Showing posts with label GOOD VS. EVIL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOOD VS. EVIL. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

The Emanuel Church Murders and Racial Violence | Just Facts Daily


You wouldn't get this impression by listening to the MSM. And I'm talking about both sides of the aisle here, so don't bring me your "Yeah, he's talking about CNN" or "Yeah, he's talking about Fox News" 'cause guess what Chief? I'm talking about both. And if you are an intellectual  hostage of either one of those purveyors of hate and divisiveness -- and that is what they both are -- you will never see the light.

The truth of the matter is that whites are by far the greatest killers of whites, and blacks are by far the greatest killers of blacks. As detailed in a U.S. Department of Justice study that is the source of most of the data above, from 1980 through 2008, "84% of white victims were killed by whites," and "93% of black victims were killed by blacks."
Hence, those who pin blame on any race in America for violence against another race are avoiding the much greater problem, which is people of the same races killing each other. Moreover, individuals who falsely accuse others of racism and violence are sowing the seeds of more hatred and bloodshed.
When people are misled to believe that they are being terrorized, some will inevitably strike back. This should compel all people to make sure they get the facts straight and challenge such slander as it arises.

Cut the Cord, I tell you. You won't regret it for one minute, Don't allow the mass media to control you, you control the mass media by deciding on the sources you allow in. That implies you have to make good choices in that regard. I didn't say it was going to be easy.

It seems as if we should be talking a little less about "black and white" and a little more about "love and hate" or just for giggles "good and evil".


black_murder_rate_1980-2013interracial_murders_1980-2013

Monday, June 22, 2015

Family of slain show highest expression of Christianity when confronting lowest expression of humanity » The Right Scoop -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc8yRyBll-Q

This is also one of the most remarkable things I have seen or heard in quite some time. We spend a lot of time in sports asking "Did you see this?" or Did you see that?" as if these event were the most remarkable thinks we've ever seen. This qualifies and makes some of the other things we go ga-ga over seem rather trivial.

 The good folks of this church displayed remarkable love in the face of unspeakable hate. God Bless them.


Family of slain show highest expression of Christianity when confronting lowest expression of humanity » The Right Scoop -:

There was a remarkable event that happened when the family of those slain by Dylann Roof confronted him as he appeared in court today.

Watch below:



Many saw it as the highest expression of Christianity – those forgiving a monster who had taken their loved ones away and caused them so much pain. It really is an amazing manifestation of the mercy of God. I honestly don’t think I could have that much strength to do the same only a day after the killings.
'via Blog this'

Tuesday, May 05, 2015

It’s Time for American Christians to Stand With the Persecuted | Illinois Family Institute

"Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.”  -  Edmund Burke 
Agreed.

The problem is, we then run into this quote.

"History never repeats itself but it rhymes,"  - Mark Twain
Ewww, and some people are tone deaf. This could be a problem.

If history repeated, it would be easier for us to identify the the impending doom and make an appropriate correction. "Been there, done that, won't get fooled again." But it rhymes so....

Life works that way, we get conflicting data. I'm with Elie Wiesel on this one. The cost of being wrong is too high, as we have found out in the past.

from Illinois Family Institute:
It’s Time for American Christians to Stand With the Persecuted | Illinois Family Institute:

Naive skeptics say what ISIS jihadists do across the world is no threat to American Christians. “It will never happen here,” they say, sighing that only the hysterical and paranoid believe anyone will suffer for their faith in America. 
 Indeed. 
But Jewish-American writer Elie Wiesel isn’t so sure. During his 1985 acceptance speech after being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, Wiesel shared a conversation he had with a young Jewish boy that asked him how the Holocaust could have happened.

“… 
I explained to him how naïve we were, that the world did know and remained silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation,” Wiesel said.
 “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Sometimes we must interfere. When human lives are endangered, when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Wherever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political views, that place must — at that moment — become the center of the universe.”
'via Blog this'

"Nobody really cares about philosophy in general but they do care about two areas of practical and applied philosophy and that's religion and politics. So people will talk about philosophy in general but they will never talk about philosophy in particular (specifically). People love to talk about philosophy, but they don't want to talk about the areas where philosophy is practical / applied -- which is religion and politics." - Doug Casey


from gatestoneinstitute.org
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5676/free-speech-erosion

The Erosion of Free Speech

by Denis MacEoin  •  May 3, 2015 at 5:00 am
  • "If PEN as a free speech organization can't defend and celebrate people who have been murdered for drawing pictures, then frankly the organization is not worth the name." — Salman Rushdie, former President of PEN.
  • Today, a genuine fear of retribution for a "blasphemous" statement has subdued the will to stand up for one's own beliefs, values and the right to speak out. This fear has made most of the West submissive, just as Islam -- in both its name [Islam means "submission"] and declarations -- openly wants.
  • This time, the condemnation had not come in a fatwa from Iran's Supreme leader, but from a Western academic. If we do not reverse this trend, censorship, blasphemy laws, and all the other encumbrances of totalitarians, will return to our lives. The bullies will win.
  • If Geert Wilders and others are being accused of hate speech, then why isn't the Koran -- with its calls for smiting necks and killing infidels -- also being accused of hate speech?
  • The mere criticism of a religious belief shared by many people mainly in the Third World has been linked, with no justification, to their genuine prejudice against the inhabitants of the developed world.
 http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/5675/saeed-abedini

U.S. Lets American Pastor Saeed Abedini Rot in Iran's Prison

by Uzay Bulut  •  May 3, 2015 at 4:00 am
  • "Recently, prison guards have threatened that even if he serves the full eight years, he will not be released, and that they will find new grounds to continue to hold him indefinitely." — Naghmeh Abedini, wife of Pastor Saeed Abedini.
  • Shamefully, the U.S. government has said that the four Americans being held by Iran are not even part of the current negotiations with Iran.
  • No wonder the great historian Bernard Lewis says that "America is harmless as an enemy and treacherous as a friend."

