Saturday, March 15, 2008

2008 NFL Draft - Top 100



Potential deals for either Matt Ryan, the top rated QB available, or Darren McFadden, a potential difference maker at RB, could change everything. But here are the top rated players that should cover your favorite teams selections on the first day.

If you're sitting on the couch watching the second day selections, then shame on you, you need to get a life.

I like Aqib Talib from Kansas for the G-Men, so far. We'll have to see of he stays in the slot or rises as we approach the draft.

Rashard Mendenhall from Illinois could be another difference maker at RB. He is currently moving rapidly up the charts.

Vernon Gholston is the combine freak of this draft, maybe more so than Howie's son, Chris, who sits at the top spot. Gholston posted a 4.58 40 yd. dash and a 42 inch vertical jump.

QB Joe Flacco is also moving up the charts at QB, reminds me too much of Scott Brunner (same school and height) but he has a cannon for an arm (unlike Brunner).

Rank UP/DN Name School Pos Ht Wt 40 yd
1 Chris Long Virginia DE 6-4 275 4.78
2 Glenn Dorsey LSU DT 6-3 316 5.09
3 Darren McFadden Arkansas RB 6-2 210 4.42
4 Jake Long Michigan OT 6-7 315 5.08
5 Sedrick Ellis USC DT 6-1 308 4.96
6 UP Vernon Gholston Ohio State DE 6-4 258 4.58
7 Matt Ryan Boston College QB 6-5 224 4.79
8 Ryan Clady Boise State OT 6-6 316 5.28
9 Keith Rivers USC OLB 6-2 236 4.63
10 UP Derrick Harvey Florida DE 6-5 252 4.72
11 UP Jonathan Stewart Oregon RB 5-11 235 4.48
12 DN Michael Jenkins South Florida CB 6-0 200 4.49
13 UP Rashard MendenhallIllinois RB 5-11 210 4.48
14 DN DeSean Jackson California WR 6-0 178 4.32
15 Leodis McKelvin Troy CB 5-11 190 4.44
16 UP Dan Connor Penn State ILB 6-3 233 4.67
17 DN Brian Bohm Louisville QB 6-3 227 4.79
18 DN Chris Williams Vanderbilt OT 6-6 320 5.29
19 UP Dom.Rodgers-Cromartie Tenn St CB 6-2 183 4.44
20 DN Kenny Phillips Miami FS 6-2 208 4.46
21 UP Malcolm Kelly Oklahoma WR 6-4 218 4.54
22 UP Jeff Otah Pittsburgh OT 6-6 340 5.36
23 UP Phillip Merling Clemson DE 6-5 272 4.73
24 DN Anotine Cason Arizona CB 6-0 190 4.54
25 DN James Hardy Indiana WR 6-6 220 4.59
26 Kentawn Balmer North Carolina DT 6-5 308 5.12
27 DN Felix Jones Arkansas RB 6-0 200 4.39
28 UP Jamaal Charles Texas RB 6-1 200 4.39
29 DN Early Doucet LSU WR 6-0 211 4.54
30 DN Fred Davis USC TE 6-3 250 4.76
31 UP Aqib Talib Kansas CB 6-2 202 4.52
32 UP Quentin Groves Auburn OLB 6-3 250 4.46
33 Anthony Collins Kansas OT 6-6 308 5.08
34 DN Calais Campbell Miami DE 6-8 282 4.85
35 DN Chad Henne Michigan QB 6-3 228 5.18
36 Curtis Lofton Oklahoma ILB 6-0 238 4.73
37 UP Limas Sweed Texas WR 6-4 212 4.58
38 Xavier Adibi Virginia OLB 6-2 220 4.54
39 Andre Caldwell Florida WR 6-1 207 4.41
40 DN Mario Manningham Michigan WR 6-0 185 4.48
41 Chris Johnson East Carolina RB 5-11 195 4.27
42 UP Devin Thomas Michigan State WR 6-2 215 4.50
43 Sam Baker USC OT 6-5 308 5.09
44 DN Reggie Smith Oklahoma CB 6-1 198 4.57
45 Martellus Bennett Texas A&M TE 6-7 248 4.79
46 Mike Pollak Arizona CB 6-4 299 4.98
47 Erin Henderson Maryland OLB 6-3 242 4.67
48 DN Ali Highsmith LSU OLB 6-0 229 4.56
49 UP Charles Godfrey Iowa CB 6-0 207 4.38
50 UP Joe Flacco Delaware QB 6-6 232 4.92
51 DN Tracy Porter Indiana CB 5-11 185 4.38
52 Ray Rice Rutgers RB 5-9 195 4.53
53 UP Trevor Laws Notre Dame DT 6-1 297 5.18
54 DN Pat Smith Auburn DT 6-4 312 4.98
55 DN Andre Woodson Kentucky QB 6-4 234 4.81
56 Gosder Cherilus Boston College OT 6-7 315 5.14
57 UP Darrell Robertson Georgia Tech DE 6-4 247 4.76
58 Jerod Mayo Tennessee ILB 6-2 230 4.67
59 DN Lawrence Jackson USC DE 6-5 261 4.89
60 Carl Nicks Nebraska OT 6-5 343 5.23
61 Donnie Avery Houston WR 5-11 186 4.34
62 Earl Bennett Vanderbilt WR 6-1 205 4.52
63 DN John Carlson Notre Dame TE 6-5 256 4.72
64 UP Brandon Flowers Virginia Tech CB 5-10 190 4.47
65 Steve Slaton West Virginia RB 5-10 195 4.42
66 Steve Justice Wake Forest C 6-3 289 5.14
67 UP Cliff Avril Purdue DE 6-3 252 4.78
68 Terrell Thomas USC CB 6-1 197 4.57
69 Branden Albert Virginia OG 6-7 315 5.37
70 Red Bryant Texas A&M DT 6-5 326 5.16
71 Simeon Castille Alabama FS 6-0 190 4.62
72 Martin Rucker Missouri TE 6-5 248 4.69
73 Bruce Davis UCLA OLB 6-3 241 4.69
74 Phillip Wheeler Georgia Tech ILB 6-3 245 4.62
75 Oniel Cousins Texas El-Paso OT 6-4 301 5.06
76 John David Booty USC QB 6-3 213 4.92
77 Geno Hayes Florida State OLB 6-2 220 4.67
78 Eddie Royal Virginia Tech WR 5-10 182 4.39
79 UP Dustin Keller Purdue TE
80 Roy Schuenig Orego State OG 6-4 308 5.19
81 Josh Johnson San Diego QB 6-3 198 4.74
82 UP Kevin Smith Central Florida RB
83 Tavares Gooden Miami ILB 6-1 233 4.54
84 Dwight Lowery San Jose State CB 6-1 185 4.55
85 UP DaJuan Morgan N. Carolina St FS
86 Marcus Griffin Texas FS 5-11 198 4.58
87 Mike Hart Michigan RB 5-9 195 4.57
88 Lavelle Hawkins California WR 5-11 187 4.48
89 Marcus Howard Georgia OLB 6-2 245 4.66
90 John Sullivan Notre Dame C 6-4 284 5.23
91 Jonathan Hefney Tennessee FS 5-9 185 4.47
92 Chris Ellis Virginia Tech DE 6-4 260 4.74
93 Heath Benedict Newberry OT 6-5 321 4.99
94 Jamar Adams Michigan SS 6-2 209 4.52
95 Johnny Dingle West Virginia DE 6-3 273 4.84
96 Brad Cottam Tennessee TE 6-8 271 4.74
97 John Greco Toledo OT 6-5 320 5.28
98 Matt Forte Tulane RB 6-1 221 4.56
99 D.J. Parker Virginia Tech FS 6-0 195 4.50
100 Dre Moore Maryland DT 6-4 307 5.04

Thursday, March 13, 2008

THE ARGUMENT....AND MEMORIES OF REEFER MADNESS





I'm going to give credit to the blog Steroid_Nation for outlining the major arguments for Congressional involvement in the PED issue in sports.



Then I'm going to outline why I think it's almost entirely wrong and in fact shockingly weak argument coming from a university professor.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2008/03/congression-wei.html





So why should Congress pursue Clemens as well as

investigate anabolic steroids, HGH, and other PEDs?



* Because the truth is an important ethical

concept worth defending. Perjury remains a serious

issue.



CS - I can't argue against truth, justice or the American Way. But to put in context, Congress called Clemens in to "perjure" himself, and it is normally the domain of the law enforcement agencies to investigate crimes. Congress was basically a willing tool of the owners and Bud Selig to get the kind of movement on the issue from the Players Association that they never would have been able to achieve on their own. Should Congress be inserting themselves in labor/management issues?



* Because steroid and PED use (like HGH)

represents a hugely lucrative illegal industry for

organized crime



CS - Doubtful. Anecdotally you may be able to come up with a case or two here and there with links to organized crime, but "the mob" tends to focus on those goods (cocaine, heroin) and services (gambling, racketeering) that are not readily available to the masses. Unfortunately, steroids and PED's are available via our neighbors to the south (Mexico) as well as the Dominican, to say nothing about the Internet. That said, enforcement of the law, is for the local police, FBI, DEA, etc. to work out. Congress makes laws, it doesn't enforce them. Perhaps Congress should have held hearings into why the laws that were on the books were not enforced as they now, with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight, believe they should have been. Why didn't the FBI follow up on Operation Equine in the 90's?



* Because PED distribution supports a

gazillion-dollar underground network that includes

money-laundering and income-tax fraud



CS - Gazillion is not a real number, but I've heard juveniles use it before to indicate a ridiculously large number. (Gazillion and other fictitious numbers from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indefinite_and_fictitious_numbers )

Further, you are simply repeating your last point here in an attempt to pad (juice) the numbers and make your argument stronger. In reality, it's the same point.




* Because the PED (steroids and other drugs)

distribution networks also distribute other illegal

drugs including narcotics and stimulants



CS - Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy. Same argument as the prior two really, only weaker.



