career. Guaranteed. You couldn't get coaches to drool more if you had Pamela Anderson show up in a thong.
Tom House's computer told him Prior was perfect, and House came down from his mountain top to tell all of us coaches, so goodness gracious, it had to be true. At that time, Dr. Mike was answering questions regarding Prior with the caution that Prior's "perfect" delivery was flawed. He was heading full-length towards injury just as certain as his mound mate with the Cubs, Kerry Wood. Now at the time, this was on the order of saying the Emperor had no clothes, or that the Earth was round. It went against almost universally accepted wisdom. Wisdom gathered by first one person saying it, then another, and another until soon only a fool would dare get up and contradict the collective logic.
But Dr. Marshall calls it like he sees it, and he does not suffer fools gladly.
That may be why he does not endear himself to major league front office minds. Many of them don't want to have to think too hard. But when Prior, shortly thereafter began to have arm problems that he seemingly still has not recovered from, it should be noted that only Dr. Marshall predicted that this would happen using foresight and not the traditional baseball wisdom of 20-20 hindsight.
Marshall's credentials are impeccable and the faith he has in both his methods and his mission are impregnable. His style and bedside manner is as ferocious as a pit-bull. In my opinion, this is due to his obvious passion for the subject matter and the the consequences of failure to deliver the results that young pitchers are expecting. To be able to pitch effectively, consistently and injury-free.
When Marshall was a player he was a bit of an enigma, however he pitched virtually everyday, racking up innings pitched totals that would be the envy of most starting pitchers of today. When reporters or other players tried to find out what it was he was doing to get results that were so far from the mainstream, he told them he studied kinesiology. Players certainly had no idea what that meant, neither did reporters. Both groups it seems were equal parts intellectually lazy and skeptical of what Marshall was communicating to them, so they stopped communicating it seems.
One of the things I did get from my visits to Zephyrhills, was that Dr. Mike does not water down his terminology or his methodology. Those who can't keep up are swept aside. By the same token, those who stay in the ring and fight to learn end up richly rewarded in the end. The results speak for themselves.
I was just winding down my less than illustrious playing career when Marshall was dominating with the Dodgers. And I admired him, in spite of the fact that he played for the Dodgers, because he was an average sized individual, doing extraordinary things at the the highest level of his craft, a craft that was generally dominated by above average sized individuals.
If you visit his website www.drmikemarshall.com you will find his FREE Book, and also a fantastic CD that illustrates and explains the training and techniques. I can't recommend any books or CD's higher then these for training pitchers.
There currently is a small army of coaches who are using these techniques, Marshall currently offers a certification program for those interested. I know I'll be down there as soon as my schedule fits the Doc's.
For selfish reasons, I would prefer that not that many fellow coaches knew of or employed Marshall's methods, but for the greater good of preventing pitching arm injuries, how can any serious pitching coach ignore these methods when the traditional methods currently being taught have been proven to be a failure over and over and over again.
Q: What's the definition of INSANITY?
A: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
I think this maxim applies here. ENJOY THE JOURNEY.
HERE ARE SOME ILLUSTRATIONS OF SOME OF THE METHODS HIS TRAINEES USE:
STUDENT USING MARSHALL REBOUND WALL:
STUDENTS USING MARSHALL WRIST WEIGHTS:
EXCERPTS FROM THE ARTICLE:
Marshall won a Cy Young award with the Los Angeles Dodgers in 1974, earned his Ph.D. in exercise physiology four years later and in the 30 years since has developed a motion that he believes could completely eradicate pitching-arm injuries, if only the right people would listen.
Marshall is 64 years old, impish and hyperkinetic. At 5-foot-8½, he looks more Ph.D. than ex-ballplayer. He still holds major-league records for games pitched in one season (106), relief innings pitched (208 1/3) and consecutive games for a pitcher (13), all set with the Los Angeles Dodgers in his 1974 Cy Young season. Everyone around baseball figured Marshall some kind of genetic freak, or maybe a masochist.
Marshall has a Ph.D. in exercise physiology from Michigan State. He was just ahead of his time. Almost 40 years ago, when he started the studies toward his doctorate at Michigan State, Marshall had questions about how to throw a baseball without injuring himself. Millions of pitches, thousands of feet of high-speed film and hundreds of adjustments later, he believes knows the answers better than anyone in the world.
"I'm a researcher," Marshall said. "People forget that about me. That's where my heart is. I pitched baseball, really, as the lab experiment of my research to see if it worked. Turned out it did. I don't need any more validation that I know something about baseball.
"I know what works. That's the greatest truth there is. I have a responsibility to give it back. Nobody wants it? Hey. That's not my problem."
Some days it sounds like a pig farm with all the noise. Marshall has expanded the exercise far beyond the 6-, 10- and 15-pound iron balls. The students, usually half a dozen ranging from 18 to 25 years old, are mostly marginal pitchers who want to pitch in college or maybe independent ball. With a wrist weight ranging from 15 to 30 pounds tethered to their pitching arm, they swing their pitching arm straight down like a pendulum, lift it over their ear and follow through with a hard pronation, turning the wrist outward with the thumb pointing down.
Marshall is convinced these actions can help save baseball from one of its great scourges. The rest of the motion is simple. No leg kick. No rotating the hips back toward second base. Facing the hitter, the pitcher steps with his glove-side foot and rotates his other leg with such fury his back almost ends up parallel to home plate.
And yet the motion comes straight from the laboratory. Following Marshall's rookie season in 1967, when his poor delivery caused shoulder pain, he used high-speed film to analyze himself and noticed that if a pitcher pronates his forearm, it protects his elbow and shoulder. Marshall continued to refine the motion, adding the pendulum swings, where musculature prevents elbow-ligament damage, and the step forward, to prevent the arm from flying out and locking up. Marshall's theory: Apply all force toward home plate instead of wasting it laterally with complicated wind-ups.
Whatever Marshall's students thought they knew he makes them forget. They learn a new vocabulary to complement the new motion. Maxline is a pitch that comes in on the arm side of the plate, a torque pitch to the other. They know a lat is really a latissimus dorsi, plus the proper names for the other 35 muscles used in the pitching motion.
