Showing posts with label LEADERSHIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LEADERSHIP. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

LEADERSHIP: When You Follow Well, You Lead Well.




NBA Player, Chauncey Billups, said, "To be a good leader, at some point you have to be a good follower. I was always a good follower. I always followed the right people and listened to the right things. Those helped shape me as a leader." So, are you a good follower?

I can't tell you how many times I have heard "Are you a leader or a follower?" when I was growing up. A subtle principle was communicated through that question: "be a leader not a follower!"

But if everyone is leading, then who is following? I have never heard athletes confess, "I am just a follower. Leadership is just not for me." We all want to lead. Volumes have been written on leadership, but very little has been written on followership. You know, the art and skill of being a great follower.

Followership is the beginning of leadership. The best competitors have mastered the art of following. Following means intentionally watching, learning from and imitating others. You observe those who are walking in a manner worthy of the Lord, who live with humility and courage, who exhibit integrity and compassion, who make wise decisions, and then you choose to follow in their footsteps. Paul, as he followed the example of Jesus, urged other believers to imitate him in 1 Corinthians 11:1, "Follow my example as I follow the example of Christ."

You don't follow others based on championships, title or position but example and influence. Followership starts at the foot of the cross. Pick up our cross daily and follow Him. Remember, when you follow well, you lead well.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: 
Dan Britton serves as the Fellowship of Christian Athletes' Executive Vice President of International Ministry and Training at the National Support Center in Kansas City. He has been on FCA staff since 1991, first serving for 13 years in Virginia and most recently as the Executive V.P. of Ministry Programs. In high school and college, Dan was a standout lacrosse player. He continued his lacrosse career by playing professional indoor lacrosse for four years with the Baltimore Thunder. He has coauthored three books, One Word That Will Change Your Life, WisdomWalks and WisdomWalks SPORTS, and he is the author and editor of eleven FCA books. He still plays and coaches lacrosse and enjoys running marathons. He and his wife Dawn reside in Overland Park, Kansas, with their three children: Kallie, Abby and Elijah. You can e-mail Dan at dan@fca.org. 



---



Sunday, August 30, 2009
10 Ways to be a Great Follower
A long time ago, when I was conducting one of my first management training classes, a crusty old general foreman snarled at me, "Hey kid, maybe you should be teaching my employees how to be better employees, instead of wasting my time".

Since then, I've spent the last 20 + years trying to develop great leaders. There are thousands of books, articles, and courses on how to be better leaders. Yet, after all of this effort, we still seem to have a shortage of leaders and a lot of employees sure seem dissatisfied with their bosses. Sometimes it feels like we're just spitting in the wind.

Well, after all these years, I'm thinking old crusty may have been on to something there. Let's face it; even the most powerful leaders have to answer to someone; so at some point, we all have to be followers. And great leaders can't be great unless they have great followers. Heck, a team of great followers can even make the most average of managers a great leader.

So how about if I stop telling everyone they should be a leader and instead practice what it takes to be a great follower? Here are some things I love to see from my own employees, and have tried to practice with my managers.

1. Keep your manager informed.
Leaders throughout history have made bad decisions based on a lack of information or bad information. Great employees keep their managers abreast of key projects, even if they don't ask. A manager can't recognize and reward if they don't know what their employees are doing. Managers also hate finding out about bad news from someone else. If something happens, like a dissatisfied client, give your manager a heads-up there may be trouble coming their way.

2. Always support your manager behind their backs.
That also means don't criticize your manager behind their backs. For one thing, it's unprofessional. It's also a safe assumption that whatever you say, good or bad, will get back to them.

3. Be good. Damn good.
When an employee consistently delivers extraordinary results, most managers end up giving them more trust and latitude. And when a manager doesn't have to waste their time cleaning up after mistakes or following up, they have more time to spend on vision, strategy, recognition, resource allocation, and other good things that benefit the entire team. Do what you say you're going to do and do it well.