American Pastor Saeed Abedini with his family, before his imprisonment in Iran. (Image source: American Center for Law and Justice)
This week, on May 7, Saeed Abedini, an American pastor, will "celebrate" his 35th birthday behind bars in a prison for "violent offenders" in Iran, simply for being a Christian.
He has already been held in two of Iran's most brutal prisons -- first in Evin, and now in Rajai-Shahr -- for three years, out of an eight-year sentence.
According to his official website, "On 28 July 2012, during a visit to Tehran to visit family and to finalize the board members for an orphanage he was building in Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard detained Abedini, asserting that he must face criminal charges for his Christian faith."
In an interview with Gatestone Institute, Abedini's wife, Naghmeh Abedini, said that her husband is still exposed to pressures and mistreatment both from the guards and also from different Islamic militant groups within the prison:
Freedom versus coercion.


"So we fight evil and one of the great challenges with fighting evil is you cannot fight evil and the reason you cannot fight evil is that the moment that people see that it's evil it loses it's power.  What we fight is evil that people think is good." - Stephan Molyneux



Monday, October 20, 2014

Notre Dame is confused - FSU didn't get rewarded, Notre Dame got punished

“Destroy the seed of evil, or it will grow up to be your ruin” – Aesop

Seems like there is a whole lot of confusion going on at Notre Dame lately. This is what happens when you sell your soul to the devil. You should know better and lead better. Shame on Notre Dame!!!

DUDE!!! I saw the play live and I said to myself, "Dang, TWO guys blocking / setting picks down field. Easy call." and I don't even officiate football. Kelly is freaking delusional. But he fits in well with the current culture down there at South Bend. 

from Bleacher Report:
image
Kelly: FSU's Blown Coverage 'Rewarded'
Notre Dame head coach Brian Kelly was livid after a controversial offensive pass interference call wiped out the Irish's potential game-winning touchdown i...
Preview by Yahoo

Notre Dame head coach Brian Kelly was livid after a controversial offensive pass interference call wiped out the Irish's potential game-winning touchdown in their 31-27 loss Saturday to Florida State. With a day to ruminate and further clarification provided by the officiating crew, reporters asked if he better understood the call Sunday.
Nope.    
Per Matt Fortuna of ESPN.com, Kelly said:
Actually I have less clarity. I guess it was actually called on Will Fuller, not C.J. (Prosise). So [it] just adds more uncertainty as to the final play. But again, the play itself, in terms of what we ask our kids to do, it was pretty clear what happened on the play: Florida State blew the coverage and they got rewarded for it. It's unfortunate.
However, ACC coordinator of football officials Doug Rhoads defended the crew's call Sunday. Rhoads specifically cites the wide receivers blocking downfield on a forward pass as a violation, noting that neither player attempted to run a route.
"Offensive players on passing plays are restricted from going downfield and blocking anytime from the snap," Rhoads said, per Zach Barnett of College Football Talk. "If the ball is first touched behind the line of scrimmage then that would be legal and it's okay, but if it's touched beyond the line then it's offensive pass interference."
But this is an institution that has been selling out for quit a while now, so why should anybody be surprised. I liked them better when they at least gave the impressions that they stood for something. They have not just lowered their standards lately as many in the "win at all costs crowd" clamored for, they have pile driven their standards into the ground. Shame on Notre Dame!!!




from canonlawblog.com
image
Notre Dame is confused
The University of Notre Dame has decided "to extend benefits to all legally married persons, including same-sex spouses…." Renowned Notre Dame law pro...
Preview by Yahoo

Renowned Notre Dame law professor Gerry Bradley has set out the civil law options Notre Dame could have pursued and Bp. Kevin Rhoades has put the university on notice that their decision does not seem commensurate with the duties Catholic institutions owe to Catholic (not to mention natural law) truths.



Saturday, December 10, 2011

Income Inequality Rose Most Under President Clinton - Investors.com


I'm not sure if this one article knocks down the bulk of the OWS'ers basic thesis and arguments one by one. So the Gini coefficient, the best measure of income inequality did worse under Republicans Reagan-Bush-Bush than it has under The Dems Clinton-Obama. If the Repubs are the party of the rich -- and that's the mantra we hear screeched the most -- then they may need to ask for a refund.

Great read. Of course, you won't see it reported by any of the MSM pundits. There, the truth hurts, even though most of us know that the truth shall set you free. They have never been know to let the facts get in the way of a good story either.

H/T to the Conservative Manifesto blog who sent me a heads up to the story. More food for thought on the Gini coefficient and income inequality from another favorite blogger 'Whiskey and Gunpowder'.

Income Inequality Rose Most Under President Clinton - Investors.com: "Income Inequality Rose Most Under President Clinton

By JOHN MERLINE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 11/03/2011 08:05 AM ET

In his weekend radio address, President Obama decried that "over the past three decades, the middle class has lost ground while the wealthiest few have become even wealthier." Although he was trying to leverage the Occupy Wall Street movement, the income gap has been a longstanding concern of his."

During the 2008 campaign, Obama said, "The project of the next president is figuring out how do you create bottom-up economic growth, as opposed to the trickle-down economic growth that George Bush has been so enamored with."

But it turns out that the rich actually got poorer under President Bush, and the income gap has been climbing under Obama.

What's more, the biggest increase in income inequality over the past three decades took place when Democrat Bill Clinton was in the White House.

The wealthiest 5% of U.S. households saw incomes fall 7% after inflation in Bush's eight years in office, according to an IBD analysis of Census Bureau data. A widely used household income inequality measure, the Gini index, was essentially flat over that span. Another inequality gauge, the Theil index, showed a decline.