In one week with Marshall, a pitcher throws more than he would in a month with an affiliated team. It's every day for 90 minutes, with the wrist weights, the iron ball and weighted lids from 4-gallon drums or footballs to help learn the release of a pronation curveball. Sometimes the lids go flying like Frisbees, so every inch of the 16-by-12-foot nets is necessary. Then it's at least 50 pitches with real baseballs, usually more.
More than 100 students have gone through Marshall's 280-day program, and he claims not one has left injured. Williams was cut by the Mets in 2006 after they told him a magnetic resonance imaging revealed a torn labrum in the shoulder. A week after starting Marshall's program, Williams' pain disappeared.
"Have you ever had surgery on your labrum?" Marshall said.
"No," Williams said.
"And do you ever have pain throwing as hard as you can today?" Marshall said.
"No," Williams said.
"This is Jeff Sparks," Marshall said. "He is the most highly skilled pitcher in the world. And nobody will hire him."
Jeff Sparks, 35, temples graying, scowling like Billy Bob Thornton, is Mike Marshall's greatest student and greatest success. Right now, he sells home-and-garden products at Lowe's. He also goes to firefighter school. In December, he'll take EMT certification training.
Here is the part where everyone calls Mike Marshall a lunatic, where they laugh at his motion, attack his science, scoff at his claims and roll their eyes.
Because for all of the triumphs Marshall sees, the baseball world sees him for what he hasn't done, and that is consistently produce major-league-caliber players. And so develops the Catch-22: Teams think Marshall is too much of a kook to send him top-of-the-line talent and elite players avoid him because they don't want any sort of associated stigma.
"Mike Marshall thinks I'm nuts, God bless him," said Tom House, the former big-league reliever, longtime pitching coach for Prior and, yes, a frequent target of Marshall's jabs. "I really admire his passion about what he does. But he's not the only one who does it."
Any suggestion that Marshall adapt his program – mix his motion with the traditional motion to make the transition easier, or cut out the terminology to focus on the end rather than the means, or perhaps collaborate with others in the growing field of biomechanics – is met with a stern no.
As averse as Marshall is to his peers' theories, he at least respects the science behind them. For baseball executives, who he believes take pride in their ignorance, Marshall saves a special kind of repugnance.
"I got tired of appeasing the stupid," Marshall said. "How long does a blonde have to act like a moron before she gets a date? These people (in organized baseball) are idiots. They don't know a damn thing. The thing is, they're powerful. They get the kids and can destroy them. And they do."
Problem is, the teachings – the same pitching motion for the last century – have led to arm breakdowns that stifled, shortened or ended careers. So in the mid-'90s, Marshall sent a letter to all 30 teams offering his services. No one bit. He called GMs he knew from his playing days and never heard back.
It won't happen. Marshall resigns himself to this. He tries to slough off any bitterness. He can't fathom why businessmen would shoo away something that would save them tens of millions of dollars.
At this point, he only hopes his ideas flourish. When Roger Clemens throws his fastball with a hard pronation of the wrist, Marshall beams. And, even better, during Clemens' first minor-league rehabilitation session, Marshall thought he saw a pendulum swing, a rarity among major leagues.
"People are going to take bits and pieces," Marshall said, "and if that's the way this spreads, fine. They're eventually going to figure out how I teach that curveball, and it's going to dominate baseball. Then they're going to pendulum swing, and that's going to get rid of Tommy John surgery. And then if they get the arm up before the front foot lands, that will take care of the front-of-the-shoulder problems. And then … "
Marshall kept talking. About different muscles, and where they attach, and what they do, and all of the things that make his theories, brilliant as they may be, so inaccessible. Only he stopped himself, like he knew he was getting off the point. As much as he is Dr. Mike Marshall, biomechanist, kinesiologist and anatomist, he's also just Doc, single-minded as ever.
"And then, finally," Marshall said, "we'll develop the best pitchers anyone's ever seen."
Jeff Passan is a national baseball writer for Yahoo! Sports. Send Jeff a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.
Friday, May 18, 2007
OMG According to Dan Patrick, Dan Patrick might be a Racist
OK so let me see if I follow the logic correctly:
Commissioner Stern scolds young Danny Patrick (nee: Pugh) and wacks him in the weenie over the Stoudamire-Diauw suspensions because DP wants the best players on the the court even though they violated a serious league rule, known to all players, designed to keep skirmishes from escalating into something more serious.
DP's logic: I just want to see the rule "open to interpretation" so it allows star players to violate it and still play. He doesn't want the series decided by Horry's cheap shot.
The Commisioner correctly, and in a tone dripping with condescension and sarcasm, admonishes Dan that NBA decisions should not be decided by what's best for the league economically in matter such as this.
He also realizes that the reason a generation of fans are turned off to the NBA is for just this reason. It's a star-driven league, they make the rules, they break the rules. This is how the NBA got to be the current NBA, which is to say And-1 without the annoying P.A. Announcer.
RANT ALERT:Kobe should be able to whack anyone that dares challenge his jump shot, and if he wacks an ocassional pretty, young hotel employee on the side, who cares. He's Kobe.
Iverson can palm the ball with impunity, because that's what the fans pay to see. Even Skip to My Lou from the And-1 team can release his persona and go legit in today's NBA. Anything goers.
Then, when the FIBA refs get there and call the rules as they are written, "without interpretation", the so-called "best players in the world" get routinely thumped.
Anyway back to my original point:
After the Commisioner leaves, of course young Daniel says that "Wow, the Commisioner really was defensive about his position regarding the rule and the suspensions" and concludes that this defensiveness is a sure sign that he doesn't really believe in the position he is stating.
And then today, like most days, he rips into Bonds and a caller or an e-mailer will ask him why he doesn't rip Clemens or Giambi and implies or states directly that racism is a motive.
And it occurs to me that every time I've heard that happen, that Danno gets REALLY, REALLY DEFENSIVE about the fact that not everything is racial and he himself is not a racist.
And today I just put two and two together and, OMG, Danny is trying to tell us that subconsiously, and using his logic, he might be a racist. OMG. It's as clear as a bell. Dan, this is an obvious cry for help. And you need help. Thankfully, we are a forgiving country and I'm sure you'll rebound from this around the same time Don Imus does.
That and if you've ever heard his "White Boy can play" story, You'd know the man has some serious issues. Classic White Guilt. Oh well, another boyhood hero falls by the wayside. What is this world coming to?