* Because these drugs are also obtained from AIDs

patients, thus diverting legally prescribed

pharmaceutics to illegal activities



CS - How prevalent is this really? Is this another attempt to play the emotional card? First it's "we're protecting the nation's youth" now we're protecting against those who would prey on unfortunate AIDS patients? Come on. Surely, you're aware of the old lawyers saw "When you have the facts on your side, pound the facts, when you have the law on your side pound the law, when you have neither, pound the table"? Seems like a lot of table pounding so far.



* Because the use of these drugs amounts to

practicing medicine without a license



CS - By the same logic would the aforementioned AIDS patients selling their prescriptions constitute practicing as a Pharmacist without a license? So anyone who takes a drug, without their own prescription, is practicing medicine without a license? That's a new legal theory on me, can you cite precedent for this? Or is this more table pounding?



* Because the use of illegal PEDs defrauds the

paying public who are deceived by the drug-cheats;

this constitutes fraud



CS - Again, I think I would stay away from the legal theory, it's doesn't seem to suit you. It seems like you're stretching the legal definition of fraud to suit your cause. I know of only one case (it's still pending, but we've cited it here http://slavieboy.blogspot.com/2008/01/i-smell-refund.html ), where a ticket holder sued a team for fraud as a result of this. I would think team ownership could more sue a player for fraud (as in Giambi) and get out of a bad contract, but even that hasn't been tested yet. I wonder why. I think the onus is on the owners (employers) to take action against the players (employees) for the fraud you're describing. The fan would seem to have action against the team owners for any fraud in the purchase of the ticket. And I'm not sure there is a winnable case there.



Speaking of fraud though, an example you might be more familiar with is described below. The disgraceful state of education in this country. Tuition costs rising significantly faster than the overall inflation rate, while university endowment funds grow faster than oil company profits.

----------------------------------------------------

FROM THE BLOG CARPE DIEM: DISTURBING VIDEO ON DECLINE OF MATH SKILLS

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2008/03/disturbing-video-on-decline-of-math.html



Q: What does a major state university do when test scores on a precalculus math exam for incoming freshmen continue to decline year after year, while at the same time high school GPAs of incoming freshmen are going up?



A: If your answer is "make the test easier," go to the head of the class!



Watch a disturbing video on the decline in math skills for college students (click twice on the arrow above), with an explanation for why it has been happening ("reform math"), and some ways to solve the problem (abandon "reform math").



Thanks to Oak Norton for the pointer.



See a previous CD post on the huge shortage of IT professionals and the lack of technology talent in the U.S.. Thanks to "reform math," that huge shortage will likely continue.

-----------------------------------

MATH EDUCATION: A UNIVERSITY VIEW









---------------------------------------------------

* Because many MLB games are played in public

financed venues, that raises issues of misuse of

public funds when the games are not fairly played



CS - The publicly financed venues you cite are generally state and local funds so it would seem to be more their concern then that of Uncle Sammy. They have used the tax exemption hook to stick their nose under the tent so to speak, but even that is weak argument. And you know what happens once the camel sticks his nose under the tent don't you? Sure you do, it's not long before you have a camel in your tent. If I attend a rock concert at the same venue, where there is marijuana/alcohol abuse and perhaps other illicit drug use going on all around me (and let's face it, what other kind of rock concert is there?) then using the same legal theory, shouldn't I expect Congress to get involved in the name of reducing/stamping out recreational drug/alcohol use?



* Because that the trafficking of PEDs though

players that use, trainers that distribute, or

street-dealers that sell, represents illegal drug

activity, certainly answerable to the federal

government and the FBI



CS - We're back to the CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, LAW ENFORCEMENT argument again. Redundant.



* Because illegal PEDs likely made their way

through international checkpoints (like Canada) with

players breaking international regulations (see Juan

Gonzalez's story)



CS - We're back to the CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, LAW ENFORCEMENT argument again. Redundant.



* Because that it is clear youngsters under 18 use

PEDs (steroids and others) based somewhat on their

idol's use of PEDs



CS - Oh, Thank God. Protect the young people!!! Why is this so far down the list when it appears to most to be the number one reason for Congressional involvement. Let's get our priorities in order shall we, Professor? You say "somewhat" but if you look at the most recent issue of Sports Illustrated they cite their own polling that shows 99% of America's youth (99% PERCENT), would not, I repeat, WOULD NOT use steroids or PED's simply because their favorite athlete did.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/03/11/steroid.survey/index.html



Further, 97% said they would not use PED's even if they knew it would make them a better player. So it seems like kids are a lot smarter then we are giving them credit for. This restores my faith in the youth and makes me question more the faith in adults who would use condescending arguments from the "Reefer Madness" era to make their case in this issue. Makes me wonder if future generations are going to laugh just as much about our handling of this issue as our parents and grandparents handled the marijuana issue. Kids are not little idiots and should not be treated as such.




* Because these illegal drugs produce serious

medical side-effects, which in themselves are cause

for concern, but also represent a major public health

problem



* Because there is evidence the PEDs are addictive



CS - MEDICAL ISSUE - Two arguments for the price of one redundancy again. Now we're getting somewhere, let's let the AMA and Big Pharma decide this, they haven't screwed too many modern day issues up with their incompetence and corruption.



* Because illegal anabolic steroids have been

shown to be involved in felonious crimes beyond drug

trafficking -- crimes like murder, assault, and rape.



CS - We're back to the CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, LAW ENFORCEMENT argument again. Redundant. Nice touch by adding the murder, assault, rape emotional kicker. Did you forget about child molestation?



* Because the US Olympic team, which is obviously

a visible ambassador to the world, appears to be

violated by the drug-cheats and the PED dealers



CS - Then they would fit right in with the most corrupt organization involved in sports the International Olympic Committee. It wouldn't bother me at all if we didn't participate at all in that sham and for many reasons that have nothing to do with the PED issue. I didn't miss it at all when we boycotted the Olympics.



CS - Seriously Professor, if one of your students turned in a paper with these arguments and you didn't throw it right back into his face for a re-write than I wonder about our so-called institutions of higher-learning. Feel free to rebut.

------------------------------------------------------------

FROM THE REEFER MADNESS ERA: OR THE MORE THINGS CHANGE....THE MORE THEY REMAIN THE SAME



http://www.reefermadness.org/propaganda/trail_a.html







Another excerpt from On the Trail of Marihuana, the Weed of Madness:



"We now know that marihuana --



1. Destroys will power, making a jellyfish of the user. He cannot say no.

2. Eliminates the line between right and wrong, and substitues one's own warped desires

or the base suggestions of others as the standard of right.

3. Above all, causes crime; fills the victim with an irrepressible urge to violence.

4. Incites to revolting immoralities, including rape and murder.

5. Causes many accidents, but industrial and automobile.

6. Ruins careers forever.

7. Causes insanity as its specialty.

8. Either in self-defense or as a means of revenue, users make smokers of others, thus perpetuating the evil."



[italics were not added, they appeared in the original source]



Source: On the Trail of Marihuana the Weed of Madness by Earle Albert Rowell & Robert Rowell, Pacific Press Publishing, 1939, p. 33



---------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.reefermadness.org/propaganda/congress.html





Hearing Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Finance United States Senate, Seventy-Fifth Congress, First Session on H.R.6906 - July 12, 1937 Excerpt from statement of Federal Bureau of Narcotics chief Harry J. Anslinger



MR. ANSLINGER





I received this letter from an attorney at Houston, Texas, just the other day. This case involves a murder in which he alleges that his client, a boy 19 years old, had been addicted to the use of marihuana.

SENATOR BROWN





Shall we read this into the record?

MR. ANSLINGER





Yes, sir; I shall be very glad if you will.





(The letter is as follows:)



Houston, Tex., July 7, 1937



H. J. Anslinger United States Commissioner of Narcotics Washington, DC



Dear sir: Your article on Marihuana appearing in the July issue of the American is very useful as well as interesting. this subject strikes close to home because of a client II have who not so long ago murdered in a brutal way a man who had befriended him in giving him a ride. This client is a boy 20 years of age and he explained to me he has been smoking marihuana for several years. I would like to have about 1 copies of your article and will gladly pay any necessary charges. I would appreciate an early reply.



Yours Truly, Sidney Benbow

MR. ANSLINGER





I have another letter from the prosecutor at a place in New Jersey. It is as follows:





The Interstate Commission on Crime March 18, 1937



Charles Schwarz, Washington, DC



My Dear Mr. Schwarz: That I fully appreciate the need for action, you may judge from the fact that last January I tried a murder case for several days, of a particularly brutal character in which one colored young man killed another, literally smashing his face and head to a pulp, as the enclosed photograph demonstrates.



One of the defenses was that the defendant's intellect was so prostrated from his smoking marihuana cigarettes that he did not know what he was doing. The defendant was found guilty and sentenced to a long term of years. I am convinced that marihuana had been indulged in, that the smoking had occurred, and the brutality of the murder was accounted for by the narcotic, though the defendant's intellect had not been totally prostrate, so the verdict was legally correct. It seems to me that this instance might be of value to you in your campaign.



Sincerely yours, Richard Hartshorne



(Mr. Hartshorne is a member of the Interstate Commission on Crime. We have many cases of this kind.)

SENATOR BROWN





It affects them that way?

MR. ANSLINGER





Yes.

SENATOR DAVIS





(viewing a photograph presented by Mr. Anslinger) Was there in this case a blood or skin disease caused by marihuana?

MR. ANSLINGER





No; this is a photograph of the murdered man, Senator. It shows the fury of the murderer.

SENATOR BROWN



That is terrible.



MORE REEFER MADNESS MADNESS: This is good reading, see if you can spot the parallels between current events and the events as described here.



http://www.reefermadness.org/propaganda/essay.html



http://www.reefermadness.org/propaganda/essay2.html



---------------------------------------------------------------

Some of the more positive suggestions I've seen from one of the few Congressmen that I thought acquitted himself well during the Clemens hearing.



