Friday, May 29, 2015

Posey perfects the art of framing with the walk-off, 3rd strike frame

buster
http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/2015/5/28/8685049/sf-giants-recap-scoreless-streak

There is no better Buster than cocky Buster. 


This was the highlight of the game, other than the good Chris Heston showing up to out-duel the Braves starter Shelby Miller.  Buster leaves the stage entirely to the umpire to display his punch-out mechanic. Our work is done boys. Let's hit!! 

Jake Peavy's rehab assignment didn't go too well last night. If he can't get minor-leaguers out, how does he take this kid's spot?

With Heston and Vogie clicking and Timmy starting to pick up the pace, I've hardly noticed Peavy and Cain not being around. Short of "Brandon Crawford's magical glove", Chris Heston is the runner-up answer in the "Where would the Giants be without.....?" contest. 


Bummmer, Timmy, Timmy, Vogie and Heston - Not bad. A little tilted to the right-side, but not bad. When they keep it in the park, these guys can keep opponents down. 

10 bizarre baseball rules you won't believe actually existed



from mlb.com

http://m.mlb.com/cutfour/2015/05/22/124363454/
 1. Batters had the right to request a low or high pitch from 1867 to 1887

Imagine Mike Trout walking up to the plate and telling David Price exactly where he wanted the ball. In the game's infancy, that was a reality: Prior to every at-bat, batters would request a high or low strike zone -- either from the knee to the belt or the belt to the shoulder -- and the pitcher had to put it there. Awfully demanding of you, late-19th-century batsmen.
2. Fly balls could be caught off a bounce until 1864, and foul balls until 1883
This may seem bizarre to baseball fans today, but the logic behind the one-bounce rule was actually fairly straightforward: It was a holdover from other favorite childhood games, like jacks, and in the days before gloves it allowed players to avoid catching a very hard ball with their bare hands.
As the 19th century wore on, though, support for the rule waned. After years of hilariously acrimonious debate -- at a convention in New York, one delegate even dubbed it a "boy's rule" -- the rule was officially voted out for fair balls in 1864. Foul balls, however, could still be caught on a bounce for another 20 years. 
3. Pitchers were required to throw underhand until 1883
Baseball owed much of its origin to cricket, and one of the game's first codified sets of rules -- the Knickerbocker rules, drafted in 1845 for New York's Knickerbocker baseball club --speak to those roots: "The ball must be pitched, not thrown, for the bat." "Pitched", in the traditional sense of the term: a stiff, underhanded motion, almost like bowling.
The first man to go electric, according to MLB's official historian John Thorn, was Tommy Bond: He raised his delivery just above the waist in the mid-1870s, and from there, it was only a matter of time before the overhand delivery was born, if only because this is not the face of a man you want to mess with:
Tommy Bond
But at least the Chad Bradfords of the world can rest a little bit easier tonight, knowing that, once upon a time, they were the normal ones.
4. One side of the bat was allowed to be flat from 1885 to 1893
Concerned about a lack of scoring in the National League (league-wide ERA: 2.37, so quit bragging, Kershaw), Cincinnati Red Stockings organizer Harry Wright proposed a rule change to help juice offense: Allow bats to have a flat face, much like cricket. After much hand-wringing, the NL adopted the policy in 1885, and, combined with changes to the pitching distance, runs began to increase -- until everyone soon realized that flat bats had a tendency to splinter, and the rule was rescinded in 1893.
5. Walks were scored as hits for one year, in 1887
If you read the above and thought, "Wow, that seems destined to cause all kind of record-keeping difficulties," well, you would be absolutely correct!
A staggering 11 players hit .400 that season, nine of whom wouldn't have had walks not counted as an at-bat. The statistics were even rewritten in 1968 by the Special Baseball Records Committee, with drastic consequences: Cap Anson, who hit .421 to lead the league in 1887, had 60 hits taken away, which stripped him of not only the batting title but the honor of first-ever member of the 3,000-hit club. In 2001, MLB reversed the Committee's decision, and Cap now sits proudly in the Hall of Fame with over 3,400 hits and one stellar mustache:
Cap Anson
As for the rule itself, it was deeply unpopular even at the time -- with a New York Times article even referring to walks as "phantom hits" -- and it was quickly rectified after one year.
6. Umpires in the 19th century had it made