In contrast, the Gini index rose — slightly — in Obama's first two years. Another Census measure of inequality shows it's climbed 5.7% since he took office.

Meanwhile, during Clinton's eight years, the wealthiest 5% of American households saw their incomes jump 45% vs. 26% under Reagan. The Gini index shot up 6.7% under Clinton, more than any other president since 1980.


To the extent that income inequality is a problem, it's not clear what can be done to resolve it. Among the contributing factors:

Economic growth. Strong economic growth, rising stock prices and household income inequality tend to go hand in hand.

Technology. Tech advances have put a premium on skilled labor, according to a Congressional Budget Office report . Because the pool of skilled workers hasn't grown as much as demand, their wages have climbed faster.

Free trade and immigration. Cheap labor abroad and an influx in low-skilled immigrants can depress wages at the bottom, according to the CBO.

Women in the workforce. As the CBO put it, "an increase in the earnings of women could boost inequality by raising the income of couples relative to that of households headed by single people."

Tax policy changes don't explain the widening income gap. The CBO found that, by one measure, "the federal tax system as a whole is about as progressive in 2007 as it was in 1979."




-----
From the Conservative Manifesto blog:



Posted: 07 Nov 2011 08:07 AM PST

In a time of rampant (not to mention criminal) Occupy mobs, this should be a bubble burster.

The wealthiest 5% of U.S. households saw incomes fall 7% after inflation in Bush's eight years in office, according to an IBD analysis of Census Bureau data. A widely used household income inequality measure, the Gini index, was essentially flat over that span. Another inequality gauge, the Theil index, showed a decline.

In contrast, the Gini index rose — slightly — in Obama's first two years. Another Census measure of inequality shows it's climbed 5.7% since he took office.

Meanwhile, during Clinton's eight years, the wealthiest 5% of American households saw their incomes jump 45% vs. 26% under Reagan. The Gini index shot up 6.7% under Clinton, more than any other president since 1980.




Of all the places the Occupy children have infested, it's a wonder 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. isn't one of them.



----------
From Whiskey and Gunpowder:

The Income Gap Obsession

Nov 8th, 2011 | By Jeffrey Tucker
http://whiskeyandgunpowder.com/the-income-gap-obsession/

The word “equality” is being rammed down our throats every day, with special focus on the so-called “income gap.” The presumption is that we should all denounce the gap, work to eliminate it and embrace perfect equality as an ideal.

It’s true that inequality is growing, but the focus on that alone is sheer folly. Equality applies to math equations. You could also use it to describe how the law should be impartial with respect to persons — the traditional use of the term “equality” in the classical liberal literature. But that’s it. Otherwise, an obsession with this topic is very dangerous for a free society.

That’s because the people who invoke equality have no intention of creating the conditions to make it easier for the poor and for middle-income earners to grow rich. Leveling upward is never the goal. Egalitarians want to flatten incomes at the top so that the rich no longer exist. This can’t help anyone but the envious, those who get a kick out of destroying, rather than creating.

As Shikha Dalmia writes, “Income inequality tells us zilch about the only thing that really matters: Are the lives of Americans, rich, poor and in between, getting better or worse?”

Try an experiment in your mind with a society of 10 people. Five people earn $50,000 and five earn $100,000. Let’s say we flatten out the top half so that everyone earns the same. Equality! But who benefits? Absolutely no one. Society as a whole is poorer, and that is to the detriment of everyone: less capital, less wealth available for wealth-forming projects, demoralization among the smartest and most inspired and a ceiling on those who might have previously desired to move from the lower half to the upper half.

In any case, the supposed egalitarian ideal can always be achieved by driving everyone into the dirt and universalizing poverty. There is a serious problem, with an ideal that can be achieved by wrecking the lives of absolutely everyone.

In a free society, we just have to get used to the idea that some people are going to be vastly richer than other people. And those rich people do act as benefactors to the rest of us. They give more to charity. They start the new businesses that employ us. They take the risks that make capitalism dynamic and progressive. They act as society’s economic leadership team. And the individual members of that sector of society are constantly changing, and this is a good thing.

What’s more, in a free society, the rich are completely dependent on the poor and the middle class, who, in a market setting, make it possible for the capitalists of society to accumulate wealth in the first place. It is the voluntary choices of the masses that direct the use of society’s resources. The “distribution” of wealth is a result of the choices we all make in our capacity as consumers.

Yes, I’ve watched lectures by people who claim that societies with more equality are happier places. What they end up pointing to are places like Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Japan, Norway. This is just a mistake: These countries are demographically homogeneous and cannot be compared in any way to places like the U.K. or the U.S.

Consider this… Where would you rather live? Ethiopia or the Netherlands? Ethiopia has more income equality, according to the statisticians who calculate the so-called Gini coeffiicient. Another example: Tajikistan or Switzerland? The former has more equality than the latter. Another: Bangladesh or New Zealand? According to the egalitarians, we should rather live in one of the poorest places on the planet than one of the richest.

Again, the degree of equality is not in any sense related to the quality of life.


So why the hysteria right now? The real problem is more fundamental in the United States. The poor are growing and entrenching. The unemployed are staying this way. The middle class is slipping, and more substantially after the the recession statistically ended than when the statistical recession was on (and polls show that hardly anyone believes we are out of recession).

Now, this is catastrophic, not because this increases the income gap, but because it is killing the American dream. What the political left is doing is attempting to change the subject away from what matters (we are all getting poor) to what doesn’t matter (the income gap between the top and bottom). And this rhetorical shift is scary: It prepares the way for higher taxes, more redistribution, more attacks on the financially successful and more of all the policies that are causing our worst problems right now.

So why the focus on the equality? As Mises says in his great work Socialism (1922): “The principle of equality is most acclaimed by those who expect to gain more than they lose from an equal distribution of goods. Here is a fertile field for the demagogue. Whoever stirs up the resentment of the poor against the rich can count on securing a big audience.”