Bonds Divides Nation Again...Let's Get Ready to Rumble
It's Black vs. White.....Player vs. Fans....Hitters vs. Pitchers in a battle of epic proportions for the heart and minds of baseball fans all-over the world. If he starts dividing us Boy vs. Girl, Oh man!! It's on, then. It's going to be a real throw down at that point. Let's hope cooler heads prevail before that happens people.
By the time Barry breaks the record, there won't be a man woman or child left in the country who hasn't been asked "What do you think....". It's office cooler gossip gone wild.
I don't care anymore that Hank Aaron is too busy folding Bud Selig's laundry to go.
I don't care that Bud Selig is too busy being the most ignorant commissioner of all time to go. At least he doesn't have to fold his own laundry.
I don't care that the more mealy-mouthed, panty-waisted, bed wetting, so called "guardians of the game", who still aren't over the psychological trauma of their mommies throwing out their baseball card collection, keep whining poetic about the sanctity of a baseball record like it's the deity, Get Over It, you little (INSERT COMMON NAME FOR FEMALE DOG HERE).
I don't care if those who don't like it hold their noses, in fact, I don't care if some of them hold their noses too long and have a bit of an accident, if you know what I'm saying. You know what I'm saying?
I don't care what the latest he-said, she-said...did you hear what so and so said garbage in the papers everyday. Who cares what Schilling or Wells or Ortiz or whoever have to say? I guess everyone does.
And even though you didn't ask (that's what blogs are for) I would caution all the haters piling onto the A-Rod as next Home Run King Love Boat that's currently boarding:
First, Alex is more of a Prince Charming type than a King type.
Second, Alex is a sensitive little flower, he senses that like certain high school romances, this one has all the earmarks of one based more on your feelings of revenge against the current king to be, rather than any actual true feelings of love for him. Like, it once was with Derek (giggle, giggle). This has disaster written all over it. You can't toy with the emotions of a future HOF like that.
Third, his manicurist says that the pressure of hitting all those home-runs are going to make those really gross callouses on his hands even worse and then no girl will really want him. Never mind, that won't be an impediment.
Fourth, You know how Alex responds to pressure. You've practically guranteed that he won't get the record now. He like has that thing some men get when they can't pee in a public trough like at Wrigley Field unless there's nobody else in the park and yeah, right what's the chances of that ever happening? THAT'S CRAZY.
So anyway, my point here (if indeed I really have one) is be careful what you wish for. Or whose boat you get on, this one has Gilligan's Island written all over it.
ANYWAY HERE'S THE LATEST:
From one of the best baseball blogs out there:
http://www.baseballmusings.com/
Commenting on today's USA Today Headlines:
http://www.baseballmusings.com/
Boost or No Boost?
Jason Giambi comes down on the side of Barry Bonds,
saying the steroid boost is overrated:
Giambi won't say whether he believes Bonds ever took
steroids or human growth hormone, but he's convinced
that no drug is responsible for Bonds' extraordinary
career.
"Barry is one of the greatest players, if not the
greatest, I'll ever see play," says Giambi, who has
hit 355 career home runs. "I know people have a tough
time accepting it, but what he's doing is
unbelievable. And I don't care what people say --
nothing is going to give you that gift of hitting a
baseball.
"It's the same thing for Barry. If it were that easy,
how come you don't see anyone else doing what he has
done?"
I find two things interesting about this type of
argument. It separates the skill of hitting the ball
from the strength to drive the ball. In other words,
if the eye-hand coordination isn't there, if the body
mechanics aren't there, it doesn't matter how strong
you are.
So, if players believe this is true, why take steroids
in the first place? Giambi didn't answer that.
"Unfortunately, (the rumors) are going to be a part of
it. But that's OK. I'm probably tested more than
anybody else. I'm not hiding anything," said Giambi,
hitting .273 with five homers this season. "That stuff
didn't help me hit home runs. I don't care what people
say, nothing is going to give you that gift of hitting
a baseball."
In general, people use drugs because they work.
Recreational drugs make you feel good. Steroids help
build muscle. If Giambi is suddenly becoming talkative
on the subject, let's hear the whole thing. And I hope
it's better than, "Everyone else was doing it."
My commentary regarding the article and David Pinto's
comments over at Baseball Musings:
Interesting analogy you make to use of PED and use of
recreational drugs.
It's the short-term temporary illusion that
recreational drugs make you feel better when, in most
cases, on a long-term basis, they really don't succeed
in making many people feel better overall.
I believe much the same to be true with steroids/HGH
use in baseball, reflected in Giambi's comments.
Short-term, confidence boost, yes.
Muscle Mass increase, yes. Whether that additional
mass is utilized to faster bat speed has not yet been
proven conclusively for obvious reasons.
And Bonds always had lightning quick bat speed and hit
some monster tape measure home runs even back when he
was built like a Popsicle stick.
You would have to improve bat speed, which is a
combination of strength and speed. Very difficult to
do both. Many believe without being blessed with good
genetics ie: higher proportion of fast-twitch muscle
fibers, that increased mass in most cases is
irrelevant except to make for a better looking squad
coming off the bus.
I thinks that is what the David Ortiz's and Giambi's
are getting at when they acknowledge what Bonds is
doing is admirable on some level.
Either he's the only one who has figured out how to
combine PED use with maintenance of the unique sports
skill of hitting a baseball (hardest thing to do in
sports IMO) while avoiding injury and breakdowns
associated with PED use.
Canseco's career derailed due to injuries. There are
others Jose implicated who you could argue had
potential HOF careers detoured primarily due to PED
use.
I think that's the reason for the apparent disconnect
between fans response to Bonds and players response.
Among players, most of the negative stuff has come
from pitchers (Schilling, Lidle, Wendell) although
Clemens was surprisingly positive except for the love
tap to the elbow guard incident.
Hitters know how difficult it is, with or without PED
use to hit home runs. And unfortunately, for what it's
worth, they have become the human guinea pigs as to
whether the stuff works or doesn't work effectively,
if you temporarily put ethical issues aside. We won't
know the long-term health ramifications for this set
of guys for another 20-30 years.
Ultimately, you're always going to be left with the
ethical dilemma of whether the risk of being caught
and the long-term health issues are worth the
potential reward of being a Major League player, on
whatever level.
Would you take a winning lottery check today, worth
anywhere between $1M and potentially hundreds of
millions, if you were told that if you won you could
lose 10-20 years off your life?