4. Admit your mistakes.
When you make a mistake, admit it. Be accountable; don't make excuses, don't point fingers, and don't act like a victim. Tell your manager what happened, what you're doing to fix it, and what you've learned so that it won't happen again.

5. Be a great peer.
See post, "Would Your Peers Vote for You". Be a team player; be an advocate for them behind their backs. Managers can't stand back-stabbers, and they can sniff it out no matter how subtle you think you're being.

6. Don't bring problems to your manager, bring solutions.
OK, it's a tired cliché, but it's true. Don't delegate upwards.

7. Prioritize your own work.
Great followers never have to ask their managers to help prioritize their work for them. New employees might need to do this – or average employees – but not the great ones. They always seem to know what's important and urgent, and what can wait.

8. Be an optimist.
Everyone loves being around optimists – the positive attitude and energy is contagious. When you're the person who always sees the glass as half-empty, you end up being a real buzz-kill for everyone around you.

9. Embrace change.
Everybody says the love change – as long as the change is their idea. A great follower can see the possibilities in someone else's idea. Be the early adopter; don't be the laggard.

10. Love what you do – or do something else.
If you don't like what you do, it'll show up in your work and attitude. You're not doing yourself, your manager, or your co-workers any favors by hanging on to what you consider to be a lousy job. Life's too short – find something that you can be passionate about.




--


Executive Summary: "The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership" - John Maxwell ::

Not so much a book review, but an 'Executive Summary', a condensing of key ideas… Leadership consultant and former pastor John Maxwell offers twenty one "laws" distilled from his experience as a self-confessed "expert leader".. 

Leadership consultant and former pastor John Maxwell offers twenty one "laws" distilled from his experience as a self-confessed "expert leader."

1. The Law of the lid.
Your leadership is like a lid or a ceiling on your organisation. Your church or business will not rise beyond the level your leadership allows. That's why when a corporation or team needs to be fixed, they fire the leader.

2. The Law of Influence.
Leadership is simply about influencing people. Nothing more, nothing less. The true test of a leader is to ask him to create positive change in an organisation. If you cannot create change, you cannot lead. Being a leader is not about being first, or being an entrepreneur, or being the most knowledgeable, or being a manager. Being a leader is not just holding a leadership position. ("It's not the position that makes a leader, but the leader who makes a position.") Positional leadership especially does not work in volunteer organisations. The very essence of all power to influence lies in getting the other person to participate. "He who thinks he leads , but has no followers, is only taking a walk."

3. The Law of Process.
Leadership is learned over time. And it can be learned. People skills, emotional strength, vision, momentum, and timing are all areas that can and should be learned. Leaders are always learners.

4. The Law of Navigation.
Anyone can steer the ship, but it takes a leader to chart the course. Vision is defined as the ability to see the whole trip before leaving the dock. A leader will also see obstacles before others do. A leader sees more, sees farther, and sees before others. A navigator (leader) listens – he finds out about grassroots level reactions. Navigators balance optimism with realism. Preparation is the key to good navigation. "It's not the size of the project, it's the size of the leader that counts."

5. The Law of E.F. Hutton.
Hutton was America's most influential stock market analyst. When he spoke, everyone listened. When real leaders speak, people automatically listen. Conversely, in any group or church, you can identify the real leaders by looking for those who people listen to. According to Margaret Thatcher, "being in power is like being a lady – if you have to tell people you are, you aren't." (p45) Tips for a Positional leader – like a newly appointed minister – who wants to become a REAL leader… look for the existing real leaders and work to have influence there. Factors involved in being accepted as a new real leader include character, building key relationships, information, intuition, experience, past success. and ability.

6. The Law of Solid Ground.
Trust is the foundation for all effective leadership. When it comes to leadership, there are no shortcuts. Building trust requires competence, connection and character.