Americans should know better. Even when our economy was the freest in the world, we had one of the most unequal distributions of that wealth on the planet. It was during these years that the lifespans of everyone increased, when the chances of moving from poor to rich were huge, when the per capita income was growing as never before in human history. Growing inequality is likely to coincide with growing wealth (see How the West Grew Rich, the masterpiece by Nathan Rosenber).

We need to learn to admire the justly rich and strive to emulate them and their outlook on life. This is what the advice manuals of the late 19th century said. The most popular magazines of the time chronicled their lives, and they were held up as national heroes. This is a sign of a healthy society. It is because of this ethos that the poor of today live vastly better than the richest of the rich 100 years ago.

Today, on the other hand, we are told to resent the rich, attack them, hate them, expropriate them. This is the sure path to disaster. Freedom is what enables the poor to become rich. The state is the means by which everyone in society is driven into poverty. We need less state and more freedom.





----

From Mish Shedlock's Economic Trend Analysis Blog:



Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis:


Note that Obama projected the unemployment rate to be under 6% now according to projections of the the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

The only reason the unemployment rate is not 11% (or higher) is because 4.5 million people dropped out of the labor force vs. expected demographic gains."

With all these financial issues swimming about and morphing into election / campaign issues, I'm reminded of the following two quotes from the past.

“How did you go bankrupt?"
Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly.” -― Ernest Hemingway, The Sun Also Rises

This is how I'm afraid we'll go down if we do not get our fiscal house in order. Gradually and then suddenly. And the steps we are taking to FIX the crisis -- the "hair of the dog that bit you" strategy of more debt to cure a debt crisis, money printing and creation ad-nauseam, will also create an inflationary crisis (hyper-inflationary / currency crisis) that could lead to a GREAT-GREAT DEPRESSION.

And to all the OWS'ers and their supporters:

Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard. -- H. L. Mencken

It's not a democracy folks, it's a republic.

Pure Democracy is evil.
http://www.albatrus.org/english/goverment/democracy/pure%20democracy%20is%20evil.htm


"Democracy substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few." --
George Bernard Shaw

"The majority is never right. Never, I tell you! That's one of these lies in society that no free and intelligent man can ever help rebelling against. Who are the people that make up the biggest proportion of the population --- the intelligent ones or the fools? I think we can agree it's the fools, no matter where you go in this world, it's the fools that form the overwhelming majority." -- Henrik Ibsen

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Kaleb Eulls makes the ultimate highlight film play



Kaleb Eulls is a 6 foot 4, 255 pound, do-everything, ambidextrous QB and DE for Yazoo County HS in Mississippi. Did I mention he also handles the punting duties as well as kickoffs and extra points?

He received scholarship offers from football powerhouses like Florida, LSU and Georgia. He committed this summer to play for Mississippi State. He has the kind of ability that makes the recruiting message boards light up and the antennae on Mel Kiper and Todd McShay's future stars list begins to do a little shimmy-shake.

Did I mention that he is also a great student? So what must this already well-recognized and honored football "hero" do to garner national attention?

ROLL THE TAPE!!!
FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS YOU TUBE SITE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37LBPtT5Am8


Was that the type of highlight film you expected? The voice coming from the back of the bus saying "I've got the gun" was from Kaleb. Probably the most important "forced fumble and recovery" he will ever make.

READ MORE INCREDIBLE DETAILS OF THE STORY FROM MOSPORTS.RIVALS.COM
http://mosports.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=985823


Doesn't the title of the story just say it all?
Kaleb Eulls' heroic action a decade in the making

Although on the surface, this seems like the prototypical man bites dog story--people just don't make this type of heroic action normally, do they?--if we look to the world of academia, maybe that perception doesn't have to be so.

Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford professor, coined the term "Banality of Heroism" to describe the phenomenon in his book "The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil".

In the book Zimbardo illustrates through his shocking Stanford Prison Experiment how easy it is for "normal" people to commit heinous acts when put in a unique cauldron of circumstances. This highlighted the "Banality of Evil" concept described by Hannah Arendt in her work titled "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil"

http://www.lucifereffect.org/heroism.htm


Although much of the Lucifer Effect text revolves around the negatives of human behavior, salvation comes in the final chapter (16) where I flip the coin and celebrate what is best in humanity-- those among us who move from passive observers to take heroic action. In celebrating heroism, I challenge the traditional view of heroes as extraordinary people, as super-special agents of noble deeds. In doing so, I distinguish between those rare people whose whole lives are centered around sacrifice for the good of society or for the well being of their fellows, chronic heroes, and those ordinary folks who are moved to an heroic deed in a specific situation at a particular time.

Their heroic deeds are always special, but these heroes are just plain folks, ordinary citizens, who “do what they had to do” when moved to action by some call to service. Typically, they say, “It was nothing special;” “I did what anyone would do in that situation.” And some add, “and what everyone ought to do.” I refer to this phenomenon as “the banality of heroism.” Doing so, obviously trades off of its similar opposite in the phrase coined by Hannah Arendt, “the banality of evil,” that she used to describe why modern criminals, like Nazi Adolph Eichmann were so frightening precisely because they are “terrifyingly normal.”

We also want to believe that there is something IN some people that drives them toward evil, while there is something different IN others that drives them toward good. It is an obvious notion but there is no hard evidence to support that dispositional view of evil and good, certainly not the inner determinants of heroism. There may be, but I need to see reliable data before I am convinced. Till then, I am proposing we focus on situational determinants of evil and good, trying to understand what about certain behavioral settings pushes some of us to become perpetrators of evil, others to look the other way in the presence of evil doers, tacitly condoning their actions and thus being guilty of the evil of inaction, while others act heroically on behalf of those in need or righting injustice. Some situations can inflame the “hostile imagination,” propelling good people to do bad deeds, while something in that same setting can inspire the “heroic imagination” propelling ordinary people toward actions that their culture at a given time determines is “heroic.” I argue in Lucifer and recent essays, that follow here, it is vital for every society to have its institutions teach heroism, building into such teachings the importance of mentally rehearsing taking heroic action—thus to be ready to act when called to service for a moral cause or just to help a victim in distress.