The plight of the umpire is a difficult one: You try tracking a small white ball traveling at ridiculously high speeds, with a stadium full of people and the entire Internet ready to castigate you if you're wrong.
Being an umpire at the turn of the 20th century, though? Thatactually sounds pretty great: They were chosen from the crowd prior to first pitch -- they were often prominent members of the local community -- and rather than spend all that energy to squat behind the catcher, umpires were given easy chairs in the general vicinity of home plate. And that was just the beginning of the perks. From Ohio's Marion Star newspaper in 1916:
"The old time umpires were accorded the utmost courtesy by the players. They were given easy chairs, placed near the home plate, provided with fans on hot days and their absolute comfort was uppermost in the minds of the players. The umpire always received the choicest bits of food and the largest glass of beer."
Sign us up, please.
7. Rather than crouching, catchers would stand a few feet behind home until the early 1900s
Nowadays, catchers serve a vital defensive purpose -- from calling a game to the art of framing pitches to throwing out baserunners. In the mid-1800s, though, their responsibilities were far simpler: Just get in the way of the ball, please. Catchers were originally conceived as glorified backstops, standing a few feet behind home plate and making sure balls didn't roll past them. A couple of innovative souls began to buck this trend in the 1870s, but the crouching we're accustomed to wouldn't truly spread until the beginning of the 20th century.
8. The spitball was outlawed in 1920 -- but pitchers who had been throwing it for years were grandfathered in
Pitchers doctoring baseballs was always an ethical gray area, but it was a fairly common practice in the early days, and spit wasn't nearly the worst of it: pitchers would use mud, grease, soap, anything they could think of to make the ball dance in unpredictable ways.
Wanting to bring more offense to the game, MLB responded in 1920, outlawing the practice for good. But several famous spitballers were in the middle of their careers, and so the league came up with a compromise: a grandfather clause, allowing those who had thrown it before the rule to continue to do so. Righty Burleigh Grimes carried the "last official spitballer" mantlefor 14 more years, grossing out all of his teammates until his retirement in 1934:
Burleigh Grimes
9. It was pretty difficult to hit a walk-off homer until 1920
The batter steps to the plate in the bottom of the ninth, bases loaded, the score tied. He swings, and blasts one over the 400-foot sign in left field! The crowd roars as our hero celebrates his walkoff ... single, at least for the game's first few decades. Until 1920, hitters were only given credit for the number of bases the winning run advanced -- so, for example, a walkoff home run that scored a runner from second would only be considered a double, because that runner only advanced two bases. The only way a home run could stand as a walk-off was if the batter himself was the winning run.
Setting aside the impact this rule had on the record books, just think of the home plate celebrations baseball's earliest fans were deprived of.
10. Ground rule doubles were actually home runs as recently as 1930
Yes, really: Any ball that bounced off the ground and over the fence was ruled a home run. Rumor has it that at least one of Lou Gehrig's home runs during his 1927 home run race with Babe Ruth was actually a ground rule double.
In fact, at one point the very concept of a home run was an alien one: According to Thorn, on May 21, 1880 -- a time when few parks had ground rules stipulating that a ball clearing the wall was a home run -- a player hit a ball over the fence and into a river, and the right fielder, confused as to what to do next, actually hopped into a boat to go retrieve the thing. (He eventually gave up, unsuccessful in his pursuit. Stay forever weird, baseball.)






Strange but True Rules from MLB rule book


Tough being in umpire nowadays.

I had the uncaught third strike almost come back to bite me in the butt when I was working with a partner who was apparently not aware that a third strike had to be caught on the fly. He came flying down the line from 1B and stopped the batter-runner from trying to reach first after the catcher didn't properly catch strike three.

Luckily for us, the coach was unaware that we were wrong or just erroneously assumed we were right rather than conflicted and confused as we seemed by both having different opinions. It's gotta be tougher on the big stage where stuff happens faster and under more stress and scrutiny.  However, umpires on the lower levels have the added burden of dealing with different rules books and interpretations depending on the level and the governing body administering the rules.