7. The Law of Respect.
People naturally follow people stronger than themselves. Even natural leaders tend to fall in behind those who they sense have a higher "leadership quotient" than themselves.

8. The Law of Intuition.
Leaders evaluate everything with a Leadership bias. Leaders see trends, resources and problems, and can read people.

9. The Law of Magnetism.
Leaders attract people like themselves. Who you are is who you attract. (Mmmm… I thought like poles were meant to repel!) Handy hint: "Staff" your weaknesses. If you only attract followers, your organisation will be weak. Work to attract leaders rather than followers if you want to build a truly strong organisation.

10. The Law of Connection.
You must touch the heart before you ask people to follow. Communicate on the level of emotion first to make a personal connection.

11. The Law of the Inner Circle.
A leader's potential is determined by those closest to him. "The leader finds greatness in the group, and helps the members find it in themselves." (p113)

12. The Law of Empowerment.
Only secure leaders give power to others. Mark Twain said, "Great things can happen when you don't care who gets the credit." (p127). Another point to ponder… "Great leaders gain authority by giving it away."

13. The Law of Reproduction.
It takes a leader to raise up a leader. Followers can't do it, and neither can institutional programs "It takes one to know one, to show one, to grow one." The potential of an organisation depends on the growth of its leadership.

14. The Law of Buy-In.
People buy in to the leader first, then the vision. If they don't like the leader but like the vision, they get a new leader. If they don't like the leader or the vision, they get a new leader. If they don't like the vison but like the leader, they get a new vision.

15. The Law of Victory.
Leaders find a way for the team to win. "You can't win WITHOUT good athletes, but you CAN lose with them." p162). Unity of vision, diversity of skills plus a leader are needed for a win.

16. The Law of Momentum.
You can't steer a ship that isn't moving forward. It takes a leader to create forward motion.

17. The Law of Priorities.
Activity is not necessarily accomplishment. We need to learn the difference. "A leader is the one who climbs the tallest tree, surveys the entire situation, and yells "Wrong Jungle!"" (p176) If you are a leader, you must learn the three "Rs"... a) what's Required b) what gives the greatest Return c) what brings the greatest Reward.

18. The Law of Sacrifice.
A leader must give up to go up. Successful leaders must maintain an attitude of sacrifice to turn around an organisation. One sacrifice seldom brings success. As he worked to turn around the Chrysler Corporation, Lee Iacocca slashed his own salary to $1 per year."When you beome a leader, you lose the right to think about yourself."

19. The Law of Timing.
When to lead is as important as what to do and where to go. Only the right action at the right time will bring success.

20. The Law of Explosive Growth.
To add growth, lead followers. To multiply growth, lead leaders. "It is my job to build the people who are going to build the company."

21. The Law of Legacy.
A leader's lasting value is measured by succession. "Leadership is the one thing you can't delegate. You either exercise it – or abdicate it."

REFLECTIONS

This is a book with some valuable practical insights. John Maxwell, a former senior pastor and now a management consultant, has spent much of his working life reading and researching the essential features of leadership. But don't be misled – while Maxwell offers practical insights, there is very little biblical material involved. This is a book that sits on the shelves of Christian bookshops only by virtue of Maxwell's publishing connections.







The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: By y John C. Maxwell-AUDIOBOOK



Saturday, August 31, 2013

What Parents Should Say as Their Kids Perform - Tim Elmore



H/T to Mrs. TheSlav for sending this and it bears repeating. At the Olympic level recent studies have documented that for those who rise to the highest levels, maintaining a continued positive and supportive role is one of the keys to development.

And it helps the participants to experience what many on the outside would view as an enviable and enjoyable ride.  

The Six Simple Words and the before and after competition statements are excellent. Not a word about winning or losing, issues the coach may or should be involved in, individual plays that did or didn't work out.