What's the old smokers retort? "Well, it's the last
twenty years, they weren't going to be very good years
anyway"
Posted by Charles Slavik at May 18, 2007 11:33 AM
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Devil Rays in Disney & Kruckie No Likey :(
Kruk trashed the idea of D-Rays playing in Orlando in a minor league
park. This shows why Sternberg is who he is (a successful businessman)
and Kruk is who he is (an idiot, hack, talking head). Compare business acumen based on bank accounts and Sterberg wins. I mean, I can criticize Warren Buffet's investment decisions but based on our prior track records (and bank accounts), who's going to look like the fool?
Kruckie analyzed this as a former player, thinking the buffet spread in the locker room was going to be minor-league, the post-game beer was going to be minor-league, and probably that the tail in the stands was going to be decidely minor-league. Sternberg is trying to build a franchise. I give him an A for effort. And from a fans perspective, if you can see major league baseball combined with the charm and proximity of a minor-league park, you've got something. Now, if only the concession prices were the same. Well, there goes that dream.
EXCERPTS FROM THE ARTICLE:
http://www.sptimes.com/2007/05/16/Rays/Sternberg_s_blind_amb.shtml
He is a dreamer, your Devil Rays owner. Where you see apathy, he sees
potential. Where you see empty seats, he sees untapped resources.
The Rays have a hard time getting fans to cross a bridge, and this guy
is envisioning them getting excited halfway across a state.
"I don't mind ambitious, " Sternberg said, standing on a field at
Disney's Wide World Sports complex. "There's no such thing as too
ambitious."
So how could you possibly watch people walking out of a ballpark at the
start of the 10th inning and not deem it a mistake of wild proportions?
By buying into Sternberg's vision.
"We can survive barely and we can do okay if we get the support of St.
Pete and Tampa, " Sternberg said. "We can thrive - which is what
everybody in St. Pete and Tampa wants - if I do my job expanding to become a
regional franchise. From Port Charlotte up, and Orlando in.
"We have to be a regional franchise."
But, really, that was not the purpose of this series. Sternberg's plan
is grander. He sees advertising dollars. He sees demographics. He sees
marketing.
And he sees lots and lots of television sets.
Before the Rays moved into Orlando's ballpark, they invaded Central
Florida's airwaves. The Rays increased their TV package from around 25 to
67 games.
This means a market that was the 27th largest in the United States,
according to the latest census, has Rays games on TV several nights a week
all summer long.
"Would I rather have 30, 000 people in the stadium or 1-million
watching on TV?" Sternberg said. "I think I would probably rather have
1-million people watching on TV. It's more important to know that 1-million
people do care. And, from a money standpoint and the advertising, there's
more revenue derived there.
"The Red Sox draw people on TV in Maine, all over Massachusetts, down
in Connecticut, Hartford and New Haven. People three hours away, for
goodness sakes. I know they're the Red Sox, and I know we're not. It's
going to take us a long time. But you have to start. And here's where I'm
starting. I'm putting my flag in the ground right here, and I get
everything in between."
The Rays are nowhere near 1-million viewers on their television
network, but ratings are up. In Orlando, the Rays say they've actually
doubled. That may be easier when you're basically starting from zero, but it's
still a nice boost.
And team president Matt Silverman said it is a direct correlation from
the exposure of this three-game series in the market.
© Copyright 2002-2007, St. Petersburg Times
Thursday, May 10, 2007
10 and Counting
Too bad all the fools like Schilling are learning the difference between ADMISSIONS and ALLEGATIONS.
Too bad some fools will never learn the difference.
I wonder how they'll reconcile the clean player vs. dirty player argument when/if A-Rod hits 800-900.
Great player in the artificial turf era, when speed was at a premium.
Great player in the small park, juiced ball era, when power was at a premium.
Greatest combination of speed an power in baseball history.
Currently leads the league in HR's and OPS at 42. If it was Clemens leading the league in major pitching categories, we would be having a parade, without suspicion and innuendo.
You'd have to be an absolute moron as a player to still be juicing, and I love the argument that HGH is undetectable. YEAH, UNDETECTABLE NOW. What serious player would risk his legacy on the chance that 10 years from now the technology won't be developed to go back and test prior samples for HGH use. You'd have to be a complete idiot.
The countdown is 10. Enjoy the show. HAHAHA
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Kentucky Derby Recap
From second to last at the 1/2 mile post to blow past the field on the rail, just phenomenal view and brilliant pickup of the move by the track announcer.
Brilliant ride by the jockey of Street Sense.
Recall our picks to watch were in order:
Street Sense
Scat Daddy
Great Hunter
Of course Street Sense was bet down to the race favorite by the time the horses went to the post, so there would not have been much money in having the favorite win.
I have to admit to thinking about trying to nail the old trifecta with these three but never got around to it. But luckily I did not consult with this fellow before the race. Sounds like he's getting both his gambling and probability and statistics skills from our old friend Charles Barkley.
http://blog.sportscolumn.com/story/2007/5/8/85738/80228/oth_other/How_not_to_bet_the_Kentucky_Derby
We love betting the trifecta. For a buck or two, you can win hundreds if not thousands of dollars on a race. Hell, sometimes we'll even go crazy and go with the trifecta box. However, we also know enough about statistics to know that you can't bet every single permutation in a race and expect to come out on top.
But that's exactly what a man in Rochester, NY did. On the day of the Kentucky Derby, a man walked into an OTB and asked how much it would cost to buy every possible trifecta combination. And now we break for a quick math lesson--
If you have 20 horses in the field, the possible outcomes for the first three horses would be 20! / (20-3)! = 6,840. Likewise, a superfecta (first 4 horses) would be 116,280. And now back to your regularly scheduled programming--
The man was told the answer and came back to place the wagers. It cost him a total of $13,680 for his $2 trifectas and he wound up winning... wait for it... wait for it... $440. If you're gonna make a bet like this, you better know what you're getting yourself into. And since the payout odds are terrible on favorites, you should just eliminate those trifecta combinations. But alas, the man had more cash than math skills so now he's $13,240 poorer for his trouble.
This story would only be better if he does the exact same thing in the Preakness.
It's all right here in black and white
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2863623
DAVID ORTIZ COMMENTS:
Ortiz believes Bonds needs to be cheered. Loudly.
