This is the difference between the great ones and the really, really great ones. Making those smaller, incremental changes and improvements to your game after you are already acknowledged as being great at your craft. When all is said and done, Posey should rank among the greatest catchers in the history of the game. He already has to rank as the greatest in Giants history.
Selective aggression. I like it as a hitting approach.
from Beyond the Box Score:
Buster Posey becomes selectively aggressive
In many regards, Posey's offense hasn't differed much from before, and some areas have actually declined. He's taken an unintentional walk in 7.2 percent of his plate appearances, a slight downgrade from his career mark of 7.9 percent. His BABIP has risen marginally, from .329 overall to .334 in 2015, but losses in power negate any benefit of that: He's seen his ISO drop to a all-time low of .159, sizably below the .175 standard he's set for himself. How, then, has he posted a better wRC+ in 2015 (145) than for his career (142)?
It's simple —he's gone down on strikes less often. And by less often, I mean waaay less often:
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4041738/PoseyK.0.png)
Unlike many other formidable hitters, he's never piled up a ton of strikeouts, but this year has been something else entirely. Only two other qualified players in the NL best his 8.8 percent strikeout rate, and suffice to say that Daniel Murphy and Andrelton Simmonsdon't hit the ball as hard as Posey does. This combination of very few strikeouts and superb results when making contact has once again made Posey an elite contributor with the bat.
When most fans (myself included) notice that a player has cut down on his strikeouts, they immediately assume that he's whiffed less often. Interestingly enough, that hasn't applied to Posey. At 6.6 percent, his current swinging strike rate matches his career 6.9 percent figure. Thus, his reduction in strikeouts has come from his rate of looking strikes, which have fallen to a career-low 15.2 percent of the pitches he's seen. Posey has paired his already-elite contact ability with a newfound sense of aggression, resulting in a dramatically decreased strikeout rate.
Perhaps most impressively, Posey has retained his discipline at the plate. As his Z-Swing% has climbed nearly eight percentage points relative to career marks, his O-Swing% has increased by less than half that:
| Year(s) | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | Zone% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 28.8% | 69.6% | 46.9% |
| Career | 26.1% | 61.8% | 49.0% |
The opposition has begun to pitch around Posey to a greater extent, further aiding him in his quest to avoid the K. This sort of disparity in offering at pitches doesn't come around too often. Among qualified NL hitters, only four — Posey, McCutchen, Kris Bryant, andJhonny Peralta — own an O-Swing% below 30 percent and a Z-Swing% above 69 percent. Plus, the latter three names have each swung and missed more than the league average, so Posey's ability to make bat meet ball further sets him apart. His aberrationally low strikeout rate has some equally unusual skill behind it.
Sent from my iPhone
Last April, Astros manager Bo Porter was asked about the secret behind his team's hot hitting during a three-game winning streak. "Selective aggression," he said. And last October, before NLCS Game Six, Pete Kozma was asked to explain the Cardinals' season-long offensive success. (All of the good hitters must have been busy.) His response: "selective aggression." Spring or fall, worst team or best, the answer was often the same. Selective aggression was what every offense strove for.
So what does it mean?
"To me, [it means] you swing at a high percentage of strikes but rarely chase out of the zone," says one pro scout. "A selectively aggressive hitter is a dude who won't often chase out of the zone but isn't afraid to hack at the 0-0 get-me-over fastball."
It's hard not to like the sound of that, which is why "selective aggression" has become a cliché. So which hitters best embody the selective/aggressive approach, and which haven't gotten the hang of it?
Just for fun, I decided to look for the most and least selectively aggressive hitters in the majors last season by comparing each player's in-zone and out-of-zone swing rates from our Batter Plate Discipline report (derived from PITCHf/x) and sorting for the greatest discrepancies. And I really do mean just for fun, since this isn't much use from an analytical perspective. The ratio of Z-Swing Rate to O-Swing rate is only weakly correlated with offensive production, as measured by TAv (r=-.19, from 2008-13), and it's hardly any more closely correlated than O-Swing rate alone (r=-.16). Hitters who are selectively aggressive tend to be better than those who aren't, but the connection is tenuous, maybe because swing rates alone tell us little about how often the swings make contact, or how high-quality that contact is. You or I might be selectively aggressive, but we would still be bad at major league baseball.