10 strange-but-true rules from MLB's official rulebook
10. Runners advance one base if a pitched ball "lodges in the umpire's or catcher's mask or paraphernalia." Rule 5.09(g)
9. A designated hitter is specifically prohibited from sitting in the bullpen, unless serving as a bullpen catcher. Rule 6.10(b)(15)
8. A runner is out when they are hit by a fair batted ball, whether they are on a base or not, except when the infield fly rule is called. In that case they are not out if hit by the ball while on base, but are still out if hit by the ball off a base. Rule 7.08(f)
7. When a manager, coach or player are ejected, they are expressly permitted to take a seat in the stands, as long as they change into street clothes and are "well removed from the vincinity of his team's bench or bullpen." Rule 4.07
6. If a fielder deflects a fair ball into the stands, it counts as a home run; unless the deflection somehow manages to occur 250 feet or closer to home plate, in which case all runners only advance two bases. Rule 6.09(h)
5. If a player pinch-hits for a batter in the middle of an at-bat with two strikes, and strikes out, the at-bat and strikeout are credited to the replaced batter. Any other outcome is credited to the pinch-hitter.  Rule 10.15(b)
4. The umpire has the specific authority to, in the case of wet weather, instruct the pitcher to put the rosin bag in his pocket. Rule 8.02(a)
3. All runners, including the batter, advance three bases if a fielder intentionally touches a fair batted ball with their cap, mask or any other part of their uniform "detached from the proper place on his person." All runners advance two bases if the same thing happens on a thrown ball.Rule 7.05(b-e)
2. If there are two strikes on the batter, and a runner steals home, and the pitch hits the runner in the strike zone, the batter is out. The run does not score if there are two outs; if there are less than two outs, it does. Rule 6.05(n)
1. Pitchers are allowed to switch their throwing arm in the middle of an at-bat, but only if they have injured the other one. If one does, they do not get an opportunity to warm up with the other arm. Rule 8.01(f)
-- Dan Wohl / MLB.com

--

from wikipedia.com
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncaught_third_strike

In baseball and softball, an uncaught third strike (sometimes referred to as dropped third strike) occurs when the catcherfails to cleanly catch a pitch for the third strike. A pitch is considered uncaught if the ball touches the ground before being caught (a bouncing ball), or if the ball is dropped after being grasped (see also catch). In Major League Baseball, the specific rules concerning the uncaught third strike are addressed in Rules 6.05 and 6.09 of the Official Baseball Rules.[1]

On an uncaught third strike with no runner on first base or with two outs, the batter immediately becomes a runner. The strike is called, but the umpire does not call the batter out. The umpire may also actively signal that there is "no catch" of the pitch. The batter may then attempt to reach first base and must be tagged or forced out. With two outs and the bases loaded, the catcher who fails to catch the third strike may, upon picking up the ball, step on home plate for a force-out or make a throw to any other fielder.

The purpose of the "no runner on first base or two outs" qualification is to prevent the catcher from deliberately dropping a third strike pitch and then initiating an unfair double or triple play with possible force plays at second base, third base, or home plate, in addition to putting the batter out at first base. The logic of the situation is similar to that which led to the infield fly rule.

Regardless of the outcome of an uncaught third strike, the pitcher is statistically credited with a strikeout. Because of the uncaught third strike rule, it is possible for a pitcher to register more than three strikeouts in an inning.

In Little League, in the Tee-Ball and Minor League divisions, the batter is out after the third strike regardless of whether the pitched ball is caught cleanly by the catcher. In Little League (or the Major Division), Junior, Senior, and Big League divisions, a batter may attempt to advance to first base on an uncaught third strike. Little League Major Division Softball and many other youth baseball leagues (such as the USSSA) also follow the rule.



Thursday, May 28, 2015

MLB could alter strike zone as response to declining offense - Yahoo Sports


The Royals' Nori Aoki swings through a low pitch. (AP)
The Royals' Nori Aoki swings through a low pitch. (AP)

At long last, a tacit acknowledgement that the introduction of Questec and the subsequent narrowing and distorting of  the strike-zone as it was back then, was one of the leading factors to the performance enhancement of offensive numbers in the early 2000's ( a pet theory of mine ).

They finally acknowledge the concept of "unintended consequences". You can't make that kind of fundamental change to the way the game is played on a pitch to pitch basis and not expect serious ramifications. And they got 'em. Oh yes they did.