FROM CONGRESSMAN ELIJAH CUMMINGS (D-MD) WEBSITE





http://www.house.gov/cummings/newsletter/050808.htm

http://www.house.gov/cummings/newsletter/050808.htm





Congressman Cummings Expresses Disappointment in

Baseball Star's Steroid Use



In continuing to take an active role in opposing the

tolerance of steroid use in professional sports,

Congressman Cummings expressed disappointment with

regard to the news that broke on August 1 that Orioles

baseball player Rafael Palmeiro was suspended for

steroid use.



He continued by noting that when sports leagues ignore

this type of cheating, they send a message to the

public that steroid abuse is acceptable.



"Unfortunately, this perception has contributed to an

increase of the drug's abuse by teens from 1 in 45 ten

years ago to 1 in 16 (and in some surveys, 1 in 8)


today. Further, the players' unscrupulous actions send

a message to young children-many of whom try to

emulate their sports heroes-that steroids are safe."



Congressman Cummings said that he would continue to

urge Congressional Leaders to expedite consideration

by the full Congress of The Clean Sports Act of 2005

(H.R. 2565/S.1114) which he has co-sponsored with his

House colleagues Congressmen Davis, Waxman and Mark

Souder (R-Indiana). Senator John McCain (R-Arizona)

has introduced companion legislation in the Senate.



Specifically, the Clean Sports Act of 2005 would

require these professional leagues to:



1. Expel athletes for two years for their first

steroid-abuse violation and impose a lifetime ban for

a second violation;



2. Adopt a comprehensive list of prohibited

performance-enhancing drugs;



3. Test each player on an unannounced basis at least

three times during the regular season and twice during

the off-season; and



4. Finally, in an effort to ensure balance, the

legislation guarantees that players who test positive

receive their due process rights, including the right

to notice, a fair, timely, and expedited hearing, the

right to be represented by counsel, and the right to

appeal.




CS Note - This provision, albeit the American Way, would not satisfy the USADA, WADA Nazi's who use tactics to counteract that would not past serious legal muster in this country. So I would urge caution when listening to these purveyors of information on the topic, their agenda and methodology is wholly un-American.



"Passage of this legislation would send a strong

message to the public and especially to young people

that no one wins when athletes cheat," Congressman

Cummings said.


YANKEES CLASS IN MID-SEASON FORM


------------------------------------------------------
TAMPA, Fla. (AP) -- Shelley Duncan watched video of his hard slide in the Yankees' game Wednesday against Tampa Bay and still doesn't think it was a dirty play.

The New York first baseman's slide into second base with his spikes raised sparked a bench-clearing scrum that resulted in two players and two coaches being ejected during the second inning of Wednesday's contest with the Rays.

"I saw it a couple times," Duncan said Thursday. "I still don't understand why they were as upset as they were."

Duncan, who had hinted at the prospect of retaliating for the Rays' Elliot Johnson barreling over New York catcher Francisco Cervelli last Saturday, spiked second baseman Akinori Iwamura in the right thigh and was immediately tossed.

--------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if we can't clear this up for the seemingly baseball retarded Shelley Duncan.

You "hinted" at retaliation for the previous games dust up.

Then after your team, presumably with the input of the new manager Joe Girardi, brushes back Evan Longorian (a time honored baseball practice) you take it upon yourself to perform a mid-game, middle of the field cup check on the Rays second baseman by sliding with your spikes somewhere in the proximity of said second baseman's genitals.

Do I have it right so far genius?

I have to tell you, even in a beer league softball game, a slide like that invites, check that encourages, a stinging right cross to your jaw. Got it, douchebag?
Way to wear the usually classy Yankee pinstripes with class and dignity. You're really sending a message to the other team all right. Look out, we're the Yankees.

Good for Johny Gomes, for attempting to knock your sorry ass into left field.

I guess it's "look out world, we're the Yankees". Nobody bowls over our catcher, even if he is blocking the plate.

Maybe your manager, a former catcher, should put one of those red shirts that the QB's wear in training camp so they don't get hit. If not I'm sure you fellas can borrow a skirt from the A-Rod collection.
HAHAHAHAHA.
-------------------------------
UPDATE: A fish rots from the head down

New York Post: Hank Steinbrenner: We're not Going to Take It!!
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03152008/sports/yankees/hank__were_not_going_to_take_it_102070.htm

Hank using the "we pay these guys revenue sharing dollars, therefore they should be our bitches" argument. This demonstrates why the revenue sharing/revenue disparity problem is one of the biggest integrity of the game issues baseball faces.

Steinbrenner's exact quote from the article:
"I don't want these teams in general to forget who subsidizes a lot of them, and it's the Yankees New York Yankees , the Red Sox, Dodgers, New York Mets ," he said. "I would prefer if teams want to target the Yankees that they at least start giving some of that revenue sharing and luxury tax money back. From an owners point of view, that's my point.

When the owner is an insufferable twit, is it any wonder that it flows through the organization, down through the manager and inevitably to the players as well?

Kudos to the Yankee veterans who reportedly took Shelley Duncan aside and hopefully told him about the Yankee way. Maybe because he has a girls name he has a subconscious need to overcompensate and prove his "manhood" to the fellas, but c'mon dude.

2008 NL East Preview




PREDICTED ORDER OF FINISH:
New York Mets
Philadelphia Phillies
Atlanta Braves
Washington Nationals
Florida Marlins

The Mets, stung by last years late season collapse, came back with a vengeance. Johan Santana makes Pedro Martinez a #2 starter and a bonus if he comes back. The Phillies and Braves will nip at their heels all year before falling off late. The Nationals will be in no mans land between the haves and the have-not Marlins.

New York Mets
Pitching - Johan Santana, a healthy Pedro Martinez and John Maine comprise a strong starting staff. Oliver Perez and Orlando Hernandez may push Mike Pelfrey to the pen. Billy Wagner still throwing heat as the closer with Aaron Heilman setting up. Jorge Sosa, Scott Schoenweis and Pedro Feliciano provide depth.

Lineup - Revamped the lineup with addition Brian Schneider C and Ryan Church RF coming over from the Nats. Carlos Delgado 1B, Luis Castillo 2B combine with David Wright 3B and Jose Reyes SS to form the most potent infield in the league. Moises Alou LF and Carlos Beltran CF are prolific when healthy. Former Cub Angel Pagan and Endy Chavez are around when they are not.

Prospects - Are you serious? See Twins report, they emptied the cupboard for Santana. RHP's Brant Rustich amd Kevin Mulvey may contribute this year. Fernando Martinez F may help down the road.

Philadelphia Phillies
Pitching - Strong. Very strong. Cole Hamels, Jamie Moyer and Brett Myers form the Big Three. Adam Eaton and Kyle Kendrick are likely the other starters. Brad Lidge comes over from the Astros to close. Tom Gordon moves to setup, ready to close when Lidge blows up.

Lineup - The infield of 1B Ryan Howard, 2B Chase Utley, SS Jimmy Rollins and 3B Pedro Feliz has three potential MVP candidates and a guy named Pedro. Carlos Ruiz and Chris Coste platoon behind the dish. Pat Burrell LF and Shane Victorino CF are oined by RF Geoff Jenkins from the Brewers. Jayson Werth and So Taguci back up.

Prospects - LHP Joe Savery, a two way college player, is learning to pitch full-time.
He's close. Greg Golson OF is a potential five tool player. Andrew Carpenter RHP may contribute this year as well.

Atlanta Braves
Pitching - Tom Glavine joins golfing buddy John Smoltz and Tim Hudson to provide a decent starting staff. Buddy Carlyle, Chuck James and retread LHP Mike Hampton competing for the final two spots. Rafael Soriano and Mike Gonzalez will share the closing duties.

Lineup - Brian McCann should be an all-star candidate for the next ten years. Mark Texeira 1B and Chipper Jones 3B man the corners. Yunel Escobar SS hit .326 last year and Kelly Johnson 2B hit .276 with some pop (16 HR's). Underrated infield. Matt Diaz keeps LF warm for prospect Brandon Jones. Mark Kotsay likely does the same for Jorda Schafer. Jeff Francoeur should man RF in Atlanta for another 15 years.

Prospects - This team could get younger and better at the same time with Jordan Schafer CF, Brandon Jones LF and Brent Lillibridge SS joining the holdovers. Jason Heyward RF 18 years old may be the best, but a year or two away. Jair Jurrjens RHP is the spoils of the Renteria deal, could start this year.

Washington Nationals

Pitching - Young, very young. John Patterson, Shawn Hill and Jason Bergmann are the top three. Matt Chico, Tim Redding and Joe Hanrahan will compete for the final slots. Chad Cordero (37 saves) is an elite closer. Jon Rauch will oe as the set up man.

Lineup - Paul LoDuca was brought in from the Mets to catch. Dimitri Young 1B and Ryan Zimmerman 3B provide offense from the corners, although Young's power (13 HR's) has dropped off as his waistline has ballooned. Ronnie Belliard 2B and Cristian Guzman SS are steady if unspectacular. The outfield is crowded with Wily Mo Pena in LF looking to hold off the challenge of the mercurial Elijah Dukes. Lastings Milledge CF brings enormous potential from the Mets. Austin Kearns RF was second to Zimmerman (24-16) in HR's.

Prospects - LHP Ross Detwiler should be in the starting rotation shortly. OF Chris Marrero (19) and Michael Burgess (from Tampa, 19) are a couple of seasons away, but scouts are salivating over Burgess' power potential. John Smoker LHP, 19 is a polished, young pitcher who could move quickly.

Florida Marlins
Pitching - Also very young and talented. Scott Olsen, Sergio Mitre and Andrew Miller LHP from the Tigers headline the starters. Veteran Mark Hendrickson, Rick VanderHurk
and Ricky Nolasco will battle for the final two starters spots. Kevin Gregg (32 saves) will reel in any potential victories that present themselves. Taylor Tankersley is the set up man.

