Pages

Friday, March 13, 2020

Open Letter to UNF Athletics: What's Cool on Campus - Data Analytics (UPDATE)




JACKSONVILLE, FL - Update: This was a presentation made to relevant stakeholders in the success of UNF Baseball in September 2019 regarding the need to utilize data analytics to improve the team's chance of success in the current environment. 

Of the first seven teams on the UNF 2020 baseball schedule, five of them (Rutgers, South Carolina, Central Michigan, Ohio State and Illinois State) use data analytics to improve their team performance. We posted a 1-9 record against the schools listed. 

We didn't make much headway convincing the current administration that this was necessary back then. However, as we see from our 2020 schedule, the trend of adoption by other schools has accelerated since we presented. 

"You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality." - Ayn Rand

This is a look at UNF Baseball Historical W-L record. 



Here again, the trend is clearly not our friend. I don't even want to do a "What if " analysis or forecast sheet on when the program wakes up and realizes that this once proud program is playing to a sub- .500 Division I record. 

It's time to decide what type of program this is and what it wants to be going forward. Thankfully, there is not the pressure of a relegation system in place. Perhaps that would force action, but that shouldn't be the catalyst. Leadership and vision should have been. 

It's time to act and give these kids the tools they need to compete at the level the university chose to compete at. To do less is unfair to the kids. You cannot run a DI program on a DII budget. Finances should not be an issue as this isn't a particularly expensive proposition. 




NEED:

What's Cool on Campus? Charlie Young and Illinois baseball analytics


Illinois and Elon, among others, have improved their programs as a result of the technologies. There are benefits to future sport management and statistics majors to help implement and maintain the systems and produce reports. The cost of tools, like Flightscope, Rapsodo Yakkertech and Hawkeye, are reasonable considering the potential benefits. I believe that within 5-10 years, virtually all baseball programs around the country will be using these tools to improve their teams economically. 


‘If You Don’t Have It, You’re Behind’: College Baseball’s Tech Arms Race


“The technological wave that swept M.L.B. has reached college baseball, but the price of high-tech devices has created a bigger gulf between the haves and have-nots.” - www.nytimes.com

“Tech is the newest recruiting tool in Division I, the latest separator between haves and have-nots.”


Forbes Magazine seems to agree with this revolution. In an article about new technology in baseball, it says “Tech is the newest recruiting tool in Division I, the latest separator between haves and have-nots. 

Six of the eight schools that reached the College World Series — all but Louisville and Texas Tech — said they had purchased high-end analytic devices in the last two years

“Why Technology Defines the Future of Baseball”


It doesn’t matter who you ask these days. Twins reliever Taylor Rogers was quoted on MLB.com saying that due to new technology he’s learned more in the past month than in the past four or five years.” Blue Jays righty Ryan Tepera says, “That’s the new phase of baseball we are in.”

“Technology Pioneers See First-Mover Advantage”


By far the most intriguing finding in the research is the correlation between the early adoption of new technology and company performance. Pioneers are growing faster than other companies and beating their competition. Twenty percent have experienced more than 30% growth—twice that of Followers and more than three times that of the Cautious. Firms that identified themselves as Cautious were the most likely to report no growth.


IMPACT / EFFICACY / CALL TO ACTION / URGENCY:

Growing number of programs finding or renewing success: (2019 record versus 2011-18 record)


Teams that are known adopters of a data analytics driven approach have averaged between 3.98 – 5.61 additional wins over their prior eight years average wins, a proxy for their “true talent level” or expected number of wins per season. 

Nine of Eleven (82%) teams experienced success and two (18%) had down years. Of those that experience gains in wins, those gains ranged between (1.3 – 19.0) additional wins and averaged (5.61) additional wins.

From UNF baseball’s perspective, their eight-year prior record averaged 33W - 23.5L, a plus or minus swing of 5 games results in either an expected record of between 38-19 or 28-29. A record of 33-24 would be the mid-point, approximately where the team finished in 2019.  

The future options are somewhere between a team with legitimate post season aspirations and potential Top 25 ranking and one that has little or no post season expectations, with maintaining current position in the conference, a possible, but not attractive third option based on the fast changing environment.   

Two of nine conference foes have technology (22%) which mirrors estimate of penetration in Division I schools overall. Twenty-two percent equals 66 of 300 DI schools, basically equal to number of teams in the Power Conferences.

This is when the train is moving slow and you can still jump on board. The next stage, when early majority and late majority schools get on board, competitive gains will slowly erode to zero and then negative.

In terms of the 300 DI baseball schools, UNF ranks right somewhere between the 40-50th percentile based on recent performance. As shown by the technology adoption curve below, UNF ranks somewhere between early and late majority adopters (50th percentile). The pace of adoption from 22% to 50% penetration will accelerate and likely not take another 2-3 years.