There are other problems with Z-Swing:O-Swing ratio as a stat, namely that we're smushing together two different denominators (pitches in the zone and pitches out of the zone) and we're assuming that all pitches in the zone should be swung at, which obviously isn't the case. (On a 3-0 count, for instance, it makes sense to take the strike on the corner and hope the pitcher comes in on 3-1.) But because this exercise is silly in concept, it bothers me less that it's somewhat silly in execution. Sometimes silliness is what we want.
Here are the 2013 swing rate baselines for non-pitchers, just so we're all on the same page:
Zone Rate
|
Swing Rate
|
Z-Swing Rate
|
O-Swing Rate
|
Z-Swing:O-Swing Ratio
|
49.5%
|
46.2%
|
63.2%
|
29.6%
|
2.14
|
The average batter gets a pitch in the zone almost exactly half the time and swings at slightly less than half of the pitches he sees. He swings at over 60 percent of pitches in the zone and chases just under 30 percent of pitches that would be (or should be) balls. The average ratio of zone swing rate to out-of-zone swing rate, then, is just over 2:1.
If we sort 2013 batters with a minimum of 800 pitches seen (approximately 200 plate appearances) in descending order of Z-Swing:O-Swing ratio, Josh Satin comes out on top, at 4.05. (In other words, Satin swings at pitches in the strike zone four times more often than he swings at pitches out of the zone.) Here's what Satin's normalized swing rate by location looks like:
A blue box means that Satin swings less often in that area than the typical right-handed hitter; the brighter the blue, the less often he swings relative to the norm. Red indicates an above-average rate. Satin has only a single red box, and then only barely.
Satin's 34.5 percent swing rate last season was the lowest in baseball, and his reluctance to take the bat off his shoulder extended to offerings inside the strike zone. He swung at pitches inside the zone only 85 percent as often as the average batter, and he shows up here only because he chased pitches even less often: only 45 percent as often as the average batter. But passive hitters who show different degrees of reluctance to swing depending on location isn't what we're looking for; that's closer to selective selectivity than selective aggression. As the scout says when I mention Satin, "To be selectively aggressive, there has to be aggression in there."
Satin's 34.5 percent swing rate last season was the lowest in baseball, and his reluctance to take the bat off his shoulder extended to offerings inside the strike zone. He swung at pitches inside the zone only 85 percent as often as the average batter, and he shows up here only because he chased pitches even less often: only 45 percent as often as the average batter. But passive hitters who show different degrees of reluctance to swing depending on location isn't what we're looking for; that's closer to selective selectivity than selective aggression. As the scout says when I mention Satin, "To be selectively aggressive, there has to be aggression in there."
So let's add another condition: The player has to have swung at pitches inside the strike zone at a league-average rate. That way we'll get hitters who understand the strike zone and know what pitches to take but don't have "don't swing" as a default setting. Hitters like the following five:
Most Selectively Aggressive
1. Dan Uggla (3.33 ratio)
We tend not to think of guys with league-leading strikeout rates as selective, so Uggla's appearance at the top of this list might surprise you, but the Braves' second baseman had the fourth-lowest chase rate in the big leagues. His problem was an inability to make contact, no matter where the pitch was. Only teammate B.J. Upton and American Leaguers Mike Napoli and Mark Reynolds missed more often when they swung inside the zone.
Uggla's uppercut produced way too many whiffs and popups en route to a .179 batting average, and a lot of Uggla at-bats looked like this: a close take,
Followed by multiple whiffs within the zone.
On the bright side, Uggla finished the season with a bigger gap between his BA and TAv than any other qualified hitter, thanks to what happened when he occasionally connected (22 homers) and his willingness to lay off pitches he couldn't reach (14.3 percent walk rate) .