Lineup - Mike Rabelo and Matt Treanor split the catching duties. Mike Jacobs 1B (17 HR .265) and prospect Dallas McPherson 3B man the corners. Dan Uggla 2B (31 HR's .245) and Hanley Ramirez SS (29 HR's .332) shine up the middle. Ramirez is a superstar in the making. In the outfield, Josh Willingham LF (21 HR's) prospect Cameron Maybin CF and Jeremy Hermida RF (18 HR's) start in the outfield. Veterans Luis Gonzalez and Cody Ross will provide bench strength.

Prospects - Cameron Maybin CF from the Tigers is only 20 but he could be ready. Chris Volstad RHP could join the starting rotation shortly. Aaron Thompson LHP and Brett Sinkbell may be able to help this year as well.

Sunday, March 09, 2008

NY Times Article re: Performance Enchancing Drugs in Society at Large




Interesting thought in todays NYT regarding PED use in other areas of society. Note the claim that among high school students, abuse of prescription medications is second only to cannabis use. And remember where Congress chose to put its time and effort "to protect our nations youth".

When you only have a limited amount of resources available, time and money being too of the more precious resources, where you choose to pick your battles and why is certainly a valid point to debate when Congress goes off, half-cocked, on one of it's agenda shaping, dog and pony shows. And it is valid to ask the question "why are they doing this?" especially in light of the narrative presented in this story.-CS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/weekinreview/09carey.html?ex=1362805200&en=4c9d7fc024597717&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

Smartening Up

Brain Enhancement Is Wrong, Right?

By BENEDICT CAREY
Published: March 9, 2008

So far no one is demanding that asterisks be attached to Nobels, Pulitzers or Lasker awards. Government agents have not been raiding anthropology departments, riffling book bags, testing professors’ urine. And if there are illicit trainers on campuses, shady tutors with wraparound sunglasses and ties to basement labs in Italy, no one has exposed them.

Yet an era of doping may be looming in academia, and it has ignited a debate about policy and ethics that in some ways echoes the national controversy over performance enhancement accusations against elite athletes like Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens.

In a recent commentary in the journal Nature, two Cambridge University researchers reported that about a dozen of their colleagues had admitted to regular use of prescription drugs like Adderall, a stimulant, and Provigil, which promotes wakefulness, to improve their academic performance. The former is approved to treat attention deficit disorder, the latter narcolepsy, and both are considered more effective, and more widely available, than the drugs circulating in dorms a generation ago.

But is prescription tweaking to perform on exams, or prepare presentations and grants, really the same as injecting hormones to chase down a home run record, or win the Tour de France?

Some argue that such use could be worse, given the potentially deep impact on society. And the behavior of academics in particular, as intellectual leaders, could serve as an example to others.

In his book “Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution,” Francis Fukuyama raises the broader issue of performance enhancement: “The original purpose of medicine is to heal the sick, not turn healthy people into gods.” He and others point out that increased use of such drugs could raise the standard of what is considered “normal” performance and widen the gap between those who have access to the medications and those who don’t — and even erode the relationship between struggle and the building of character.

“Even though stimulants and other cognitive enhancers are intended for legitimate clinical use, history predicts that greater availability will lead to an increase in diversion, misuse and abuse,”
wrote Dr. Nora Volkow, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and James Swanson of the University of California at Irvine, in a letter to Nature. “Among high school students, abuse of prescription medications is second only to cannabis use.”

But others insist that the ethics are not so clear, and that academic performance is different in important ways from baseball, or cycling.

“I think the analogy with sports doping is really misleading, because in sports it’s all about competition, only about who’s the best runner or home run hitter,” said Martha Farah, director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania. “In academics, whether you’re a student or a researcher, there is an element of competition, but it’s secondary. The main purpose is to try to learn things, to get experience, to write papers, to do experiments. So in that case if you can do it better because you’ve got some drug on board, that would on the face of things seem like a plus.”

Surveys of college students have found that from 4 percent to 16 percent say they have used stimulants or other prescription drugs to improve their academic performance — usually getting the pills from other students.

“Suppose you’re preparing for the SAT, or going for a job interview — in those situations where you have to perform on that day, these drugs will be very attractive,” said Dr. Barbara Sahakian of Cambridge, a co-author with Sharon Morein-Zamir of the recent essay in Nature. “The desire for cognitive enhancement is very strong, maybe stronger than for beauty, or athletic ability.”

Dr. Anjan Chatterjee, an associate professor of neurology at the University of Pennsylvania who foresaw this debate in a 2004 paper, argues that the history of cosmetic surgery — scorned initially as vain and unnatural but now mainstream as a form of self-improvement — is a guide to predicting the trajectory of cosmetic neurology, as he calls it.

“We worship at the altar of progress, and to the demigod of choice,” Dr. Chatterjee said. “Both are very strong undercurrents in the culture and the way this is likely to be framed is: ‘Look, we want smart people to be as productive as possible to make everybody’s lives better. We want people performing at the max, and if that means using these medicines, then great, then we should be free to choose what we want as long as we’re not harming someone.’ I’m not taking that position, but we have this winner-take-all culture and that is the way it is likely to go.”

People already use legal performance enhancers, he said, from high-octane cafe Americanos to the beta-blockers taken by musicians to ease stage fright, to antidepressants to improve mood. “So the question with all of these things is, Is this enhancement, or a matter of removing the cloud over our better selves?” he said.

CREATINE SUPPLEMENTATION - International Society of Sports Nutrition Position




This should answer most of the questions that come up regarding the use of creatine and it's efficacy.

Of particular note:
3. There is no scientific evidence that the short- or long-term use of creatine monohydrate has any detrimental effects on otherwise healthy individuals.

4. If proper precautions and supervision are provided, supplementation in young athletes is acceptable and may provide a nutritional alternative to potentially dangerous anabolic drugs.

and 9. Creatine monohydrate has been reported to have a number of potentially beneficial uses in several clinical populations, and further research is warranted in these areas.

Enjoy the rest.-CS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Creatine
supplementation and exercise

International Society of Sports Nutrition, 600 Pembrook Drive,
Woodland Park, CO 80863, USA

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 2007,
4:6doi:10.1186/ 1550-2783- 4-6

Position Statement: The following nine points related to the use of
creatine as a nutritional supplement constitute the Position Statement
of the Society. They have been approved by the Research Committee of
the Society.

1. Creatine monohydrate is the most effective ergogenic nutritional
supplement currently available to athletes in terms of increasing
high-intensity exercise capacity and lean body mass during training.


2. Creatine monohydrate supplementation is not only safe, but possibly
beneficial in regard to preventing injury and/or management of select
medical conditions when taken within recommended guidelines.

3. There is no scientific evidence that the short- or long-term use of
creatine monohydrate has any detrimental effects on otherwise healthy
individuals.

4. If proper precautions and supervision are provided, supplementation
in young athletes is acceptable and may provide a nutritional
alternative to potentially dangerous anabolic drugs.


5. At present, creatine monohydrate is the most extensively studied
and clinically effective form of creatine for use in nutritional
supplements in terms of muscle uptake and ability to increase
high-intensity exercise capacity.


6. The addition of carbohydrate or carbohydrate and protein to a
creatine supplement appears to increase muscular retention of
creatine, although the effect on performance measures may not be
greater than using creatine monohydrate alone.

7. The quickest method of increasing muscle creatine stores appears to
be to consume ~0.3 grams/kg/day of creatine monohydrate for at least 3
days followed by 3–5 g/d thereafter to maintain elevated stores.
Ingesting smaller amounts of creatine monohydrate (e.g., 2–3 g/d) will
increase muscle creatine stores over a 3–4 week period, however, the
performance effects of this method of supplementation are less supported.

8. Creatine products are readily available as a dietary supplement and
are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Specifically, in 1994, U.S. President Bill Clinton signed into law the
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA). DSHEA allows
manufacturers/ companies/ brands to make structure-function claims;
however, the law strictly prohibits disease claims for dietary
supplements.

9. Creatine monohydrate has been reported to have a number of potentially beneficial uses in several clinical populations, and
further research is warranted in these areas.


The following literature review has been prepared by the authors in
support of the aforementioned position statement.

Creatine Supplementation and Exercise: A Review of the Literature
Introduction

The use of creatine as a sport supplement has been surrounded by both
controversy and fallacy since it gained widespread popularity in the
early 1990's. Anecdotal and media reports have often claimed that
creatine usage is a dangerous and unnecessary practice; often linking
creatine use to anabolic steroid abuse [1]. Many athletes and experts
in the field have reported that creatine supplementation is not only
beneficial for athletic performance and various medical conditions but
is also clinically safe [2-5]. Although creatine has recently been
accepted as a safe and useful ergogenic aid, several myths have been
purported about creatine supplementation which include:


1. All weight gained during supplementation is due to water retention.

2. Creatine supplementation causes renal distress.

3. Creatine supplementation causes cramping, dehydration, and/or
altered electrolyte status.

4. Long-term effects of creatine supplementation are completely unknown.

5. Newer creatine formulations are more beneficial than creatine
monohydrate (CM) and cause fewer side effects.

6. It's unethical and/or illegal to use creatine supplements.

While these myths have been refuted through scientific investigation,
the general public is still primarily exposed to the mass media which
may or may not have accurate information. Due to this confounding
information, combined with the fact that creatine has become one of
the most popular nutritional supplements on the market, it is
important to examine the primary literature on supplemental creatine
ingestion in humans. The purpose of this review is to determine the
present state of knowledge concerning creatine supplementation, so
that reasonable guidelines may be established and unfounded fears
diminished in regard to its use.
Background

Creatine has become one of the most extensively studied and
scientifically validated nutritional ergogenic aids for athletes.
Additionally, creatine has been evaluated as a potential therapeutic
agent in a variety of medical conditions such as Alzheimer's and
Parkinson's diseases. Biochemically speaking, the energy supplied to
rephosphorylate adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to adenosine triphosphate
(ATP) during and following intense exercise is largely dependent on
the amount of phosphocreatine (PCr) stored in the muscle [6,7]. As PCr
stores become depleted during intense exercise, energy availability
diminishes due to the inability to resynthesize ATP at the rate
required to sustained high-intensity exercise [6,7]. Consequently, the
ability to maintain maximal-effort exercise declines. The availability
of PCr in the muscle may significantly influence the amount of energy
generated during brief periods of high-intensity exercise.
Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that increasing muscle creatine
content, via creatine supplementation, may increase the availability
of PCr allowing for an accelerated rate of resynthesis of ATP during
and following high-intensity, short-duration exercise [6-12].
Theoretically, creatine supplementation during training may lead to
greater training adaptations due to an enhanced quality and volume of
work performed. In terms of potential medical applications, creatine
is intimately involved in a number of metabolic pathways. For this
reason, medical researchers have been investigating the potential
therapeutic role of creatine supplementation in a variety of patient
populations.