As both the NYT and Forbes articles above suggest, within another two to three years, the opportunity to be a leader or an early adopter will have been lost.  The train will have left the station; laggards will be punished by their faster acting competition (see Technology Adoption Curve illustration below).

Accelerated by digital: A timeline of technology adoption curves, shifts in industry are exponential not incremental. Stand out or step back is the by-word.



Rogers Technology Adoption Curve meets Elitzur’s decreased comparative advantage

URGENCY:

“Moneyball advantage peters out once everyone's doing it” - author Ramy Elitzur, the Edward J. Kernaghan Professor of Financial Analysis and associate professor of accounting at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management.

Paper shows baseball data analytics only an advantage when few used it


When you have a secret sauce and nobody else knows about it, you have a competitive advantage. Once the secret sauce was outed, which was what happened with the book, everybody could imitate the Oakland A's."
Dr. Elitzur created a database for the study, inputting information from 1985 to 2013 about team payrolls, playoff success, the spread of data analytics use, and players' overall contributions to their team, represented by a key statistic from Moneyball's "sabermetrics," -- the type of data the Oakland A's used to identify lower-priced, undervalued players through statistics such as how much time spent on base.
He found that between 1997 and 2001, there were only two "Moneyball" teams in the MLB. Another three teams had taken up the practice by 2002. 

By 2013, more than 75 percent of MLB teams were using it. Sabermetrics gave teams the strongest advantage up until 2003, the year Moneyball was published. 

By 2008, the comparative advantage was lost as more and more teams adopted sabermetrics. The practice of data analytics also spread beyond sports, to business and government.

Other /ancillary benefits created between teams and schools within the university:


UNEXPLORED OPPORTUNITIES – CLUBS ON CAMPUS

Tracking data takes time and time is limited, explicitly by the NCAA and by the volume of tasks coaches must take on just to keep programs afloat and on-budget.

However, there are students right now who are:
1.            Analytically-minded
2.            Willing to work for free (class projects, practicums and internships)
3.            Love baseball

Students can be found in most school’s computer science/math/economics clubs. This is an area of opportunity that small schools have that is underutilized. Aid and assistance from students / clubs, in addition to generating buzz for the teams and the university can help baseball the most, given the recent rejection of a third paid assistant coach.

Player development analytics is currently a wide-open field. No MLB team is going to make their sensitive, proprietary player data available to the public. Talented analytics people, those who aspire to the MLB analytics jobs of the future, don’t have a lot with which to work.

Schools can develop this as an opportunity zone for students. A couple of seasons of analyzing player data adds real-world experience to enhance their resume for MLB internships / jobs. The insights they can uncover helps the team win games. It’s a win-win situation.


THE REVOLUTION REACHES COLLEGES….and SOFTBALL!!


This revolution has continued to spread, most recently reaching college baseball. Upwards of 50 colleges are collecting in-game data. Another 40 to 50 have bullpen units to assist with improving pitching. BaseballCloud has emerged as a great database company with analytics to assist the coaches. The momentum is clearly there now, and teams are all looking for technology they can implement to improve their team.

The data revolution is now starting to be recognized in softball. At least one major program is installing an in-game system

Softball academies are popping up, as are large facilities for holding very large tournaments – and these facilities are interested in in-game systems as well. The price point is reasonable, and coaches are understanding the value for player development.

“When performance is measured, performance improves. And when it is then reported, improvement occurs again.”

These coaches leading the data revolution in softball also see the value in being able to better recognize high school players for recruiting.

At Yakkertech, we are so excited to be a participant in supporting softball programs. Our in-game and bullpen system are ideal for enhancing player development. So to all the folks in the softball world – enjoy the revolution! It’s here!


Player development is a key element in baseball. There is one somewhat simple metric that shows the changes now in the “how and where” of the development of young, promising players. In the past 10 years, the percentage of players chosen in the first ten rounds of the draft from colleges has gone from 52% to over 75%.

While some colleges are also using technology and more scientific methods to enhance player development, they are still hounded by W’s and L’s to validate their existence as a coach. But that being said, many colleges now see that they can enhance performance of their players by having the technology and priority to use to make their players better……..Academies and colleges – that’s where players are obviously getting better……Makes things easier for the MLB, and they obviously see it!


BUDGET – FEASIBILITY & CONSTRAINTS:


TIER 2 – SMALL TO MEDIUM INVESTMENT
These can be applied in stages, one per year. Or, with a dialed in process for collecting data, you can do a big fundraiser to scrape together the $10,000-$15,000 it will take to purchase this all at once.

Note: @ $9K - $27K expenditure per sport (for Rapsodo H&P + Flightscope) implies approx. $1.8K-5.4K depreciation/replacement expense per year

References:

Elitzur, Ramy. “Data analytics effects in major league baseball.” (2020).


No comments:

Post a Comment