“He deserves respect,” Ortiz said Sunday in Minneapolis. “People are not going to give it to him because of all the bad things running around, this and that, but people need to realize. I’ve heard a lot of different things about Barry Bonds, but people should just admit it - this guy’s a bad (expletive).”
Whether or not Bonds will be on the verge of breaking Hank Aaron’s career mark of 755 home runs - he’s at 744 with 34 games to play before he arrives here on June 15 - Ortiz expects Fenway Park fans will be making a mistake by focusing on the performance-enhancing drug allegations against Bonds rather than his home run totals.
Ortiz has an almost willful naivete about both Bonds and steroids. He still does not believe in his heart or his head that Bonds took steroids. And even if it were proven to him, Ortiz still would not link it to what Bonds does with a baseball bat.
“To hit the frickin’ ball, the guy makes it look easy, but it ain’t. I don’t know how you can have that swing, consistently. I don’t know how steroids can do that,” Ortiz said. “There are supposed to be guys using steroids in the game, and there’s nobody close to Barry Bonds. What’s that mean? He was using the best (expletive)? Know what I’m saying?”
Ortiz is not sure how he would feel if someone ever were to prove to him that Bonds took steroids. It sounds as if it would not matter.
“I don’t look at it like that. I look at it hitting-wise, because I don’t know what steroids can do to you as a baseball player. You’ve still got to swing the bat, man,” Ortiz said. “If I ever use steroids, and then I know what the difference can be and I’m using them, I’ll tell you, ‘Yeah, whatever,’ but I don’t know what the feelings are when you use the steroids. But I can tell you how it feels to pull yourself together to swing the bat.”
No matter where Bonds breaks Aaron’s mark, Ortiz wants commissioner Bud Selig to be there.
“He’s just making things worse,” Ortiz said of Selig’s inconclusive remarks about attending. “He’s the commissioner, there’s nothing you can do about it. You can’t be saying that. What are people going to think about the game? They’ll be like, ‘This game is a joke.’ He should come, even if he doesn’t want to.”
Despite revelations in “Game of Shadows,” the book by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams that offers a damning chain of evidence linking BALCO and a number of baseball players, including Bonds, Ortiz said he is unaware of any evidence that Bonds used steroids.
“Have they proved he used steroids?” Ortiz asked. “But it was a cream or something he was using. He wasn’t injecting anything, right?”
Ortiz said he just cannot be sure so he doesn’t want to think about it.
“People come to me, talking about Barry Bonds using steroids and I’m like, ‘He’s the only one, or are people focused on him because of what he’s doing?’ So I don’t go there, I don’t even think about it,” Ortiz said. “I think about how he can be that perfect at the plate because I don’t think that steroids mentally get you perfect.”
Ortiz believes people who have a problem with Bonds either never played the game or are pitchers.
“If you go to the hitters, and ask them, ‘A), What do you think about 744 home runs?’ and b), ‘You know how hard it is to hit a baseball. What do you think about that?’ The bottom line is, I don’t care what people say.”
CURT SCHILLING'S COMMENTS:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18557376/
Boston Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling suggested that it's a travesty to the national pastime that Barry Bonds is about to break Henry Aaron's home run record, the Boston Globe reported Tuesday.
On the WEEI’s "Dennis and Callahan" radio show, Schilling was asked if fans should "hold their noses" while watching Bonds’s pursuit of the all-time record. Bonds is 11 from tying the all-time record of 755.
“Oh yeah. I would think so. I mean, he admitted that he used steroids,” said Schilling, according to the Globe. “I mean, there’s no gray area. He admitted to cheating on his wife, cheating on his taxes, and cheating on the game, so I think the reaction around the league, the game, being what it is, in the case of what people think. Hank Aaron not being there. The commissioner [Bud Selig] trying to figure out where to be. It’s sad.
“And I don’t care that he’s black, or green, or purple, or yellow, or whatever. It’s unfortunate . . . there’s good people and bad people. It’s unfortunate that it’s happening the way it’s happening.”
Despite Schilling's remarks, Bonds has never admitted to knowingly using steroids. On Dec. 4, 2003, Bonds was one of several athletes forced to testify as part of the BALCO case, which centered around the San Francisco-area lab, its founder Victor Conte, and Greg Anderson — Bonds’ personal trainer and longtime friend.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So it's apparent again to anyone with a brain that not only is there a divide in America regarding this issue, there is a divide in the Red Sox clubhouse.
I'm sure IRS Agent Novitsky would love to have an admission from Bonds that he cheated on his taxes. It would make his tax evasion case easier to prove. It seems Mr. Schiling doesn't mind if the facts get in the way of his fancy story, but I missed the part where Bonds admitted cheating on his taxes. Hey Schil, get a clue, you fucking dope, Bonds hasn't admitted cheating on his taxes and the government, as yet, has not prosecuted a tax evasion case againt him. Read the papers once in while.
Also, I wonder if the fat blowhard (among others) intends to give his teammate Ortiz the same lack of benefit of the doubt about his admission of a possible "unknowing" use of steroids. I'm sure ther will be some perceptible difference between the two stories (Ortiz and Bonds).
AS I'VE SAID MANY TIMES. YOU SIMPLY CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF UP, BUT APPARENTLY THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT SCHILLING DOES IN HIS OWN MIND. JUST MAKE UP "FACTS" OUT OF THIN AIR. MAKES YOU WONDER IF HE HAS EVEN READ "GAME OF SHADOWS". AND THIS IS THE GUY THAT CONGRESS WANTS TO HELP LEAD THE FIGHT AGAINST STEROID ABUSE. A GUY THAT JUST MAKES SHIT UP. COME ON, THIS IS TOO EASY.
Very interesting unsolicited comments from Ortiz about the "protein shakes". Makes you wonder what may or may not have been going on in or around those "Baseball Academies" that major league teams have scattered around the Dominican Republic. Makes you wonder if there may or may be be an eerie parallel between the aforementioned "protein shakes" and the "vitamins" of the German Democratic Republic that were given to the German women's swim team and other athletes without their knowledge. Makes you wonder sometimes, if that's why a disproportionate number of players and prospects are making it to The Show from that small island over recent years. God help everyone involved if that turns out to be the case.
Additional Note: The next day analysis by the talking heads focused primarily, almost exclusively, on Schilling's comments (which reinforces the negative evidence against Bonds) rather than Ortiz's comments (which tends to provide exculpatory evidence that Bonds story might be possible or reasonable).