Creatine is chemically known as a non-protein nitrogen; a compound
which contains nitrogen but is not a protein per se [13]. It is
synthesized in the liver and pancreas from the amino acids arginine,
glycine, and methionine [9,13,14]. Approximately 95% of the body's
creatine is stored in skeletal muscle. Additionally, small amounts of
creatine are also found in the brain and testes [8,15]. About two
thirds of the creatine found in skeletal muscle is stored as
phosphocreatine (PCr) while the remaining amount of creatine is stored
as free creatine [8]. The total creatine pool (PCr + free creatine) in
skeletal muscle averages about 120 grams for a 70 kg individual.
However, the average human has the capacity to store up to 160 grams
of creatine under certain conditions [7,9]. The body breaks down about
1 – 2% of the creatine pool per day (about 1–2 grams/day) into
creatinine in the skeletal muscle [13]. The creatinine is then
excreted in urine [13,16]. Creatine stores can be replenished by
obtaining creatine in the diet or through endogenous synthesis of
creatine from glycine, arginine, and methionine [17,18]. Dietary
sources of creatine include meats and fish. Large amounts of fish and
meat must be consumed in order to obtain gram quantities of creatine.
Whereas dietary supplementation of creatine provides an inexpensive
and efficient means of increasing dietary availability of creatine
without excessive fat and/or protein intake.
Supplementation Protocols and Effects on Muscle Creatine Stores

Various supplementation protocols have been suggested to be
efficacious in increasing muscle stores of creatine. The amount of
increase in muscle storage depends on the levels of creatine in the
muscle prior to supplementation. Those who have lower muscle creatine
stores, such as those who eat little meat or fish, are more likely to
experience muscle storage increases of 20–40%, whereas those with
relatively high muscle stores may only increase stores by 10–20% [19].
The magnitude of the increase in skeletal muscle creatine content is
important because studies have reported performance changes to be
correlated to this increase [20,21].

The supplementation protocol most often described in the literature is
referred to as the "loading" protocol. This protocol is characterized
by ingesting approximately 0.3 grams/kg/day of CM for 5 – 7 days
(e.g., ≃5 grams taken four times per day) and 3–5 grams/day thereafter
[18,22]. Research has shown a 10–40% increase in muscle creatine and
PCr stores using this protocol [10,22]. Additional research has
reported that the loading protocol may only need to be 2–3 days in
length to be beneficial, particularly if the ingestion coincides with
protein and/or carbohydrate [23,24]. Furthermore, supplementing with
0.25 grams/kg-fat free mass/day of CM may be an alternative dosage
sufficient to increase muscle creatine stores [25].

Other suggested supplementation protocols utilized include those with
no loading phase as well as "cycling" strategies. A few studies have
reported protocols with no loading period to be sufficient for
increasing muscle creatine (3 g/d for 28 days) [15] as well as muscle
size and strength (6 g/d for 12 weeks) [26,27]. These protocols seems
to be equally effective in increasing muscular stores of creatine, but
the increase is more gradual and thus the ergogenic effect does not
occur as quickly. Cycling protocols involve the consumption of
"loading" doses for 3–5 days every 3 to 4 weeks [18,22]. These cycling
protocols appear to be effective in increasing and maintaining muscle
creatine content before a drop to baseline values, which occurs at
about 4–6 weeks [28,29].

Creatine Formulations and Combinations

Many forms of creatine exist in the marketplace, and these choices can
be very confusing for the consumer. Some of these formulations and
combinations include creatine phosphate, creatine +
β-hydroxy- β-methlybut yrate (HMB), creatine + sodium bicarbonate,
creatine magnesium-chelate, creatine + glycerol, creatine + glutamine,
creatine + β-alanine, creatine ethyl ester, creatine with cinnulin
extract, as well as "effervescent" and "serum formulations" . Most of
these forms of creatine have been reported to be no better than
traditional CM in terms of increasing strength or performance [30-38].
Reliable studies are yet to be published for creatine ethyl ester and
creatine with cinnulin extract. Recent studies do suggest, however,
that adding β-alanine to CM may produce greater effects than CM alone.
These investigations indicate that the combination may have greater
effects on strength, lean mass, and body fat percentage; in addition
to delaying neuromuscular fatigue [31,32].

Three alternative creatine formulations have shown promise, but at
present do not have sufficient evidence to warrant recommendation in
lieu of CM. For example, creatine phosphate has been reported to be as
effective as CM at improving LBM and strength, [36] yet this has only
been reported in one study. In addition, creatine phosphate is
currently more difficult and expensive to produce than CM. Combining
CM with sodium phosphate, which has been reported to enhance
high-intensity endurance exercise, may be a more affordable
alternative to creatine phosphate. Secondly, a creatine/HMB
combination was reported to be more effective at improving LBM and
strength than either supplement alone [39], but other data has
reported the combination offers no benefit in terms of increasing
aerobic or anaerobic capacity [40,41]. The conflicting data therefore
do not warrant recommendation of the creatine/HMB combination in lieu
of CM. Lastly, creatine + glycerol has been reported to increase total
body water as a hyper-hydration method prior to exercise in the heat,
but this is also the first study of its kind. In addition, this
combination failed to improve thermal and cardiovascular responses to
a greater extent than CM alone [42].

The addition of nutrients that increase insulin levels and/or improve
insulin sensitivity has been a major source of interest in the last
few years by scientists looking to optimize the ergogenic effects of
creatine. The addition of certain macronutrients appears to
significantly augment muscle retention of creatine. Green et al. [24]
reported that adding 93 g of carbohydrate to 5 g of CM increased total
muscle creatine by 60%. Likewise, Steenge et al. [23] reported that
adding 47 g of carbohydrate and 50 g of protein to CM was as effective
at promoting muscle retention of creatine as adding 96 g of
carbohydrate. Additional investigations by Greenwood and colleagues
[30,43] have reported increased creatine retention from the addition
of dextrose or low levels of D-pinitol (a plant extract with
insulin-like properties). While the addition of these nutrients has
proved to increase muscle retention, several recent investigations
have reported these combinations to be no more effective at improving
muscle strength and endurance or athletic performance [44-46]. Other
recent studies, however, have indicated a potential benefit on
anaerobic power, muscle hypertrophy, and 1 RM muscle strength when
combining protein with creatine [47,48]. It appears that combining CM
with carbohydrate or carbohydrate and protein produces optimal
results. Studies suggest that increasing skeletal muscle creatine
uptake may enhance the benefits of training.
Effects of Supplementation on Exercise Performance and Training
Adaptations

CM appears to be the most effective nutritional supplement currently
available in terms of improving lean body mass and anaerobic capacity.
To date, several hundred peer-reviewed research studies have been
conducted to evaluate the efficacy of CM supplementation in improving
exercise performance. Nearly 70% of these studies have reported a
significant improvement in exercise capacity, while the others have
generally reported non-significant gains in performance [49]. No
studies have reported an ergolytic effect on performance although some
have suggested that weight gain associated with CM supplementation
could be detrimental in sports such as running or swimming. The
average gain in performance from these studies typically ranges
between 10 to 15% depending on the variable of interest. For example,
short-term CM supplementation has been reported to improve maximal
power/strength (5–15%), work performed during sets of maximal effort
muscle contractions (5–15%), single-effort sprint performance (1–5%),
and work performed during repetitive sprint performance (5–15%) [49].
Long-term CM supplementation appears to enhance the overall quality of
training, leading to 5 to 15% greater gains in strength and
performance [49]. Nearly all studies indicate that "proper" CM
supplementation increases body mass by about 1 to 2 kg in the first
week of loading [19].

The vast expanse of literature confirming the effectiveness of CM
supplementation is far beyond the scope of this review. Briefly,
short-term adaptations reported from CM supplementation include
increased cycling power, total work performed on the bench press and
jump squat, as well as improved sport performance in sprinting,
swimming, and soccer [38,50-57]. Long-term adaptations when combining
CM supplementation with training include increased muscle creatine and
PCr content, lean body mass, strength, sprint performance, power, rate
of force development, and muscle diameter [39,54-60]. In long-term
studies, subjects taking CM typically gain about twice as much body
mass and/or fat free mass (i.e., an extra 2 to 4 pounds of muscle mass
during 4 to 12 weeks of training) than subjects taking a placebo
[61-64]. The gains in muscle mass appear to be a result of an improved
ability to perform high-intensity exercise via increased PCr
availability and enhanced ATP synthesis, thereby enabling an athlete
to train harder and promote greater muscular hypertrophy via increased
myosin heavy chain expression possibly due to an increase in myogenic
regulatory factors myogenin and MRF-4 [26,27,65]. The tremendous
numbers of investigations conducted with positive results from CM
supplementation lead us to conclude that it is the most effective
nutritional supplement available today for increasing high-intensity
exercise capacity and building lean mass.
Medical Safety of Creatine Supplementation

While the only clinically significant side effect reported in the
research literature is that of weight gain [4,18,22], many anecdotal
claims of side effects including dehydration, cramping, kidney and
liver damage, musculoskeletal injury, gastrointestinal distress, and
anterior (leg) compartment syndrome still exist in the media and
popular literature. While athletes who are taking CM may experience
these symptoms, the scientific literature suggests that these athletes
have no greater, and a possibly lower, risk of these symptoms than
those not supplementing with CM [2,4,66,67].