MORE FROM ZIMBARDO REGARDING THE BANALITY OF HEROSIM:
http://www.november.org/BottomsUp/reading/banality.html

Historical inquiry and behavioral science have demonstrated the "banality of evil" -- that is, under certain conditions and social pressures, ordinary people can commit acts that would otherwise be unthinkable.


But because evil is so fascinating, we have been obsessed with focusing upon and analyzing evildoers. Perhaps because of the tragic experiences of the Second World War, we have neglected to consider the flip side of the banality of evil: Is it also possible that heroic acts are something that anyone can perform, given the right mind-set and conditions? Could there also be a "banality of heroism"?

The banality of heroism concept suggests that we are all potential heroes waiting for a moment in life to perform a heroic deed. The decision to act heroically is a choice that many of us will be called upon to make at some point in time. By conceiving of heroism as a universal attribute of human nature, not as a rare feature of the few "heroic elect," heroism becomes something that seems in the range of possibilities for every person, perhaps inspiring more of us to answer that call.




It's clear that we will always have this battle of "good" vs. "evil". It illustrates the importance of having a solid base of character development so that we understand when the proper time and place to stand up and say "NO!!" arises, whether it's confronting a teen with a gun or an authority figure asking to do that which you know is wrong, you will have the strength to act heroically.

Too often we are almost comforted by the fact that perceived "evil-doers" are "not like us". We don't want to hear that we may all be capable of perpetrating similar crimes if we were put in similar settings. The works of Zimbardo and the famous Milgrim experiments at Harvard clearly demonstrates the fallacy of clinging to those inconvenient truths.

By the same token, we are too often led to believe that these heroic actions are anomalies as well. We couldn't do that, COULD WE? Well, why the heck not?

The quote from Kaleb's high school coach wraps it up best:

“I’m very proud of him,” Eulls’ football coach Matt Williams said. “He doesn’t have to score any more touchdowns or make any sacks, he is probably the greatest kid I’ll ever be a part of.”


HOW COOL IS THAT!!!!

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

NIU Coping






NIU students returned to campus Monday after the university was closed for nearly a week following the tragic shooting last week. Faculty, students and parents are left to answer perhaps the unanswerable question: WHY?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM THE DAILY HERALD:
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=137620

Family and friends have started burying the victims.

Many of the wounded are healing, at least physically.

But five days after that bloody Valentine's Day at Northern Illinois University, it seems increasingly doubtful the public will ever know exactly why the gunman walked into a lecture hall and opened fire on scores of unsuspecting students.

How to Help
# MEMORIAL FUND - DeKalb and Sycamore business associations have established a fund to help erect a community memorial in remembrance of the five lives lost in Thursday's shootings. To donate, visit www.dekalb.org.
# MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND - NIU has established a scholarship fund in memory of the five students slain Feb. 14. To contribute, visit webcluster.niu. edu/CreditCard/fdn2_step1.html or call (877) 448-2648.

Yet, those close to him say he seemed normal to them, and several teachers and friends still can't grasp that the ace student who studied social justice and the mentally ill was so troubled himself.

"He was kind, well-mannered, quick with a smile. He wanted to do his best," said NIU sociology professor Kristen Myers in an e-mail Monday. "Regardless, he chose an abominable path on his last day. His victims and their families were seemingly arbitrary targets, and I grieve for them."

Baty of Wonder Lake said she had no indication her boyfriend was having serious mental health issues. She said he was seeing a psychiatrist once a month and wanted to stop taking the anti-depressants because "he wanted to deal with his problems and not have to use medications."

Baty described her boyfriend as harmless, and that she didn't see anything wrong with him in the weeks leading up to the murders.

"I was with him all the time," she said. "How could I not have seen this coming? I feel partially responsible because maybe I should have seen something."

------------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the more troubling aspects to this story is that in the post event analysis, there may not be anything we can do as a society to prevent these types of things from happening periodically.

Sure, you'll hear the pros and cons from the gun control advocates and defenders of the 2nd Amendment. They will reflexively seek to capitalize on stories such as these to promote their agendas every time they crop up. That's the political reality.

But what troubles many people is, how can something like this happen and nobody sees the signs? It would make more sense if the guy was a prototypical Hollywood lunatic. One who the neighbors would say things like, "Oh yeah, we always new Johnny was going to go off. It was just a matter of time." But you never hear that. And while in this case--as well as the Virginia Tech case--there were signals that in hindsight would have provided clues that the perpetrator was perhaps a troubled individual, they could not accurately predict the tragic events to follow.

Perhaps the scariest truth is not that these events occur at all, but perhaps that they don't occur more often. How many other people could be described as "troubled" as the NIU student is currently described? Or worse. How many are struggling with depression issues and trying, often unsuccessfully, to find the answers with the aid of pharmaceuticals? How many times do we joke about someone having a bad day as being "off their meds"?

Maybe instead of this being defined as a gun control issue it should be looked at a mental health issue and the failure of Big Pharma and the medical community to come up with effective protocols for dealing with these issues effectively. That seems to be where these stories should be pointed but the public debate always seems to go off in an entirely different direction. Interesting.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


THOUGHTS ON GOOD VS. EVIL: HANNAH ARENDT AND "THE BANALITY OF EVIL"
http://www.radioopensource.org/hannah-arendt-and-the-banality-of-evil/

Hannah Arendt coined the term “banality of evil” while covering the 1961 trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi official charged with the orderly extermination of
Europe’s Jews.