  • There was a reason Curt Schilling took a bat to one of the early versions of Questec in the D-Backs dugout.
  • There was a reason that Bonds broke McGwire's HR record the first year of Questec's implementation.


  • The handwriting was on the wall. "The times they are a-changin'." (click for musical interlude)

    In the social sciencesunintended consequences (sometimes unanticipated consequences or unforeseen consequences) are outcomes that are not the ones foreseen and intended by a purposeful action. The term was popularised in the twentieth century by American sociologist Robert K. Merton.[1]

    Unintended consequences can be grouped into three types:
    • Unexpected benefit: A positive, unexpected benefit (also referred to as luckserendipity or a windfall).
    • Unexpected drawback: A negative, unexpected detriment occurring in addition to the desired effect of the policy (e.g., while irrigationschemes provide people with water for agriculture, they can increase waterborne diseases that have devastating health effects, such as schistosomiasis).
    • Perverse result: A perverse effect contrary to what was originally intended (when an intended solution makes a problem worse). This is sometimes referred to as 'backfire'.


    Concern around baseball about the strike zone filtered down to the MLB's Playing Rules Committee, which must formally adopt a rules change before it's implemented. The committee will pay close attention to the size of the strike zone in 2015 with an eye on change as early as 2016 after studies showed it has expanded significantly since 2009, coinciding with a precipitous dip in run scoring. Of particular concern, sources said, is the low strike, a scourge not only because it has stretched beyond the zone's boundaries but is considered a significantly more difficult pitch to hit.
    Runs per game fell to 4.07 in 2014, the lowest mark since 1981 and the 13th fewest since World War II, and studies from The Hardball Times' Jon Roegele and Florida professor Brian Mills pegged the low strike as a significant culprit.
    Since 2009, the average size of the called strike zone has jumped from 435 square inches to 475 square inches, according to Roegele's research. The results: Pitchers are throwing more in the lower part of the zone, and hitters are swinging at an increased rate, knowing the tough-to-drive pitches will be called strikes.
    Roegele's study estimated 31 percent of the offensive drought could be attributed to the strike zone while Mills estimated it's between 24 percent and 41 percent. After seeing a strong correlation among the size of the strike zone, all-time-high strikeout rates and historically low walk rates, members of the committee now are fairly certain the relationship is causative, too, and seem primed to do something about it.
    The problem, sources said, stems from technological leaps that caused unintended consequences. In 1996, when the league last changed the strike zone to extend it from the top of the knees to the bottom, beneath the hollow of the kneecap, it did so to encourage umpires to call knee-level strikes. The lower end of the zone, in practice, was about three-quarters of the way down the thigh, so the idea was that by adjusting the eye levels of umpires to look lower, the result would be a more traditional strike zone.
    Then along came Questec, the computerized pitch-tracking system, followed by Zone Evaluation, the current version tied in to MLB's PITCHf/x system. With a tremendous degree of accuracy – especially in recent years – the systems tracked textbook balls and strikes, and the home-plate umpires' performances were graded on a nightly basis. Over time, not only did umpires' strike zones move down to the knees, they went to the hollow and even a smidge below.
    "I don't think the Playing Rules Committee at the time of the last change ever expected that the umpires would call strikes at the hollow of the knee," said Mets general manager Sandy Alderson, the current chairman of the committee. "To their credit, the umpires now are."

    I remember being rather active on one of the message forums of one of the pitching gurus of the day back in the late 1990's - early 2000's (it was SETPRO, Paul Nyman's excellent site) and one of the hitting guys blurbed out that it seemed as if Barry Bonds was having trouble adjusting to the new and improved strike-zone that QUESTEC had wrought. My jaw dropped when I read it because the guy was extremely knowledgeable about hitting mechanics, in my opinion, but I wrote back that the new zone was made to order for Barry and that once the weather heated up and he warmed up there would be no way for pitchers to pitch to him anymore. That proved to be the case, because after a slow April of that year (2001) he went on a torrid pace that culminated in the new HR record and pitchers found a way to pitch around Barry by intentionally walking him at a record pace from then on out.

    from baseball-almanac.com
    http://www.baseball-almanac.com/players/hittinglogs.php?p=bondsba01&y=2001

    Barry Bonds 2001 Game by Game Batting Logs

    Barry Bonds appeared in 153 Major League games during the 2001 regular season. The chart below is a comprehensive analysis of the games Bonds appeared in, specifically relating to his 2001 hitting statistics. Notes: The Date / Box field has a link to the box score from the game being described. If the Date is followed by an asterisk (*), Bonds started during that game at the first position listed in the Position(s) column. Cumulative monthly totals are provided where applicable.