Monday, May 07, 2007
KO and DP Comment on Bonds/Race Poll
You just can't make this stuff up. Every day these two mental midgets go on air and act as if they are the final-word, the moral compass of the nation, especially regarding sports stories.
Little Danny Pugh asks Keith Olber-douche his opinion regarding the recently published ESPN/ABC News poll and whether it indicates the racial divide that it seemingly does to most people with a brain.
And the Douche Who Would Save the Democracy dismisses the results by saying in effect "Well, were these sports fans who were polled? Because otherwise the results are meaningless to me". Hey stupid, get a clue or buy a dog and name him Clue then maybe you'll have one.
Do you honestly think the pollsters didn't think of that little detail? You obviously didn't read the story you were commenting on. Much like the Chuck Wagon opining on a story/subject of which he had little to zero knowledge about.
How do these guys continue employment with ESPN? They really need to stop polluting the airwaves with this continued below-mediocre level of research and knowledge.
THESE GUYS ABSOLUTELY STINK!
Here's a limited description of the poll methodology and it clearly indicates they sampled baseball fans, they didn't just stand on a corner in front of the Museum of Art and Science and sample people who were unlikely to have any knowledge of the subject/questions. And even if they did, one of the responses is usually No Opinion/ Don't Know, which explains why the results don't total 100%.
The ESPN/ABC News poll was conducted by telephone March 29-April 22, 2007, among a random national sample of 799 adult baseball fans, including an oversample of 203 African-Americans. The results have a 3.5-point error margin among all respondents, seven points among blacks.
Maybe these two ass-clowns and the Chuck Wagon should, when the subject matter is clearly over their head, have the guts to say No Opinion, No Comment or better yet, Not Knowledgeable Enough about the Subject Matter at hand.
MLB Draft Televised.. Roger's Back...and Linceum Debuts
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2862901
Now we just need the MLB equivalent of Mel Kiper....and a Baseball Combine, televised, and I'll be happy, for now. But, as always, I reserve the right to bitch and complain about something. But this is good.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLEMENS IS BACK WITH THE YANKEES - OMG!!!!
Who saw this coming? Call me gullible but I believed Roger when he said he didn't know if he was coming back this season. And is he telling Houston, YOU GUYS, SUCK!!! by not coming back with them? Now he's jilted the Red Sox and the Astros and at one point the Yankees. This guy really knows how to burn bridges, and repair them.....if the money is right.....and the team is desparate enough. Yeah, this will work.
(Voice of God, Bob Sheppard) Now warming up in the Yankees bullpen, The Ultimate Mercenary, Number 22, Roger Clemens. Oh yeah, Rocket's back and all is right with the world. What I'd really like to know is: Who's' the biz-notch Roger or Andy Pettitte? Aw, heck I'm just glad these fells are back together again. I couldn't stand to see Pettitte in such emotional pain. Pitching through the tears. I can hear the theme song to "Courtship of Eddie's Father" playing softly in the background.
And how will the Andy and Roger clique get along with the already fractured Derek and A-Rod relationship. Could it pull them closer together? And OMG how did Andy not know that Roger was coming back, aren't they like BFFL, I mean OMG, he didn't know, he said so on the bench.
And even Derek didn't know and he was texting and IM'ng him all the time. OMG it was such a big secret and now it's not, like OMG.
The Yankees are now the team that most resembles and acts like a hormonal, 13-year old girls softball team in American League history. Not that theirs anything wrong with that and my apologies in advance to all hormonal, 13-year old girls softball teams across the country. You go girls. NO, NOT YOU, YANKEES.
I'm sorry, I know this is evil and junk, but I'm hoping the Yankees have one more hamstring pull in them real soon. It would be poetic justice. Except some other poor, innocent Yankee underling might get fired. It's the Yankee Way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not since John D'Acquisto's debut for the Giants has a Giants rookie pitcher generated such anticipation and excitement. And although the stat line was not great, the stuff appeared as electric as advertised. His delivery reminds me of Orel Hershiser a bit with the head tilt. Hopefully, he has the same command and mental makeup down the road as The Bulldog. He seems like he was mumbling to himself as he pitched, hopefully batters can't read his lips from that distance. Maybe it was just nerves.
Hard-throwing righthanders under six-feet tall do not have a great track record in the majors, most end their string of domination at the collegiate level (think Richie Lewis from Florida State some years back), but Lincecum seems to have the goods.
A 98 MPH heater, and a back breaking, knee buckling curve ball, that we did not see very much off last night, gives me thoughts of Tim Hudson or Roy Oswalt in the Giants future, along with Matt Cain, and oh yes, the other Barry. This could be a fun half-decade to be a Giants fan. Now find a closer.
Happy 76th Birthday to Willie Mays
Might still be the greatest all around baseball player of all time. ESPN's Peter Gammons interviewed him for last night's Giants-Phillies broadcast and Mays brought up an interesting point. When Gammons asked him if had Willie played in more favorable hitters parks than Candlestick and the Polo Grounds, would he have hit possibly 800 HR's, Mays reminded him that he lost nearly 2 years to a stint in the Army that may have cost him 70-80 HR's. I'll leave it to the SABR crowd to calculate the park-adjustments, but Mays certainly never played in a park that was nicknamed "The Launching Pad".
Absolutely, one of the most awesome packages of speed and power in the history of the game. Along with Barry and Bobby Bonds, Ricky Henderson and even Joe Morgan.
One of the best qualities about Mays was he had an infectious joy for playing the game. In his earlier years in New York, it was one of his more admirable and marketable qualities. It didn't seem like he had as much fun in the game in his later years, for a variety of reasons.
Given the circumstances (1954 World Series), one of the greatest catches of all-time, and the throw afterward to keep the runner from scoring makes this catch an even more remarkable defensive play.
Always seemed poised to deliver a big strike, a big play, whether it be at-bat, on the bases or in the field. I loved watching him play. To me, like Ted Williams, Mays is baseball royalty. As far as RH hitters: Mays, Frank Robinson and Aaron were the best I've ever seen. LH Hitters: I'd rank Bonds, Ruth and Ted Williams in whatever order you'd like. Among switch hitters: Mickey Mantle and Ricky Henderson. All were great all-around players as well.