Arendt herself was a German-Jewish exile struggling in the most personal of ways to come to grips with the utter destruction of European society.

In a series of articles for The New Yorker that later became the book
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, Arendt tried to tackle a string of questions not necessarily answered by the trial itself:

Where does evil come from?
Why do people commit evil acts?
How are those people different from the rest of us?

Her conclusions were profound:
People who do evil are not necessarily monsters; sometimes they’re just bureaucrats.

The Eichmann she observed on trial was neither brilliant nor a sociopath.

He was described by the attending court psychiatrist as a “completely normal man, more normal, at any rate, than I am after examining him.”

Evil, Arendt suggests, can be extraordinary acts committed by otherwise unremarkable people.

[Arendt] insisted that only good had any depth. Good can be radical; evil can never be radical, it can only be extreme, for it possesses neither depth nor any
demonic dimension yet — and this is its horror! — it can spread like a fungus over the surface of the earth and lay waste the entire world.

Evil comes from a failure to think. It defies thought for as soon as thought tries to engage itself with evil and examine the premises and principles from
which it originates, it is frustrated because it finds nothing there. That is the banality of evil.

In the past forty years Arendt’s ideas have been championed in two landmark psychological experiments — Stanley Milgram’s electroshock experiment and Philip
Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment — but decried by luminaries like Norman Mailer.

Even if the phrase itself has lost some of its punch through sheer repetition, the ideas it embodies are no less relevant. It’s hard to talk about real-world
horrors like the Rwandan genocide or torture at Abu Ghraib without referencing Arendt.

So for her centennial we’re reminding ourselves why her ideas still matter. Help us out by taking a stab at some of her initial questions:
Where does evil come from?
Why do people commit evil?
Do you buy Arendt’s thesis, or do you think there is something else (be it religious or biological) that leads to evil and distinguishes good from evil people?

Saturday, February 02, 2008

SUPER BOWL XLII PREVIEW



Perhaps not since the Christians faced off against the Lions in ancient Rome has there been a more one-sided match up of foes as we will see in Super Bowl XLII.

Interesting that since the days of the Roman Empire, there has been a need for societies rulers to keep the masses in tow and their attention diverted from the important issues of the day (sound familiar?). The premise was that you could give people some relatively cheap entertainment so that they would--at least temporarily-- forget their grievances against the collective shortcomings of their rulers or political system.

It just seems as if it will all come together so perfectly tomorrow. The Super Bowl is the ultimate TV event. The ultimate "opiate of the masses" if you will. And with all the other side issues circling over the event, yet to be resolved, it makes for both perfect theater as well as a perfect teaching and learning moment for the country.

Arlen Specter may or may not be able to call Commissar Goodell on the carpet to explain the inexplicable. Why he punished the Patriots for wrongdoing and then destroyed the evidence of the wrongdoing, which smacks of a cover-up (remember, it's not the crime, it's the cover-up) I just can not explain. But he has multiple billions of reasons (measured in dollars of revenue) to protect the NFL's image at all costs.

At first blush, his explanation that any advantage Bellicheat and the Pats may have gained from the illegal videotaping was "limited." I'm sure the Nixon Administration tried to sail similar logic past the public when the initial details of the Watergate break-in and cover-up were uncovered, and look what it did for Nixon.

After the Super Bowl, it seems that Congress will attempt in earnest to determine what most already suspect. Bill Belichick is a cheater, albeit an equal opportunity cheater. He cheats on the field as well as off the field. And Congress will do this if only to show they can come together on certain select issues like this and steroids in baseball, but continue to fail to come together on issues that make real differences in real peoples lives. Amazing.

As far as defining Coach Bellicheats character--I would just like to know from Pats apologists--how do you respond to the following questions?:

How do you explain the reports that Coach Bellicheat was the "other man" who helped break up his secretary's marriage by chasing her around the desk too much?

FROM SPORTSBYBROOKS.COM
http://www.sportsbybrooks.com/both-of-new-england-coachs-beli-chicks-at-sb-15755

How do you explain Spygate? Just a one-time thing, like Andy Pettitte's dalliances with HGH? It was just to prepare for the Jets that week? The 4-12 Jets you had to skirt the rules to try and beat?

What's that? The media told you not to worry, Spygate was nothing. Just a one-time thing, right? It doesn't have any effect or in any way tarnish any of their Super Bowl victories, correct? HAHAHAHAHA.

All the talking heads on ESPN who continue to spit that logic, as well as the one about the NFL having the toughest PED policy and NO PROBLEM WITH PED USE ought to be writing fairy tales. Just don't read them to kids.

Tell me, how do we explain away the recent reports that indicate the Patriots taped the Rams walk-through prior to their very first Super Bowl XXXVI victory six years ago? You remember, back when they were supposedly David and the Rams were Goliath.

FROM THE BOSTON HERALD:
http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/football/patriots/view.bg?articleid=1070762&srvc=sports&position=0

The one where "team unity" banded together to overcome the mighty Rams offense. Well, I guess if you knew in advance what they planned to focus on offensively either through having their signs or effectively, their game plan, it's easy to acquire the label of defensive genius that it now appears Bellicheat does not deserve.

It all made for a cute story for the media to serve up and salivate over, but it now is beginning to appear more and more like it was a story built upon a lie and a cheat. And for the story to be promoted as it was by the media, who are supposed to be the guardians of fairness and integrity in sports. What say you now, fellas?

The media missed the boat on the steroid story that grew right under their own eyes.
Now it appears as if they missed out on the Spygate story, even though it also appeared to grow and flourish right under their own eyes. That's a big oh-for-two if you're scoring at home, or even if you're all by yourself. HAHAHAHAHA.