    "I like to be against the odds. I'm not afraid to be lonely at the top. With me, it's just the satisfaction of the game. Just performance." - Barry Bonds [Barry Bonds Quotes]
    Barry Bonds 2001 Game by Game Batting LogsIn Chronological Order / Barry Bonds Stats
    04-02-2001 *vs Padres3110011210000.333.6001.333lf
    04-04-2001 *vs Padres4111000001100.286.500.857lf
    04-05-2001 *vs Padres4110000000000.273.429.636lf
    04-06-2001 *at Dodgers4000000002000.200.333.467lf
    04-07-2001 *at Dodgers4000000000000.158.273.368lf
    04-08-2001 *at Dodgers5000000002000.125.222.292lf
    04-10-2001 *at Padres5000000001000.103.188.241lf
    04-12-2001 *at Padres3110011100000.125.222.344lf
    04-13-2001 *at Brewers3121013100001.171.268.486lf
    04-14-2001 *at Brewers4121013101000.205.304.590lf
    04-15-2001 *at Brewers3110011100000.214.320.643lf
    04-17-2001 *vs Dodgers4110012001000.217.315.674lf
    04-18-2001 *vs Dodgers4110011001000.220.310.700lf
    04-19-2001 *vs Dodgers3010000001000.226.311.679lf
    04-20-2001 *vs Brewers3110012111000.232.323.714lf
    04-21-2001vs Brewers1000000001000.228.318.702ph
    04-22-2001 *vs Brewers2000000210000.220.329.678lf
    04-24-2001 *vs Reds2110012200000.230.351.721lf
    04-25-2001 *vs Reds4011002100000.231.354.708lf
    04-26-2001 *vs Reds4121013101000.246.369.754lf
    04-27-2001 *vs Cubs2000000001100.239.368.732lf
    04-29-2001 *vs Cubs4110011001000.240.363.747lf
     April 2001 Totals
    75131850112213315201.240.363.747-
    05-01-2001 *at Pirates1200000401000.237.385.737lf
    05-02-2001 *at Pirates5110012001000.235.376.741lf
    05-03-2001 *at Pirates3130012200000.262.406.786lf
    05-04-2001 *at Phillies2110012201000.267.418.814lf
    05-05-2001 *at Phillies3100000102100.258.417.787lf
    05-06-2001at Phillies1000000001000.256.414.778ph
    05-07-2001 *vs Expos2120001200000.272.433.783lf
    05-08-2001 *vs Expos2100000200000.266.435.766lf
    05-09-2001 *vs Expos3000000003000.258.425.742lf
    05-11-2001 *vs Mets3210011200000.260.432.760lf
    05-12-2001 *vs Mets3222002101000.272.441.777lf
    05-13-2001 *vs Mets4011001001000.271.436.766lf
    05-15-2001 *at Marlins4111001102000.270.434.757lf
    05-16-2001 *at Marlins4010000000000.270.430.739lf
    05-17-2001 *at Marlins3110012101000.271.431.754lf
    05-18-2001 *at Braves3110011111000.273.433.769lf
    05-19-2001 *at Braves5341033001000.294.444.849lf
    05-20-2001 *at Braves2220022200000.305.458.898lf
    05-21-2001 *at Diamondbacks4110011000000.303.453.902lf
    05-22-2001 *at Diamondbacks3120012210000.311.463.919lf
    05-23-2001 *at Diamondbacks4020001001000.317.464.906lf
    05-24-2001 *vs Rockies3210011101000.317.464.915lf
    05-25-2001 *vs Rockies2110000200000.319.471.910lf
    05-27-2001 *vs Rockies3110012002100.320.471.918lf
    05-28-2001 *vs Diamondbacks4000000103000.311.464.894lf
    05-29-2001 *vs Diamondbacks5000000331000.301.461.865lf
    05-30-2001 *vs Diamondbacks3220023100000.308.466.899lf
     May 2001 Totals
    84283150173031524200.369.5471.036-
    06-01-2001 *at Rockies2310012320000.311.474.913lf
    06-02-2001 *at Rockies3000000202000.305.472.896lf
    06-03-2001 *at Rockies3000000000000.299.466.880lf
    06-04-2001 *vs Padres2120012110001.308.471.899lf
    06-05-2001 *vs Padres3320012201000.314.478.913lf
    06-07-2001 *vs Padres4121012101000.318.481.926lf
    06-08-2001 *at Athletics2000000200000.315.481.916dh
    06-09-2001 *at Athletics3000000212000.309.480.901dh
    06-10-2001 *at Athletics3010000100000.310.480.891lf
    06-12-2001 *vs Angels4120011000000.314.480.899lf