Many of these fears have been generated by the media and data taken
from case studies (n = 1). Poortmans and Francaux reported that the
claims of deleterious effects of creatine supplements on renal
function began in 1998 [68]. These claims followed a report that
creatine supplementation was detrimental to renal glomerular
filtration rate (GFR) in a 25-year-old man who had previously
presented with kidney disease (glomerulosclerosis and
corticosteroid- responsive nephritic syndrome) [69]. Three days later,
a French sports newspaper, L'Equipe, reported that supplemental
creatine is dangerous for the kidneys in any condition [70]. Several
European newspapers then picked up the "news" and reported the same.
Since that time, other individual case studies have been published
posing that CM supplementation caused deleterious effects on renal
function [71,72].

Much of the concern about CM supplementation and renal function has
centered around concerns over increased serum creatinine levels. While
creatinine does make up a portion of GFR and must be excreted by the
kidneys, there is no evidence to support the notion that normal
creatine intakes (< 25 g/d) in healthy adults cause renal dysfunction. In fact, Poortmans et al. have shown no detrimental effects of short- (5 days), medium- (14 days), or long-term (10 months to 5 years) CM supplementation on renal function [5,73,74]. Interestingly, Kreider et al. [4] observed no significant difference in creatinine levels between CM users and controls, yet most athletes (regardless of whether taking CM or not) had elevated creatinine levels along with proper clearance during intense training. The authors noted that if serum creatinine was examined as the sole measure of renal function, it would appear that nearly all of the athletes (regardless of CM usage) were experiencing renal distress. Although case studies have reported problems, these large-scale, controlled studies have shown no evidence indicating that CM supplementation in healthy individuals is a detriment to kidney functioning. Another anecdotal complaint about supplemental creatine is that the long-term effects are not known. Widespread use of CM began in the 1990's. Over the last few years a number of researchers have begun to release results of long-term safety trials. So far, no long-term side effects have been observed in athletes (up to 5 years), infants with creatine synthesis deficiency (up to 3 years), or in clinical patient populations (up to 5 years) [4,5,18,75,76] . One cohort of patients taking 1.5 – 3 grams/day of CM has been monitored since 1981 with no significant side effects [77,78]. In addition, research has demonstrated a number of potentially helpful clinical uses of CM in heart patients, infants and patients with creatine synthesis deficiency, patients suffering orthopedic injury, and patients with various neuromuscular diseases. Potential medical uses of supplemental creatine have been investigated since the mid 1970s. Initially, research focused on the role of CM and/or creatine phosphate in reducing heart arrhythmias and/or improving heart function during ischemic events [18]. Interest in medical uses of creatine supplements has expanded to include those with creatine deficiencies [79-81], brain and/or spinal cord injuries [82-86], muscular dystrophy [87-90], diabetes [91], high cholesterol/ triglyceride levels [92], and pulmonary disease [93] among others. Although more research is needed to determine the extent of the clinical utility, some promising results have been reported in a number of studies suggesting that creatine supplements may have therapeutic benefit in certain patient populations. In conjunction with short- and long-term studies in healthy populations, this evidence suggests that creatine supplementation appears to be safe when taken within recommended usage guidelines. Creatine Use in Children and Adolescents Opponents of creatine supplementation have claimed that it is not safe for children and adolescents [1]. While fewer investigations have been conducted in using younger participants, no study has shown CM to have adverse effects in children. In fact, long-term CM supplementation (e.g., 4 – 8 grams/day for up to 3 years) has been used as an adjunctive therapy for a number of creatine synthesis deficiencies and neuromuscular disorders in children. Clinical trials are also being conducted in children with Duschenne muscular dystrophy [87,88]. However, as less is known about the effects of supplemental creatine on children and adolescents, it is the view of the ISSN that younger
athletes should consider a creatine supplement only if the following
conditions are met [19]:


1. The athlete is past puberty and is involved in serious/competitive
training that may benefit from creatine supplementation;

2. The athlete is eating a well-balanced, performance- enhancing diet;

3. The athlete and his/her parents understand the truth concerning the
effects of creatine supplementation;

4. The athlete's parents approve that their child takes supplemental
creatine;

5. Creatine supplementation can be supervised by the athletes parents,
trainers, coaches, and/or physician;

6. Quality supplements are used; and,

7. The athlete does not exceed recommended dosages.

If these conditions are met, then it would seem reasonable that high
school athletes should be able to take a creatine supplement. Doing so
may actually provide a safe nutritional alternative to illegal
anabolic steroids or other potentially harmful drugs.


Conversely, if the above conditions are not met, then creatine supplementation may
not be appropriate. It appears that this is no different than teaching
young athletes' proper training and dietary strategies to optimize
performance. Creatine is not a panacea or short cut to athletic
success.
It can, however, offer some benefits to optimize training of
athletes involved in intense exercise in a similar manner that
ingesting a high-carbohydrate diet, sports drinks, and/or carbohydrate
loading can optimize performance of an endurance athlete.

The Ethics of Creatine

Several athletic governing bodies and special interest groups have
questioned whether it is ethical for athletes to take creatine
supplements as a method of enhancing performance. Since research
indicates that CM can improve performance, and it would be difficult
to ingest enough creatine from food in the diet, they rationalize that
it is unethical to do so. In this age of steroid suspicion in sports,
some argue that if you allow athletes to take creatine, they may be
more predisposed to try other dangerous supplements and/or drugs.
Still others have attempted to directly lump creatine in with anabolic
steroids and/or banned stimulants and have called for a ban on the use
of CM and other supplements among athletes. Finally, fresh off of the
ban of dietary supplements containing ephedra, some have called for a
ban on the sale of CM citing safety concerns. Creatine supplementation
is not currently banned by any athletic organization although the NCAA
does not allow institutions to provide CM or other "muscle building"
supplements to their athletes (e.g., protein, amino acids, HMB, etc).
In this case, athletes must purchase creatine containing supplements
on their own. The International Olympic Committee considered these
arguments and ruled that there was no need to ban creatine supplements
since creatine is readily found in meat and fish and there is no valid
test to determine whether athletes are taking it. In light of the
research that has been conducted with CM, it appears that those who
call for a ban on it are merely familiar with the anecdotal myths
surrounding the supplement, and not the actual facts. We see no
difference between creatine supplementation and ethical methods of
gaining athletic advantage such as using advanced training techniques
and proper nutritional methods. Carbohydrate loading is a nutritional
technique used to enhance performance by enhancing glycogen stores. We
see no difference between such a practice and supplementing with
creatine to enhance skeletal muscle creatine and PCr stores. If
anything, it could be argued that banning the use of creatine would be
unethical as it has been reported to decrease the incidence of
musculoskeletal injuries [2,66,75,94] , heat stress [2,95,96], provide
neuroprotective effects [82,83,85,97, 98], and expedite rehabilitation
from injury [86,99,100].

Conclusion

It is the position of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
that the use of creatine as a nutritional supplement within
established guidelines is safe, effective, and ethical. Despite
lingering myths concerning creatine supplementation in conjunction
with exercise, CM remains one of the most extensively studied, as well
as effective, nutritional aids available to athletes. Hundreds of
studies have shown the effectiveness of CM supplementation in
improving anaerobic capacity, strength, and lean body mass in
conjunction with training. In addition, CM has repeatedly been
reported to be safe, as well as possibly beneficial in preventing
injury. Finally, the future of creatine research looks bright in
regard to the areas of transport mechanisms, improved muscle
retention, as well as treatment of numerous clinical maladies via
supplementation.

References

1. Metzl JD, Small E, Levine SR, Gershel JC :Creatine use among
young athletes. Pediatrics 2001, 108:421-425. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

2. Greenwood M, Kreider RB, Melton C, Rasmussen C, Lancaster S,
Cantler E, Milnor P, Almada A :Creatine supplementation during college
football training does not increase the incidence of cramping or
injury. Mol Cell Biochem 2003, 244:83-88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

3. Kreider RB :Creatine supplementation: analysis of ergogenic
value, medical safety, and concerns. J Exerc Physiol Online 1998., 1:
OpenURL

4. Kreider RB, Melton C, Rasmussen CJ, Greenwood M, Lancaster S,
Cantler EC, Milnor P, Almada AL :Long-term creatine supplementation
does not significantly affect clinical markers of health in athletes.
Mol Cell Biochem 2003, 244:95-104. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

5. Poortmans JR, Francaux M :Long-term oral creatine
supplementation does not impair renal function in healthy athletes.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999, 31:1108-1110. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

6. Chanutin A :The fate of creatine when administered to man.
J Biol Chem 1926, 67:29-34. OpenURL

7. Hultman E, Bergstrom J, Spreit L, Soderlund K :Energy metabolism
and fatigue. In Biochemistry of Exercise VII. Edited by: Taylor A,
Gollnick PD, Green H. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL; 1990:73-92. OpenURL

8. Balsom PD, Soderlund K, Ekblom B :Creatine in humans with
special reference to creatine supplementation. Sports Med 1994,
18:268-80. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

9. Greenhaff P :The nutritional biochemistry of creatine.
J Nutrit Biochem 1997, 11:610-618. Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

10. Greenhaff PL :Muscle creatine loading in humans: Procedures and
functional and metabolic effects. 6th Internationl Conference on
Guanidino Compounds in Biology and Medicine. Cincinatti, OH 2001. OpenURL

11. Greenhaff P, Casey A, Green AL :Creatine supplementation
revisited: An update. Insider 1996, 4:1-2. OpenU

12. Harris RC, Soderlund K, Hultman E :Elevation of creatine in
resting and exercised muscle of normal subjects by creatine
supplementation. Clin Sci (Colch) 1992, 83(3):367-374. OpenURL

13. Brunzel NA :Renal function: Nonprotein nitrogen compounds,
function tests, and renal disease. In Clinical Chemistry. Edited by:
Scardiglia J, Brown M, McCullough K, Davis K. McGraw-Hill: New York,
NY; 2003:373-399. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