HAPPY 76TH BIRTHDAY TO THE SAY-HEY KID.
Sunday, May 06, 2007
America Divided over Bonds Chase
Divided along racial lines, duh. What have I been saying for years and years. I find it amazing that the poll reports 37% of fans would like to see him pass Aaron's record, that is certainly not the perception you get from the media, a group that is disproportionately white compared to the American population.
Also, interesting is the breakdown by those who feel Bonds is HOF worthy. 85% of blacks compared to 53% whites. In other, words if black America voted, Bonds would receive the necessary 75%, if white America voted he would not. Given that an overwhelming majority of the baseball writers who vote are white, you can see where the numbers will fall using basic mathematical skills (Don't ask Charles Barkley for help).
Clearly, race is a factor in the reporting and the perception of this issue. As the saying goes, White America needs to recognize that "denial is not just a river in Egypt". Just like any other significant life problem, recognition of the problem is ALWAYS the first step in correcting the problem. Anyone that wants to continue to argue against those two basic facts is an utter fool.
These poll figures clearly show that once again here is what the issue of race boils down to in this country today:
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION-THE PROBLEM OF "TALKING PAST ONE ANOTHER": "Two persons, carrying on a discussion in the same universe of discourse-corresponding to the same historical-social conditions-can and must do so quite differently from two persons identified with different social positions. These two types of discussion, i.e., between socially and intellectually heterogeneous participants, are to be clearly distinguished.
"Ours is a world in which social groupings, which had hitherto lived more or less isolated from one another, each making itself and its own world of thought absolute, are now, in one form or another, merging into one another. Not only Orient and Occident, not only the various nations of the west, but also the various social strata of these nations, which previously had been more or less self-contained, and, finally, the different occupational groups within these strata and the intellectual groups in this most highly differentiated world-all these are now thrown out of the self-sufficient, complacent state of taking themselves for granted, and are forced to maintain themselves and their ideas in the face of the onslaught of these heterogeneous groups.
"How do they carry on this struggle? They usually do so with but few exceptions by 'talking past one another'; i.e., although they are more or less aware that the person with whom they are discussing the matter represents another group, and that it is likely that his/her mental structure as a whole is often quite different when a concrete thing is being discussed, they speak as if their differences were confined to the specific question at issue around which their present disagreement crystallized. They overlook the fact that their antagonist differs from them in his/her whole outlook, and not merely in the opinion about the point under discussion.
"This indicates that there are types of intellectual intercourse between heterogeneous persons. The differences in the total mental structure remain obscurely in the background in so far as the contact between the participants is concerned. Consciousness for both is crystallized about the concrete issue. For each of the participants the 'object' has a more or less different meaning because it grows out of the whole of their perspective frames of reference, as a result of which the meaning of the object in the perspective of the other person remains, at least in part, obscure. Hence 'talking past one another' is an inevitable phenomenon of the 'age of equalization'."
-Karl Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia
Also, please stop with the argument that there is no racism involved because it's a black man eclipsing another black mans record. There was no love for Aaron as he approached Ruth's record.
As the numbers show, Bonds "personality" as a factor in his acceptance vis-a-vis Aaron is is more of an indictment of white America as it again indicates that there is a certain way blacks have to act in order to be "acceptable" to whites.
Ali was not very popular during the time he was dominating the boxing world, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was not popular while he was the most dominant force in the NBA. Both later became more palatable and acceptable, but both competed and endured intense levels of hatred and vitriol.
I would make the argument that Bonds is currently competing and challenging Aaron's record in a climate that is far filled with more hatred and risk then even Hank Aaron may have endured. If it could possibly be measured, I would bet that the risk of a death threat to Bonds being accomplished before he completes his record chase is far greater the level of risk Aaron may have competed under. And as we've seen with the Seles incident, and the various incidents of fan on player/coach violence on major league baseball fields recently, it cannot be denied that there is a heightened level of risk. Combine the climate with alcohol and you have a very volatile and combustible mix indeed.
The racism is more effectively covered up today than it was in the 1970's due to the politically correct environment in which we live in, but it clearly is in fact, still there.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2861930
Alcohol is a Greater Danger to Youth than Steroids
At the risk of having Tony LaRussa come at me with a fungo bat, I will say I'm not surprised by the results of the Josh Hancock autopsy. Mr. LaRussa had even more insight into Hancock's situation than I did, but upon hearing the initial accounts of the accident, my first thoughts were DWI or DWD. Turns out we had both, with a possible marijuana chaser. The results do not make it any less of a tragedy, in fact maybe more, since the accident was in many ways preventable.
Once again, we continue to ignore a national problem, that according to the data is many times more of a public health problem to American youth than steroids. The issue is underage drinking. Maybe this will be somewhat of a wake-up call to the issue.
Unfortunately, I doubt it. Alcohol is legal and widely accepted across the nation. However, at one time so was tobacco. And it was an issue of choice and personal responsibility. Then came the results that showed the danger of second hand smoke on others and it was no longer you killing yourself slowly, but you affecting the health, safety and welfare of others. And that's where your rights end and mine and those of society as a whole, begin. So we enacted restrictions on tobacco advertising , sales and when and where smokers could light up, much to the chagrin of tobacco users. And this occurred even tough the tobacco industry lobby was once as strong in Washington as the alcohol lobby is today.
You may be asking, hey Slav have you gone MADD? No, but I am mad, because the parallels between alcohol and the health and safety risks are eerily close to those of tobacco back in the 70's. Do I think there may be a day when advertising rules for alcohol products and companies will be the same as those in place for the tobacco industry? Maybe.
In the Hancock case, fortunately, he did not kill anyone else, but that often is not the case. Will Congress hold hearings on this public health issue? I doubt it. Too many campaign contributions are at stake, too many Washington parties fueled by alcohol, too many mistresses swayed by the effects of alcohol too take that one on.