Good stuff.

from Growing Leaders with Tim Elmore:
What Parents Should Say as Their Kids Perform - Tim Elmore:

In my work at Growing Leaders, we enjoy the privilege of serving numerous NCAA and professional sports teams each year. After meeting with hundreds of coaches and athletes, I noticed an issue kept surfacing in our conversations. Both the student-athlete and the coach were trying to solve the same problem.  What was that problem?
The parents of the student-athletes.
- See more at: http://growingleaders.com/blog/what-parents-should-say-as-their-kids-perform/#sthash.AmOxZ9q7.dpuf
What we parents may not recognize is the pressure and angst this kind of involvement applies. May I tell you what student-athletes are telling me?

I love my mom, but when she does this, I get the feeling she doesn’t trust me.

My parents are great, but I feel like I have multiple coaches telling me what to do and I get stressed out over it.

I’m getting blackballed by my teammates because my mother keeps texting me and my coach, to give suggestions. I wish she would chill.

I feel like I’m never quite good enough; I can never fully please my parents.


What We Should Say When Our Kids Perform
The most liberating words parents can speak to their student-athletes are quite simple. Based on psychological research, the three healthiest statements moms and dads can make as they perform are:
Before the Competition:                                    After the competition:
  1. Have fun.                                                    1. Did you have fun?
  2. Play hard.                                                    2. I’m proud of you.
  3. I love you.                                                    3. I love you.
Six Simple Words…
- See more at: http://growingleaders.com/blog/what-parents-should-say-as-their-kids-perform/#sthash.AmOxZ9q7.dpuf

'via Blog this'

Sunday, May 19, 2013

TWTW!! Maybe Hawk Harrelson has it right



After listening to the recent debate between the Hawk and ESPN's Brian Kenney (YouTube below), I couldn't help but think that maybe the Hawk has a point, maybe two. Whether you call it TWTW or GRIT or whatever, intangibles are a quality that by definition do not lend themselves to being quantified by definition, but you know them when you see them.

from thefreedictionary.com:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/intangible
3.intangible - hard to pin down or identify; "an intangible feeling of impending disaster"
unidentifiable - impossible to identify
Some guys have that quality of making the other guys around them better. They make the total of the team greater than the sum of its parts. They are leaders and chemistry builders. And some guys are the opposite.

Winners have the intangibles!!! And like many things, you don't appreciate what you've got until after it's gone. Then you realize the hard to quantify value-added that these guys provide after they are missing from the equation. Then the team is equal to ( mediocrity ) or maybe even less than the sum of its parts ( under-achievers ).  Of course, then it's too late.

That's what Hawk is trying to explain to the geek squad here, IMO.

from The Big Lead:



The first example that came to my mind was Tim Tebow in 2011 with Denver.

Artistically, not a QB work of art.
Statistically, not a work of art.
But his teams win consistently.

It took the Jets to break the streak and that says more about the Jets than it does Tebow.  The Jets have been
a cesspool of bad personnel decisions and Tebow was supposed to come in and be the team plunger how?
By holding a clipboard?

Anyway, I thought I would take a look at the 2011 year in quarterbacking in the NFL and began with the
premise that the better the QB statistically, the better the teams record would be.

So,  I wanted to see the correlation between the ESPN total QB rating and winning.

In addition, I wanted to see if there were any examples like Tebow of QB's who violated the statistical model,
so to speak. Who won sometimes in spite of their liabilities as a QB as defined by the statistical metric.
They were "bad" QB's who just won ball games.

Here is the metric and how they determine the QB rating.