And yet the media wants to continue to be the arbiters of righteousness and fairness and integrity in sports? Give me a break.

I know, I'll make it easy on you to cut through all this bullshit once and for all. So you can get things right for a change, right from the get go. Just imagine how quickly you would jump on this story, how rapidly you would turn it into the biggest issue the country faces, if it were noted Christian and man of character Tony Dungy who was suspected of cheating and wrongdoing.

You would have thrown him to the lions quicker than the Romans. You would have strung him up and brought up on charges in the court of public opinion.

In my opinion, Dungy and his legacy are harmed the most by this. Imagine how many rings he might have now if everyone was playing on a "level playing field".

Maybe Peyton Manning would be the one hanging and banging with multiple Super Models and multiple Super Bowl rings and God knows what else instead of little Tommy Brady.

Nah, Peyton has too much class and character. And so does Dungy. That's why the media will never fight or dig for guys like that. They wouldn't know class and character if it punched most of them right in the face.

And how about Dick Vermeil? The Patriots cheated and still barely beat 'em? Yeah Bellicheat's a real genius all-right. Another Super Bowl victory makes him an all-time great coach, right?

Tomorrow, the Giants will be served up as a foe against the Patriots and like the Christians of yore, will seemingly only have their faith in each other to give them any chance at victory. That and the collective spirit of those who would rather not see cheaters continue to prosper.

I hate to make it as serious as a clash of good vs. evil, but in this case, I think I will. The Giants simply must win, and I believe they will win. God help us if they don't. What will we tell the children when such blatant cheaters are allowed to prosper? I guess I could do the Roger Goodell thing and try to cover it all up. Nah, not a good choice there.

The Giants faith in each other will propel them to victory.

"Be thou faithful unto death and I will give thee a crown of life." Revelations 2:10

http://www.mainlesson.com/display.php?author=church&book=lions&story=lions
From the book: To the Lions, A Tale of the Early Christians, by Professor Alfred J. Church

"HE HATH SHUT THE LION'S MOUTH."

The Patriots want to join the Dolphins in as a part of football immortality as the only undefeated teams in history, but as much as they and their lackeys in the media and the NFL executive suite want to cover it up, they know in their heart and soul that they do not deserve it. They are not worthy of the honor and they have not earned it. They will fail under the collective weight of their organizational guilt.

AND THE LION'S MOUTH SHALL BE SHUT

It will be the Giants who are granted their slice of football immortality, since they have endured much this season and continued to keep the faith when others of lesser strength gave up on them. They will have earned and deserved the praise that is given to them. Call it karma, call it faith, call it what you will.

GIANTS TO WIN SUPER BOWL XLII.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

MAYBE THE ROCKIES ARE GOD'S TEAM



The Rockies approach, as noted in a post from 2006 cited below, has paid off in spades. They are in the World Series.

The pressure now turns to the Devil Rays to get there. The Marlins have made it to the World Series and won. The Diamondbacks have made it and won. And now the Rockies have made it and have a punchers chance, a David vs. Goliath chance I suppose if the Red Sox make it. The Rockies get to take some time off and realign their pitching rotation, but you have to think that as hot as they are, they would just as soon keep playing everyday. Just a historically phenomenal stretch run just to make it to the playoffs. A one-game, do or die against Jake Peavy to get in and now quick dust offs of the Phillies and the D-Backs.

Looking ahead to the Big Show, can there be a better potential World Series match up than Cleveland - Rocks ?? It's meant to be. Two newbies, another team with a long string of futility could finally reward it fans patience, putting further pressure on the Giants and the Cubbies to participate.

GO ROCKIES!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THIS IS FROM JUNE 8, 2006 POST @ Yahoo Discussion Board:

Interesting stuff from Dave Zirin and the "Edge of Sports". It must be difficult
for them to distinguish between those that can talk the talk, and
those that can walk the walk.

Sure every player says, "I'm a warrior", "I have what
it takes". They all think they have the requisite work
ethic and character. Most don't know what the word
character means.

Baseball is the ultimate character game however. And
it doesn't necessarily build character as much as it
reveals it. Although for most players, true character
is not revealed until times are tough and they can't
make the tough decisions, the right decisions. Sooner
or later, true character is revealed.

It's good to see an organization applying this type of
litmus test to it's players. While I'm sure it won't
be applied perfectly, I'll bet they will be able to
get rid of a lot of "players" and find out who the
true players are.

Too many organizations have the philosophy "We'd draft
Charles Manson if he could hit the curve ball or run
the 40 in 4.4." Who wants to see scumbags like that
succeed?

Go get 'em Rockies..weed out those with weak
character, you'll be better off in the long run.


Thu Jun 8, 2006 11:09 pm

Go Tell it on the Rockies: Baseball's Faith-based Team

This article can be found on the web at
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060619/zirin

by Dave Zirin

In Colorado, there stands a holy shrine called Coors
Field. On this
site, named for the holiest of beers, a team plays
that has been chosen
by Jesus Christ himself to play .500 baseball in the
National League
West. And if you don't believe me just ask the
manager, the general
manager, and the team's owner.

In a remarkable article from Wednesday's USA Today,
the Colorado
Rockies went public with the news that the
organization has been explicitly looking for players
with "character". And according to the Tribe of Coors,
"character" means accepting Jesus Christ as your
personal lord and savior. "We're nervous, to be honest
with you," Rockies General Manager Dan O'Dowd said.
"It's the first time we ever talked about these issues
publicly. The last thing we want to do is offend
anyone because of our beliefs." When people are
nervous that their beliefs will offend, its usually
because their beliefs are offensive.