IT'S A CRAZY WORLD WE LIVE IN.
http://www.centurycouncil.org/underage/65_data.html
Underage Drinking Fact Sheet
* Underage drinking remains a persistent problem among youth, though there are signs progress is being made. According to the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, about 10.8 million Americans between ages 12-20 report current alcohol consumption; this represents nearly 28% of this age group for whom alcohol use is illegal. Although there have been some declines in underage drinking from 2004 to 2005, since 2002, past month alcohol consumption has remained relatively unchanged among 12-20 year olds.
o Of these youth, nearly 7.2 million (19%) reported having engaged in binge drinking and 2.3 million (6%) in heavy drinking. More males than females aged 12 to 20 reported current alcohol consumption (29% v. 28%), binge drinking (21% v. 16%) and heavy drinking (8% v. 4%) in 2005.
o These rates of consumption reported in the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health are similar to estimates reported in the 2002, 2003 and 2004. However, there were slight declines in past month consumption and binge drinking among 12- to 17-year olds between 2004 and 2005.
o Among older age groups, the prevalence of current alcohol consumption decreased with increasing age, however, among America's youth the rate of current alcohol consumption increases with increasing age according to the 2005 survey, from 3% at age 12 to 6% at age 13, 11% at age 14, 20% at age 15, 27% at age 16, 33% at age 17, 44% at age 18, 52% at age 19, and 58% at age 20. The rate reaches a peak at 69% among persons 21 years old.
o In 2005, more male than female 12- to 20-year olds reported current alcohol consumption (29% v. 28%, respectively), binge drinking (21% v. 16%), and heavy drinking (8% v. 4%). Unfortunately, among youths 12- to 17- years old, the percentage of females who report drinking in the past 30 days remains slightly, although not significantly, higher compared to their male peers (17% for females compared with 16% for males). However, the 2005 rate of current alcohol consumption among 12- to 17-year old males and females represents a decline from the 2004 rates — the one year decline among males was significant.
* According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), first use of alcohol is typically reported to begin around age 12.
* According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), children who begin drinking before the age of 15 have a four times greater chance of becoming alcoholic as an adult than those who begin at 21, the legal drinking age.
* Progress continues to be made in the fight against underage drinking according to the 2004-05 Pride Survey. The National Summary of the Pride Survey, again recorded an all time low level, and a statistically significant decrease, in the number of students who reported they drank alcohol in the past year.
* According to the 19th Annual Pride Survey, among all students in grades 6 to 12, reported annual and monthly consumption of any alcohol product decreased significantly from the previous school year. Annual consumption rates decreased from 47.2 percent in the 2004-05 school year to 45.4 in 2005-06 — a statistically significant decrease and record low level. Monthly consumption decreased from 22.5 percent in 2004-05 to 21.4 in the current survey school year — a statistically significant one year decrease.
* The 2006 Monitoring the Future study also showed declining alcohol consumption among American youth, although, alcohol consumption continues to be widespread among today's youth. The prevalence measures (lifetime and annual) for alcohol consumption showed significant decline among 12th graders.
* Four out of ten students have consumed alcohol at least once by the end of eighth grade and slightly more than seven out of ten students have done so by the end of high school. That is, 41% of eighth grade students, 62% of tenth graders, and 73% of twelfth graders report they have tried alcohol. The figures represent a lifetime alcohol consumption decline of nearly one percentage point among 8th graders, declines of nearly two percent among 10th graders and two percentage points among 12th graders, a statistically significant one-year decline over the past year for high school seniors.
* Additionally, the 2006 Monitoring the Future survey revealed a statistically significant decline in the annual rate of alcohol consumption 12th graders from 2005 to 2006, with all three grade levels reaching record low levels over the past decade. Annual consumption among 8th grade and 10th grade students declined only slight from 2005 to 2006, while 12th grade students' annual prevalence declined two percentage points from 68.6 to 66.5. Annual consumption rates among 8th and 10th graders for 2006 were 34% and 56%, respectively.
* Thirty-day alcohol consumption remained relatively unchanged among 8th and 10th graders with prevalence rates of 17% and 34%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, past 30-day alcohol consumption rates declined nearly two percent among high school seniors from 47% in 2005 to 45.3% in 2006, a new record low. Additionally, binge drinking (having five or more drinks in a row) decreased nearly two percent among 12th graders in 2006, marking another historical low level at 27%.
* The one-year one percentage point declines noted in the 2006 Monitoring the Future Study, while not always statistically significant, are notable because they reflect a longer-term gradual decline in underage drinking.
* A qualitative research study conducted by Amica Insurance confirmed that teenagers whose parents talk with them versus talk at them might be less at risk to engage in harmful behavior involving alcohol. What's more, teens said they would be more apt not to drink and drive if they had heard directly from their parents how important they are to them.
* Only one in four teens in America (27 percent, about 6.5 million) lives with "hands-on" parents — parents who have established a household culture of rules and expectations for their teen's behavior and monitor what their teens do: such as the TV shows they watch, the CD's they buy, what they access on the Internet, and where they are spending evenings and weekends. These teens are at one quarter the risk of smoking, drinking and using drugs when compared with teens who have "hands-off" parents, according to a new survey of 1,000 American teens ages 12-17 conducted by The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA).
* According to the most recent wave of The TRU Study (Fall 2005) from Teenage Research Unlimited, drinking and driving continues to be an issue of great importance to teens. Three-fourths of teens (75%) cite drunk driving as an issue they care about, making it one of teens' top life-and-death issues and ranking it third overall, following education and child abuse and ahead of such issues as war, terrorism, economy, environment, drug abuse, cigarette smoking, racism, and abortion.
* Young drivers are over represented in both alcohol- and non-alcohol-related fatality rates. Alcohol-related fatality rates are nearly twice as high for 18-, 19- and 20-year-olds as for the population over 21. More than 40 percent of 18-, 19-, and 20- year-old crash fatalities are alcohol-related.
* In 2005 approximately 31.7 million people aged 12 and older drove under the influence of alcohol at least once during the past year. These data reflect a decrease of more than five percent from the 33.5 million persons reporting drinking in driving in the 2002 National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Driving under the influence of alcohol continues to be associated with age, with a peak among 21- to 25-year olds (28%).
o Eight percent of 16- and 17-year olds reported driving under the influence, and 20% of 18- to 20-year olds reported engaging in this behavior at least once in the past year.
* In 2004, among 15- to 20-year-old drivers, 29 percent of the drivers who were killed in motor vehicle crashes had been drinking. Additionally, for the same year and age group, 24 percent of these young drivers had BAC levels of .08 or higher.
* For young drivers age 15 to 20, alcohol involvement is higher among males than females. In 2004, 26 percent of young male drivers involved in fatal crashes had been drinking at the time of the crash, compared with 12 percent of young female drivers involved in fatal crashes.