There were some interesting results (shown below).

from ESPN:

Glossary

  • * Season Leaders: On pace for 250 action plays.
  • * All-time data reflects 2008 onwards.
  • PASS EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added on plays with pass attempts.
  • RUN EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added through scrambles, designed rushes and fumbles/fumble returns on running plays.
  • SACK EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added (lost) on sacks.
  • PEN EPA: Clutch-weighted expected points added on penalties.
  • TOTAL EPA: Total clutch-weighted expected points added.
  • ACT PLAYS: Plays on which the QB has a non-zero expected points contribution. Includes most plays

  • that are not handoffs.
  • QB PAR: Number of points contributed by a quarterback over the season, accounting for QBR and

  • how much he plays, above the level of a quarterback who plays very rarely and is on the fringe of the NFL.
  • QB PAA: Number of points contributed by a quarterback over the season, accounting for QBR and how much he plays, above the level of an average quarterback.
  • TOTAL QBR: Total Quarterback Rating, which values quarterback on all play types on a 0-to-100 scale.


A quick primer on the fundamentals of Total Quarterback Rating:
Scoring: 0-100, from low to high. An average QB would be at 50.
Win Probability: All QB plays are scored based on how much they contribute to a win. By determining expected point totals for almost any situation, Total QBR is able to apply points to a quarterback based on every type of play he would be involved in.
Dividing Credit: Total QBR factors in such things as overthrows, underthrows, yards after the catch and more to accurately determine how much a QB contributes to each play.
Clutch Index: How critical a certain play is based on when it happens in a game is factored into the score.

For the W-L data for each QB, I used CBS Sports NFL data. The W-L data includes only games where the
QB started and includes playoff games if the team advanced that far. (TWTW)

from CBSSports.com:



The correlation between the Total QBR and the QB winning percentage (W_Pct) as a starter was 0.64.

No surprise, the NFL is a QB driven league nowadays.

Based on this small sample, the correlation number implies that about 40% of a teams winning percentage is
derived from the play of their quarterback.


The first thing that jumps out are the names at the top of the list are WINNERS. The creme de la creme of
the NFL. Aaron Rogers, Drew Brees, Tom Brady, Tony Romo and Matt Ryan are the top five and win at
about the rate that their stellar play implies

The bottom of the list gives us Blaine Gabbert, Curtis Painter, Sam Bradford, Tim Tebow and Mark Sanchez.
Painter and Gabbert won at about the level of play their QBR would indicate. Sam Bradford seemed to just
have one of those miserable season where everything went wrong for him and his team. But Tebow and Sanchez
both out kicked their coverage so to speak.

Sanchez had a QBR of 33.6 and an W_Pct of 50.0% for a plus 16.40 score.
Tebow came in with a 29.9 QBr and a W_Pct of 61.5% for a plus 31.64 score.

The list of over-achievers, possessing dare I say TWTW, were:

John Skelton @ +39.90
Alex Smith @ +31.98
Tim Tebow @ +31.64
Mark Sanchez @ +16.40
Joe Flacco @ +12.52
Tom Brady @ +10.63
Jay Cutler @ +10.20

The interesting name on the list was Skelton who out-performed a more highly regarded QB in Kevin Kolb
( 34.4 QBR - 33.33 W_Pct) for the same Arizona Cardinal team. Apparently, Skelton may have had had
that je ne sais quoi, the TWTW that Hawk is alluding to and he was able to rally the team around him as
Tebow did the Broncos in relief of Kyle Orton.

Skelton and Tebow are interesting because they took over the same team, with the same defensive squad
and rallied them from depths to heights. That result defines what Hawk is speaking about. We're just not
certain how to identify it in advance, but we can generally spot it after the fact pretty well.

The rest of the overachiever names you can generally say had good to excellent defensive teams around
them. How much of the teams performance can be attributed to good defense and how much of the
defensive performance is aided by good QB play (keeping them off the field, playing from ahead more
often than from behind, etc.) is fodder for another post.

Hindsight and many forms of statistical analysis are always 20/20.  I think that is the Hawk's frustration
with the SABR crowd and it is well placed in some instances.

Looking at the other end of the scale, the under-achievers yields some interesting names. These guys
QBR was significantly higher than their team record for whatever reason. Maybe they were stat
gatherers and not team motivators. maybe they were on bad teams.