2. Chris Iannetta (3.10 ratio)
Iannetta, like Uggla, illustrates both the strengths and weaknesses of the Z-Swing:O-Swing ratio: It hints at his patience and pop but obscures his low average. Iannetta was something of a saber-darling when it seemed like the Rockies were playing Yorvit Torrealba above him because of his batting average. Then his rep took a hit when we discovered what his poor receiving skills were costing his teams—roughly 10 runs a season. When it comes to selective aggression, though, Iannetta is a star: Six of the top 21 selective aggression ratios since 2008 belong to him.
3. Andrew McCutchen (3.07 ratio)
McCutchen has come closer to the "selective aggression" ideal with each passing season.
His O-Swing rate last year was almost exactly what it was as a rookie—significantly below league average—but his Z-Swing rate has risen by over 30 percent. He's much more aggressive than he once was, but all of the swings he's added have been the good kind. And now he's a reigning MVP! Funny how that works.
4. Matt Joyce (3.0 ratio)
Another low-average, high-walk, good-power guy who makes his swings count.
5. Michael Saunders (2.93 ratio)
On Monday, Russell A. Carleton wrote about Saunders' improved swing rate and stats, dubbing him a potential fantasy sleeper. Now we can add the "selective aggression" seal of approval. Unlike McCutchen, Saunders improved his ratio by cutting down dramatically on his swings outside the strike zone, having already upped his Z-Swings in 2012.
Rounding out the top 10: Justin Ruggiano, Dexter Fowler, David Wright, Logan Morrison, Yunel Escobar
Least Selectively Aggressive
1. Charlie Blackmon (1.56 ratio)
That's not the distribution of swing rates that one wants to see. "Blackmon's got one of the highest swing rates in the league, and despite healthy walk rates in the minors has never topped 4 percent in a big league season," we wrote in the annual, adding, "…he'll have to show he can lay off inside fastballs, outside changeups and breaking balls at his shoetops if he's to carry his success into 2014." Here's a representative sequence, in which Blackmon swings at three pitches outside of the strike one, takes one over the plate for a strike, and pops out.
Swing rates stabilize quickly, but Blackmon's season was just over 250 plate appearances, a small enough sample to have some hope.
2. A.J. Pierzynski (1.60 ratio)
2. A.J. Pierzynski (1.60 ratio)
Pierzynski's normalized swing chart is almost perfect in its imperfection, the red boxes ringing the blue in precisely the opposite pattern of what we would expect to see from a selectively aggressive hitter. Pierzynski's O-Swing rate rose over four percentage points to lead the league last season.
3. Freddy Galvis (1.61 ratio)
From the left side on the left, and from the right side on the right:
Not selectively aggressive from either side!
4. Starling Marte (1.62 ratio)
R.J. Anderson wrote about Marte's worrisome sense of the strike zone a year ago, and both his O-Swing and Z-Swing rose last season. As far as Marte is concerned, the outside corner is infinite.
5. Jeff Francoeur (1.62 ratio)
Naturally.
Rounding out the bottom 10: Jeff Bianchi, Adam Jones, Nolan Arenado, Ichiro Suzuki, Howie Kendrick
How about the most and least selectively aggressive hitters of the past six seasons?
Most Selectively Aggressive: Chris Iannetta, 2009 (3.83)
As mentioned, Iannetta is a selective aggression stud. He doesn't know how to steal a strike behind the plate, but he knows what one looks like when he's hitting.
Four of the top 20 selective aggressions seasons since '08 are by Chipper Jones, who had an excellent eye when he wasn't being distracted by Boog Sciambi.
Least Selectively Aggressive: Pedro Ciriaco, 2012 (1.45)
Remember that partial 2012 season when Ciriaco batted .293? Judging by his approach that year, his .224/.279/.336 line in 2013 was much more representative. Ciriaco's 45.4 percent O-Swing rate in 2012 led the majors: he swung high, he swung low, and he swung outside. The only place he didn't swung was right down the middle. (Jeff Sullivan GIF'd a good three-pitch Ciriaco sequence at the time, here, here, and here.)
The three names between Ciriaco and Blackmon (who has the fifth-lowest ratio in the dataset) are ones you would expect: Miguel Olivo, Alfonso Soriano, and Mark Trumbo.
So, selective aggression! Now you know.
No comments:
Post a Comment