14. Paddon-Jones D, Borsheim E, Wolfe RR :Potential ergogenic
effects of arginine and creatine supplementation. J Nutr 2004,
134:2888S-2894S. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

15. Hultman E, Soderlund K, Timmons JA, Cederblad G, Greenhaff PL
:Muscle creatine loading in men. J Appl Physiol 1996, 81:232-237.
PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

16. Burke DG, Smith-Palmer T, Holt LE, Head B, Chilibeck PD :The
effect of 7 days of creatine supplementation on 24-hour urinary
creatine excretion. J Strength Cond Res 2001, 15:59-62. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

17. Williams MH, Branch JD :Creatine supplementation and exercise
performance: an update. J Am Coll Nutr 1998, 17:216-34. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

18. Williams MH, Kreider R, Branch JD :Creatine: The power
supplement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1999:252. OpenURL

19. Kreider RB :Creatine in Sports. In Essentials of Sport Nutrition
& Supplements. Edited by: Antonio J, Kalman D, Stout J, et al. Humana
Press Inc., Totowa, NJ; 2007:in press. OpenURL

20. Greenhaff PL, Casey A, Short AH, Harris R, Soderlund K, Hultman
E :Influence of oral creatine supplementation of muscle torque during
repeated bouts of maximal voluntary exercise in man. Clin Sci (Colch)
1993, 84(5):565-571. OpenURL

21. Greenhaff PL, Bodin K, Soderlund K, Hultman E :Effect of oral
creatine supplementation on skeletal muscle phosphocreatine
resynthesis. Am J Physiol 1994, 266:E725-30. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

22. Kreider RB, Leutholtz BC, Greenwood M :Creatine. In Nutritional
Ergogenic Aids. Edited by: Wolinsky I, Driskel J. CRC Press LLC: Boca
Raton, FL; 2004:81-104. OpenURL

23. Steenge GR, Simpson EJ, Greenhaff PL :Protein- and
carbohydrate- induced augmentation of whole body creatine retention in
humans. J Appl Physiol 2000, 89:1165-71. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

24. Green AL, Hultman E, Macdonald IA, Sewell DA, Greenhaff PL
:Carbohydrate ingestion augments skeletal muscle creatine accumulation
during creatine supplementation in humans. Am J Physiol 1996,
271:E821-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

25. Burke DG, Chilibeck PD, Parise G, Candow DG, Mahoney D,
Tarnopolsky M :Effect of creatine and weight training on muscle
creatine and performance in vegetarians. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003,
35:1946-55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

26. Willoughby DS, Rosene J :Effects of oral creatine and resistance
training on myosin heavy chain expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001,
33:1674-81. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

27. Willoughby DS, Rosene JM :Effects of oral creatine and
resistance training on myogenic regulatory factor expression.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003, 35:923-929. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

28. Vandenberghe K, Goris M, Van Hecke P, Van Leemputte M, Vangerven
L, Hespel P :Long-term creatine intake is beneficial to muscle
performance during resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1997,
83:2055-63. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

29. Candow DG, Chilibeck PD, Chad KE, Chrusch MJ, Davison KS, Burke
DG :Effect of ceasing creatine supplementation while maintaining
resistance training in older men. J Aging Phys Act 2004, 12:219-31.
PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

30. Greenwood M, Kreider R, Earnest C, Rassmussen C, Almada A
:Differences in creatine retention among three nutritional
formulations of oral creatine supplements. J Exerc Physiol Online
2003, 6:37-43. OpenURL

31. Stout JR, Cramer JT, Mielke M, O'Kroy J, Torok DJ, Zoeller RF
:Effects of twenty-eight days of beta-alanine and creatine monohydrate
supplementation on the physical working capacity at neuromuscular
fatigue threshold. J Strength Cond Res 2006, 20:938-931. Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

32. Hoffman J, Ramatess N, Kang J, Mangine G, Faigenbaum A, Stout J
:Effect of creatine and beta-alanine supplementation on performance
and endocrine responses in strength/power athletes. Int J Sport Nutr
Exerc Metab 2006, 16:430-446. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

33. Falk DJ, Heelan KA, Thyfault JP, Koch AJ :Effects of
effervescent creatine, ribose, and glutamine supplementation on
muscular strength, muscular endurance, and body composition. J
Strength Cond Res 2003, 17:810-816. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

34. Kreider RB, Willoughby D, Greenwood M, Parise G, Payne E,
Tarnopolsky M :Effects of serum creatine supplementation on muscle
creatine and phosphagen levels. J Exerc Physio Online 2003, 6:24-33.
OpenURL

35. Selsby JT, DiSilvestro RA, Devor ST :Mg2+-creatine chelate and a
low-dose creatine supplementation regimen improve exercise
performance. J Strength Cond Res 2004, 18:311-315. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

36. Peeters BM, Lantz CD, Mayhew JL :Effect of oral creatine
monohydrate and creatine phosphate supplementation on maximal strength
indices, body composition, and blood pressure. J Strength Cond Res
1999, 13:3-9. Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

37. Lehmkuhl M, Malone M, Justice B, Trone G, Pistilli E, Vinci D,
Haff EE, Kilgore JL, Haff GG :The effects of 8 weeks of creatine
monohydrate and glutamine supplementation on body composition and
performance measures. J Strength Cond Res 2003, 17:425-438. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

38. Mero AA, Keskinen KL, Malvela MT, Sallinen JM :Combined creatine
and sodium bicarbonate supplementation enhances interval swimming. J
Strength Cond Res 2004, 18:306-310. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

39. Jowko E, Ostaszewski P, Jank M, Sacharuk J, Zieniewicz A,
Wilczak J, Nissen S :Creatine and B-hydroxy-B- methylbutyrate (HMB)
additively increase lean body mass and muscle strength during a
weight-training program. Nutrition 2001, 17:558-566. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

40. O'Conner DM, Crowe MJ :Effects of β-hydroxy- β-methylbut yrate and
creatine monohydrate supplementation on the aerobic and anaerobic
capacity of highly trained athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003,
43:64-68. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

41. O'Conner DM, Crowe MJ :Effects of six weeks of
beta-hydroxy- beta-methylbutyr ate (HMB) and HMB/creatine
supplementation on strength, power, and anthropometry of highly
trained athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2007, 21:419-423. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

42. Easton C, Turner S, Pitsaladis YP :Creatine and glycerol
hyperhydration in trained subjects before exercise in the heat. Int J
Sports Nut Exerc Metab 2007, 17:70-91. OpenURL

43. Greenwood M, Kreider RB, Rasmussen C, Almada AL, Earnest CP
:D-pinitol augments whole body creatine retention in man. J Exerc
Physiol Online 2001, 4:41-47. OpenURL

44. Chromiak JA, Smedley B, Carpenter W, Brown R, Koh YS, Lamberth
JG, Joe LA, Abadie BR, Altorfer G :Effect of a 10-week strength
training program and recovery drink on body composition, muscular
strength and endurance, and anaerobic power and capacity.
Nutrition 2004, 20:420-427. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text |
OpenURL

45. Carter JM, Bemben DA, Knehans AW, Bemben MG, Witten MS :Does
nutritional supplementation influence adaptability of muscle to
resistance training in men aged 48 to 72 years? J Geriatric Phys
Therapy 2005, 28(2):40-47. OpenURL

46 Theodorou AS, Havenetidis K, Zanker CL, O'Hara JP, King RF, Hood
C, Paradisis G, Cooke CB :Effects of acute creatine loading with or
without CHO on repeated bouts of maximal swimming in high-performance
swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 2005, 19:265-269. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

47. Beck TW, Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Coburn DW, Malek MH, Cramer JT
:Effects of a drink containing creatine, amino acids, and protein,
combined with ten weeks of resistance training on body composition,
strength, and anaerobic performance. J Strength Cond Res 2007,
21:100-104. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

48. Cribb PJ, Williams AD, Stathis CG, Carey MF, Hayes A :Effects of
Whey Isolate, Creatine, and Resistance Training on Muscle Hypertrophy.
Med Sci Sports Exer 2007, 39:298-307. Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

49. Kreider RB :Effects of creatine supplementation on performance
and training adaptations. Mol Cell Biochem 2003, 244:89-94. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

50. Volek JS, Kraemer WJ, Bush JA, Boetes M, Incledon T, Clark KL,
Lynch JM :Creatine supplementation enhances muscular performance
during high-intensity resistance exercise. J Am Diet Assoc 1997,
97:765-70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

51. Tarnopolsky MA, MacLennan DP :Creatine monohydrate
supplementation enhances high-intensity exercise performance in males
and females. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2000, 10:452-63. PubMed
Abstract | OpenURL

52. Wiroth JB, Bermon S, Andrei S, Dalloz E, Heberturne X, Dolisi C
:Effects of oral creatine supplementation on maximal pedalling
performance in older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001, 84:533-9. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

53. Skare OC, Skadberg , Wisnes AR :Creatine supplementation
improves sprint performance in male sprinters. Scand J Med Sci Sports
2001, 11:96-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

54. Mujika I, Padilla S, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M, Gorostiaga E
:Creatine supplementation and sprint performance in soccer players.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000, 32:518-25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

55. Ostojic SM :Creatine supplementation in young soccer players.
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2004, 14:95-103. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

56. Theodorou AS, Cooke CB, King RF, Hood C, Denison T, Wainwright
BG, Havenitidis K :The effect of longer-term creatine supplementation
on elite swimming performance after an acute creatine loading. J
Sports Sci 1999, 17:853-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

57. Preen D, Dawson B, Goodman C, Lawrence S, Beilby J, Ching S
:Effect of creatine loading on long-term sprint exercise performance
and metabolism. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:814-21. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

58. Vandenberghe K, Goris M, Van Hecke P, Van Leemputte M, Vangerven
L, Hespel P :Long-term creatine intake is beneficial to muscle
performance during resistance training. J Appl Physiol 1997,
83:2055-63. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