    06-13-2001 *vs Angels4010000003000.313.477.885lf
    06-14-2001 *vs Angels3321011210000.318.483.903lf
    06-15-2001 *vs Athletics3230022100000.328.491.934lf
    06-16-2001 *vs Athletics2000000100000.325.489.925lf
    06-17-2001 *vs Athletics3000000101000.320.485.911lf
    06-19-2001 *at Padres5130011210000.327.491.918lf
    06-20-2001 *at Padres4110013110000.325.489.920lf
    06-22-2001 *at Cardinals2200000311000.322.491.911lf
    06-23-2001 *at Cardinals3210012211000.323.493.917lf
    06-24-2001 *at Cardinals4000000100000.317.488.900lf
    06-25-2001 *vs Dodgers2100000200000.314.488.892lf
    06-26-2001 *vs Dodgers4000000102000.308.484.877lf
    06-27-2001 *vs Dodgers5011001001000.306.479.866lf
    06-29-2001 *vs Cardinals1100000300000.305.483.863lf
     June 2001 Totals
    74222230111934915001.297.514.784-
    07-01-2001 *vs Cardinals1011000300000.308.489.868lf
    07-02-2001 *at Dodgers4000000000000.303.483.853lf
    07-03-2001 *at Dodgers3000000210000.299.482.842lf
    07-04-2001 *at Dodgers4010000000100.298.481.833lf
    07-05-2001 *at Dodgers3110000101100.298.482.827lf
    07-06-2001 *vs Brewers4122000100000.302.484.829lf
    07-07-2001 *vs Brewers2110001100000.303.486.827lf
    07-08-2001 *vs Brewers5022001220000.305.487.826lf
    07-12-2001 *at Mariners5120011003000.307.486.830dh
    07-13-2001 *at Mariners5010001000000.305.482.818lf
    07-14-2001 *at Mariners4000000000000.300.477.806dh
    07-15-2001 *at Rangers4100000101000.296.473.794lf
    07-16-2001 *at Rangers1000000300000.295.476.791dh
    07-17-2001 *at Rangers2211000200000.296.479.793dh
    07-18-2001 *vs Rockies3220023001000.300.481.813lf
    07-19-2001 *vs Rockies2000000311000.298.482.807lf
    07-20-2001 *vs Diamondbacks2000000200000.296.482.801lf
    07-21-2001 *vs Diamondbacks4000000001000.292.477.790lf
    07-22-2001 *vs Diamondbacks3000000000000.289.474.782lf
    07-23-2001 *at Rockies3010000100000.290.474.778lf
    07-24-2001 *at Rockies3111000100000.290.474.777lf
    07-25-2001at Rockies1000000000000.289.473.774ph
    07-26-2001 *at Diamondbacks4320025100000.292.475.790lf
    07-27-2001 *at Diamondbacks3231011200000.299.481.805lf
    07-28-2001 *at Diamondbacks3120100211000.302.485.810lf
    07-29-2001 *at Diamondbacks4011001001000.302.483.806lf
    07-31-2001 *vs Pirates4121001201000.304.485.806lf
     July 2001 Totals
    86172610161530511200.302.492.651-
    08-01-2001 *vs Pirates4121011000000.307.485.814lf
    08-03-2001 *vs Phillies2100000100100.305.485.809lf
    08-04-2001 *vs Phillies2110012101000.306.487.817lf
    08-05-2001 *vs Phillies4021002112000.308.488.816lf
    08-07-2001 *at Reds5131013100000.313.490.824lf
    08-08-2001 *at Reds3100000213000.310.489.817lf
    08-09-2001 *at Reds5110011000000.308.486.817lf
    08-11-2001 *at Cubs4110013102000.307.485.819lf
    08-12-2001 *at Cubs4011000102000.307.484.815lf
    08-14-2001 *vs Marlins2210014310000.308.488.822lf
    08-15-2001 *vs Marlins4000000000000.304.484.813lf
    08-16-2001 *vs Marlins3220024101000.307.486.828lf
    08-17-2001 *vs Braves4010000001000.307.484.822lf
    08-18-2001 *vs Braves3120011100000.310.486.829lf
    08-19-2001 *vs Braves2100000210000.308.486.824lf
    08-21-2001 *at Expos2100000301000.306.487.820lf
    08-22-2001 *at Expos2110000200000.307.489.818lf
    08-23-2001at Expos1110011000000.309.490.827ph,lf
    08-24-2001 *at Mets3010000101000.310.490.823lf
    08-25-2001 *at Mets3110000201000.310.491.819lf
    08-26-2001 *at Mets3110101100000.310.491.820lf
    08-27-2001 *at Mets4231011100000.314.494.830lf