 Kyle Orton @ -29.80
Tony Romo @ -21.40
Josh Freeman @ -18.63
Sam Bradford @ -18.60
Carson Palmer @ -18.16
Matt Schaub @ -17.50
Cam Newton @ -17.50

Some of these guys were on good teams, with good defenses, soooooooooo.......IDK.

Lets just say I would score this one in favor of Hawk Harrelson over Brian Kenney
and Harold Reynolds by a TKO.
STOP THE FIGHT!!

And they can roll their eyes and snicker amongst themselves all they want.







TWTW
Total QBR W-L W_Pct W_Pct Diff Player
86.2    15-2 88.2%        88.24        2.04 Aaron Rodgers
84.0            14-4 77.8%        77.78       (6.22) Drew Brees
72.7       15-3 83.3%        83.33      10.63 Tom Brady
71.4      8-8 50.0%        50.00     (21.40) Tony Romo
69.1    10-6 62.5%        62.50       (6.60) Matt Ryan
67.5             5-5 50.0%        50.00     (17.50) Matt Schaub
65.5    10-6 62.5%        62.50       (3.00) Matt Stafford
64.4      7-6 53.8%        53.85     (10.55) Michael Vick
63.6    11-5 68.8%        68.75        5.15 Ben Roethlisberger
62.8      9-7 56.3%        56.25       (6.55) Matt Hasselbeck
62.7      8-8 50.0%        50.00     (12.70) Philip Rivers
62.6      4-5 44.4%        44.44     (18.16) Carson Palmer
59.8      7-3 70.0%        70.00      10.20 Jay Cutler
59.7    13-5 72.2%        72.22      12.52 Joe Flacco
59.4    12-7 54.5%        54.55       (4.85) Eli Manning
56.6      6-6 50.0%        50.00       (6.60) Matt Moore
55.0    6-10 37.5%        37.50     (17.50) Cam Newton
51.2      4-5 44.4%        44.44       (6.76) Matt Cassell
50.5    6-10 37.5%        37.50     (13.00) Ryan Fitzpatrick
49.8      1-4 20.0%        20.00     (29.80) Kyle Orton
45.8      9-7 56.3%        56.25      10.45 Andy Dalton
45.8    14-4 77.8%        77.78      31.98 Alex Smith
45.3    4-11 26.7%        26.67     (18.63) Josh Freeman
43.9      5-8 38.5%        38.46       (5.44) Rex Grossman
40.1      4-9 30.8%        30.77       (9.33) Colt McCoy
37.7      7-8 46.7%        46.67        8.97 Tarvaris Jackson
35.1      6-2 75.0%        75.00      39.90 John Skelton
34.4      3-6 33.3%        33.33       (1.07) Kevin Kolb
33.7      2-9 18.2%        18.18     (15.52) Christian Ponder
33.6      8-8 50.0%        50.00      16.40 Mark Sanchez
29.9      8-5 61.5%        61.54      31.64 Tim Tebow
28.6      1-9 10.0%        10.00     (18.60) Sam Bradford
22.5    2-12 14.3%        14.29       (8.21) Curtis Painter
20.6    4-11 26.7%        26.67        6.07 Blaine Gabbert
0.641328597   Correl OBR - W_Pct
 GUILFORD’S SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION FOR CORRELATION COEFFICIENT VALUES
Value  Interpretation
Less than .20    Less than .20 Slight, almost negligible relationship
.20 - .40  .20 - .40 Low correlation; definite but small relationship
.40 - .70  .40 - .70 Moderate correlation; substantial relationship
.70 - .90  .70 - .90 High correlation; marked relationship
.90 - 1.00  .90 – 1.00 Very high correlation; very dependable relationship

Giants Top Minor League Prospects

  • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
  • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
  • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
  • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
  • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
  • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
  • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
  • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
  • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
  • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
  • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
  • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
  • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
  • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

  • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
  • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
  • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
  • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
  • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

  • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
  • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
  • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
  • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
  • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.