59. Kreider RB, Ferreira M, Wilson M, Grindstaff P, Plisk S,
Reinardy J, Cantler E, Almada AL :Effects of creatine supplementation
on body composition, strength, and sprint performance. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 1998, 30:73-82. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

60. Volek JS, Duncan ND, Mazzetti SA, Staron RS, Putukian M, Gomez
AL, Pearson DR, Fink WJ, Kraemer WJ :Performance and muscle fiber
adaptations to creatine supplementation and heavy resistance training.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999, 31:1147-56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher
Full Text | OpenURL

61. Stone MH, Sanborn K, Smith LL, O'Bryant HS, Hoke T, Utter AC,
Johnson RL, Boros R, Hruby J, Pierce KC, Stone ME, Garner B :Effects
of in-season (5 weeks) creatine and pyruvate supplementation on
anaerobic performance and body composition in American football
players. Int J Sport Nutr 1999, 9:146-65. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

62. Noonan D, Berg K, Latin RW, Wagner JC, Reimers K :Effects of
varying dosages of oral creatine relative to fat free body mass on
strength and body composition. J Strength Cond Res 1998, 12:104-108.
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

63. Kirksey KB, Stone MH, Warren BJ, Johnson RL, Stone M, Haff GG,
Williams FE, Proulx C :The effects of 6 weeks of creatine monohydrate
supplementation on performance measures and body composition in
collegiate track and field athletes. J Strength Cond Res 1999,
13:148-156. Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

64. Jones AM, Atter T, Georg KP :Oral creatine supplementation
improves multiple sprint performance in elite ice-hockey players. J
Sports Med Phys Fitness 1999, 39:189-96. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

65. Kreider RB, Almada AL, Antonio J, Broeder C, Earnest C,
Greenwood M, Incledon T, Kalman DS, Kleiner SM, Leutholtz B, Lowery
LM, Mendel R, Stout JR, Willoughby DS, Ziegenfuss TN :ISSN exercise &
sport nutrition review: research and recommendations. Sport Nutr Rev J
2004, 1:1-44. OpenURL

66. Greenwood M, Kreider RB, Greenwood L, Byars A :Cramping and
injury incidence in collegiate football players are reduced by
creatine supplementation. J Athl Train 2003, 38:216-219. PubMed
Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text | OpenURL

67. Greenwood M, Kreider RB, Greenwood L, Byars A :The effects of
creatine supplementation on cramping and injury occurrence during
college baseball training and competition. J Exerc Physiol Online
2003, 6:16-23. OpenURL

68. Poortmans JR, Francaux M :Adverse effects of creatine
supplementation: fact or fiction? Sports Med 2000, 30:155-170. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

69. Pritchard NR, Kalra PA :Renal dysfunction accompanying oral
creatine supplements. Lancet 1998, 351:1252-1253. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

70. La creatine dangereuse? L'Equipe10. Open URL 1998, April 10

71. Koshy KM, Giswold E, Scheenberger EE :Interstitial nephritis in
a patient taking creatine. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:814-5. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

72. Thorsteinsdottir B, Grande JP, Garovic VD :Acute renal failure
in a young weight lifter taking multiple food supplements including
creatine monohydrate. J Renal Nutr 2006, 16(4):341-345. OpenURL

73. Poortmans JR, Auquier H, Renaut V, Durussel A, Saugy M, Brisson
GR :Effect of short-term creatine supplementation on renal responses
in men. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997, 76:566-567. Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

74. Poortmans JR, Kumps A, Duez P, Fofonka A, Carpentier A, Francaux
M :Effect of oral creatine supplementation on urinary methylamine,
formaldehyde, and formate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005, 37:1717-1720.
PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

75. Schilling BK, Stone MH, Utter A, Kearney JT, Johnson M,
Coglianese R, Smith L, O'Bryant HS, Fry AC, Starks M, Keith R, Stone
ME :Creatine supplementation and health variables: a retrospective
study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:183-188. PubMed Abstract |
Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

76. Robinson TM, Sewell DA, Casey A, Steenge G, Greenhaff PL
:Dietary creatine supplementation does not affect some haematological
indices, or indices of muscle damage and hepatic and renal function.
Br J Sports Med 2000, 34:284-8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
| OpenURL

77. Sipila I, Rapola J, Simell O, Vannas A :Supplementary creatine
as a treatment for gyrate atrophy of the choroid and retina. New Engl
J Med 1981, 304:867-870. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

78. Vannas-Sulonen K, Sipila I, Vannas A, Simell O, Rapola J :Gyrate
atrophy of the choroid and retina. A five-year follow-up of creatine
supplementation. Ophthalmology 1985, 92:1719-27. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

79. Ensenauer R, Thiel T, Schwab KO, Tacke U, Stockler-Ipsiroglu S,
Schulze A, Hennig J, Lehnert W :Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase
deficiency: differences of creatine uptake in human brain and muscle.
Mol Genet Metab 2004, 82:208-13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
| OpenURL

80. Schulze A, Ebinger F, Rating D, Mayatepek E :Improving treatment
of guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: reduction of
guanidinoacetic acid in body fluids by arginine restriction and
ornithine supplementation. Mol Genet Metab 2001, 74:413-419. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

81. Ganesan V, Johnson A, Connelly A, Eckhardt S, Surtees RA
:Guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: new clinical features.
Pediatr Neurol 1997, 17:155-157. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

82. Zhu S, Li M, Figueroa BE, Liu A, Stavrovskaya IG, Pasinelli P,
Beal MF, Brown RH Jr, Kristal BS, Ferrante RJ, Friedlander RM
:Prophylactic creatine administration mediates neuroprotection in
cerebral ischemia in mice. J Neurosci 2004, 24:5909-12. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

83. Hausmann ON, Fouad K, Wallimann T, Schwab ME :Protective effects
of oral creatine supplementation on spinal cord injury in rats. Spinal
Cord 2002, 40:449-56. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

84. Brustovetsky N, Brustovetsky T, Dubinsky JM :On the mechanisms
of neuroprotection by creatine and phosphocreatine. J Neurochem 2001,
76:425-34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

85. Sullivan PG, Geiger JD, Mattson MP, Scheff SW :Dietary
supplement creatine protects against traumatic brain injury. Ann
Neurol 2000, 48:723-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

86. Jacobs PL, Mahoney ET, Cohn KA, Sheradsky LF, Green BA :Oral
creatine supplementation enhances upper extremity work capacity in
persons with cervical-level spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
2002, 83:19-23. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

87. Felber S, Skladal D, Wyss M, Kremser C, Koller A, Sperl W :Oral
creatine supplementation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a clinical
and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neurol Res 2000,
22:145-50. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

88. Tarnopolsky MA, Mahoney DJ, Vajsar J, Rodriguez C, Doherty TJ,
Roy BD, Biggar D :Creatine monohydrate enhances strength and body
composition in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology 2004,
62:1771-1777. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

89. Pearlman JP, Fielding RA :Creatine Monohydrate as a therapeutic
aid in muscular dystrophy. Nutr Reviews 2006, 64:80-88. Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

90. Matsumura T :A clinical trial of creatine monohydrate in
muscular dystrophy patients. Clin Neurol (Japan) 2004, 44(10):661-666.
OpenURL

91. Op't Eijnde B, Urso B, Richter EA, Greenhaff PL, Hespel P
:Effect of oral creatine supplementation on human muscle GLUT4 protein
content after immobilization. Diabetes 2001, 50:18-23. PubMed Abstract
| Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

92. Earnest CP, Almada A, Mitchell TL :High-performance capillary
electrophoresis- pure creatine monohydrate reduced blood lipids in men
and women. Clinical Science 1996, 91:113-118. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

93. Fuld JP, Kilduff LP, Neder JA, Pitsiladis Y, Lean MEJ, Ward SA,
Cotton MM :Creatine supplementation during pulmonary rehabilitation in
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2005, 60:531-7. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

94. Tyler TF, Nicholas SJ, Hershman EB, Glace BW, Mullaney MJ,
McHugh MP :The effect of creatine supplementation on strength recovery
after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a randomized,
placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Am J Sports Med 2004,
32:383-8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

95. Kilduff LP, Georgiades E, James N, Minnion RH, Mitchell M,
Kingsmore D, Hadjicharlambous M, Pitsiladis YP :The effects of
creatine supplementation on cardiovascular, metabolic, and
thermoregulatory responses during exercise in the heat in
endurance-trained humans. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2004,
14:443-60. PubMed Abstract | OpenURL

96. Volek JS, Mazzetti SA, Farquhar WB, Barnes BR, Gomez AL, Kraemer
WJ :Physiological responses to short-term exercise in the heat after
creatine loading. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:1101-8. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

97. Wyss M, Schulze A :Health implications of creatine: can oral
creatine supplementation protect against neurological and
atherosclerotic disease? Neuroscience 2002, 112:243-60. PubMed
Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

98. Ferrante RJ, Andreassen OA, Jenkins BG, Dedeoglu A, Kuemmerle S,
Kubilus JK, Kaddurah-Daouk R, Hersch SM, Beal MF :Neuroprotective
effects of creatine in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington's
disease. J Neurosci 2000, 20:4389-97. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full
Text | OpenURL

99. Tarnopolsky MA :Potential benefits of creatine monohydrate
supplementation in the elderly. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2000,
3:497-502. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

100. Hespel P, Op't Eijnde B, Van Leemputte M, Urso B, Greenhaff PL,
Labarque V, Dymarkowski S, Van Hecke P, Richter EA :Oral creatine
supplementation facilitates the rehabilitation of disuse atrophy and
alters the expression of muscle myogenic factors in humans. J Physiol
2001, 536:625-33. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | OpenURL

Giants Top Minor League Prospects

  • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
  • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
  • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
  • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
  • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
  • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
  • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
  • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
  • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
  • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
  • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
  • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
  • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
  • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

  • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
  • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
  • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
  • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
  • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

  • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
  • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
  • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
  • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
  • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.