    08-28-2001 *at Diamondbacks2000000200000.313.494.826lf
    08-29-2001 *at Diamondbacks3010000111000.313.494.822lf
    08-30-2001 *at Diamondbacks2010000300000.314.497.820lf
    08-31-2001 *vs Rockies4110012001000.313.495.822lf
     August 2001 Totals
    80212851122631517100.350.536.888-
    09-01-2001vs Rockies0000000110000.313.496.822lf
    09-02-2001 *vs Rockies3000000111000.311.495.816lf
    09-03-2001 *vs Rockies4110011001000.310.493.818lf
    09-04-2001 *vs Diamondbacks2220011200000.314.496.826lf
    09-05-2001 *vs Diamondbacks2000000101000.312.496.822lf
    09-06-2001 *vs Diamondbacks4210011100000.312.495.824lf
    09-07-2001 *at Rockies3031001300000.317.500.827lf
    09-08-2001 *at Rockies5110000001000.315.497.820lf
    09-09-2001 *at Rockies5330035101000.319.499.838lf
    09-18-2001 *vs Astros3000000101000.316.497.833lf
    09-19-2001 *vs Astros3010000100000.316.497.829lf
    09-20-2001 *vs Astros3121013201000.319.500.837lf
    09-21-2001 *at Padres3010001100000.319.500.834lf
    09-22-2001 *at Padres4111000002000.318.498.831lf
    09-23-2001 *at Padres4320022100000.320.499.841lf
    09-24-2001 *at Dodgers3110011210000.320.500.844lf
    09-25-2001 *at Dodgers3000000200000.318.499.839lf
    09-26-2001 *at Dodgers2110000310000.319.502.837lf
    09-28-2001 *vs Padres3121013201000.321.504.845lf
    09-29-2001 *vs Padres3110011100000.321.504.848lf
    09-30-2001 *vs Padres1000000200100.320.505.846lf
     September 2001 Totals
    63182340122028410100.365.5651.000-
    10-02-2001 *at Astros2110000210100.321.508.845lf
    10-03-2001 *at Astros2310001311000.322.510.843lf
    10-04-2001 *at Astros2210011310000.323.512.848lf
    10-05-2001 *vs Dodgers3320022210000.325.514.860lf
    10-06-2001vs Dodgers1010000000000.326.515.860ph
    10-07-2001 *vs Dodgers4120011000000.328.515.863lf
     October 2001 Totals
    1410800451041100.571.7601.429-
     2001 Yearly Totals476129156322731371773593902.328.515.863-
    Barry Bonds 2001 Game by Game Batting Logs






    Giants Top Minor League Prospects

    • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
    • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
    • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
    • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
    • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
    • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
    • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
    • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
    • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
    • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
    • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
    • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
    • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
    • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

    2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

    • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
    • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
    • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
    • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
    • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

    2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

    • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
    • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
    • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
    • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
    • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.