As Rockies chairman and CEO Charlie Monfort said, "We
had to go to
hell and back to know where the Holy Grail is. We went
through a tough time and took a lot of arrows,"

Club president Keli McGregor McGregor chimed in, "Who
knows where we go from here? The ability to handle
success will be a big part of the
story, too. [Note to Keli: you're in fourth place.]
There will be
distractions. There will be things that can change
people. But we truly
do have something going on here. And (God's) using us
in a powerful
way."

Well, someone is using somebody, but it ain't God.
San Francisco
Giants first baseman-outfielder Mark Sweeney, who
spent 2003 and 2004 with the Rockies told Nightengale.
"You wonder if some people are going along with it
just to keep their jobs. Look, I pray every day. I
have faith. It's always been part of my life. But I
don't want something
forced on me. Do they really have to check to see
whether I have a
Playboy in my locker?"

Then there is manager Clint Hurdle and GM O'Dowd.
Hurdle who has guided the team to a Philistine 302-376
record since 2002, as well as fourth or fifth place
finishes every year, was rewarded with a 2007 contract
extension in the off-season. Hurdle also claims he
became a Christian three years ago and says, "We're
not going to hide it. We're not going to deny it. This
is who we are."

O'Dowd, who also received a contract extension,
believes that their
27-26 2006 record has resulted from the active
intervention of the
almighty. "You look at things that have happened to us
this year. You
look at some of the moves we made and didn't make. You
look at some of the games we're winning. Those aren't
just a coincidence. God has
definitely had a hand in this." Or maybe the
management that prays
together gets paid together.

O'Dowd and company bend over backwards in the article
to say they are "tolerant" of other views on the club,
but that's contradicted by
statements like this from CEO Montfort: "I don't want
to offend anyone,
but I think character-wise we're stronger than anyone
in baseball.
Christians, and what they've endured, are some of the
strongest people
in baseball. I believe God sends signs, and we're
seeing those."
Assumedly, Shawn Green (Jew), Ichiro Suzuki (Shinto),
or any of the
Godless players from Cuba don't have the "character"
Montfort is
looking for.

Also, there are only two African-American players on
the Rockies active roster. Is this because Montfort
doesn't think Black
players have character? Does the organization endorse
the statement of their stadium's namesake William
Coors, who told a group of black
businessmen in 1984 that Africans "... lack the
intellectual capacity
to succeed, and it's taking them down the tubes"?
These are admittedly
difficult questions. But they are the questions that
need to be posed
when the wafting odor of discrimination clouds the
air.

Then there are the fans. I spoke with journalist Tom
Krattenmaker who
has studied the connection between religion and
sports. Krattenmaker
said, "I have concerns about what this
Christianization of the Rockies
means for the community that supports the team in and
around Denver--a community in which evangelical
Christians are probably a minority, albeit a large and
influential one. Taxpayers and ticket-buyers in a
religiously diverse community have a right not to see
their team--a quasi-public resource--used for the
purpose of advancing a specific form of religion. Have
the Colorado Rockies become a faith-based
organization? This can be particularly problematic
when the religion in question is one that makes
exclusive claims and sometimes denigrates the validity
of other belief systems."

You might think MLB Commissioner Bud Selig would have
something
stirring to say about this issue. But Bud, who hasn't
actually
registered a pulse since 1994, only said meekly, "They
have to do what
they feel is right."

It's not surprising Bud would play it soft. First and
foremost, Bud's number one commandment is "Thou shall
not criticize the team owners." Also Bud and Major
League Baseball are experimenting for the first time
this year with something called "Faith Days at the
Park." As if last season's Military Appreciation
Night's weren't enough, the New York Times reported
yesterday that this summer "the religious promotions
will hit Major League Baseball. The Atlanta Braves are
planning three Faith Days this season, the Arizona
Diamondbacks one. The Florida Marlins have tentatively
scheduled a Faith Night for September. These religious
promotions are attractive to owners because they
leverage a market of evangelical Christians who are
accustomed to mass worship in stadiums at events
staged by sports-driven proselytizers like the Promise
Keepers and Athletes in Action.

As part of the MLB promotion, local churches will get
discounted
tickets to family-friendly evenings of music and
sports with a
Christian theme. And in return, they mobilize their
vast infrastructure
of e-mail and phone lists, youth programs and
chaperones, and of course their bus fleets, to help
fill the stands."

At one of the Faith Days in Atlanta, the team will
sell special
vouchers. After the game, the stands will be cleared
and then only
those with the specially purchased vouchers can be
readmitted. Those
lucky chosen "will be treated to an hour and a half of
Christian music
and a testimonial from the ace pitcher John Smoltz."
Smoltz is the
player who in 2004, opined on gay marriage to the
Associated Press
saying, "What's next? Marrying an animal?" Good times
for the whole
family.

The Rockies right now are a noxious reflection of a
time in US history
when generals speak of crusades, and the President
recounts his
personal conversations with Yahweh. ("You're doing a
heckuva job
Goddy!")

If Monfort, O'Dowd, and Hurdle want to pray on their
own time, more
power to them. But the ballpark isn't a church. John
Smoltz isn't a
preacher And fans aren't a flock. Instead using their
position of
commercial power to field a God Squad, the Rockies
might want to think about getting some decent players.
There was once this guy named Babe Ruth. Not too much
for the religion, and his character was less than
sterling. But I hear he could play some decent ball.

Dave Zirin is the author of "'What's My Name Fool?'":
Sports and Resistance in the United States. He is
speaking at the conference Socialism 2006, June 22-25,
in New York City, with Etan Thomas and Toni Smith. See
www.socialismconference.org. Contact him at
dave@edgeofsports.com

Giants Top Minor League Prospects

  • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
  • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
  • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
  • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
  • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
  • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
  • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
  • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
  • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
  • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
  • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
  • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
  • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
  • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

  • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
  • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
  • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
  • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
  • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

  • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
  • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
  • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
  • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
  • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.