Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Pay to Play challenged by ACLU



This is an interesting and potentially very troubling development to say the least.

Now, it goes without saying that I am fundamentally against these "pay to play" fees that are being assessed as part of the athletic programs at high schools across the country. They make participation in these programs out of reach for low-income families. You set up a tiered system of "scholarship" and "non-scholarship" athletes at the high-school level. They chase people out and make participation in sports at the public high schools into a "country-club" activity for the elite and the affluent only.

So why would I be against the involvement in the ACLU to overturn these fees in Rhode Island?

http://www.projo.com/news/content/ACLU_SPORTS_FEES_12-22-09_N4GSEH2_v22.5d18.html?referer=d1a38dbaf3c5c3b7d2fad43e9b99a392

The school system’s policy of charging middle and high school athletes a fee to play interscholastic sports is against the law and should be thrown out, the Rhode Island Affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union charged Monday.

The ACLU said it will ask the state Department of Education to declare the policy “null, void and unlawful,” to refund any fees paid and to destroy any applications for waivers of the fees the School Department may have received.

The ACLU said the Department of Education had ruled — at least five times before in similar cases — that charging fees for sports was illegal and that poor families should not have to seek a charitable waiver for their children to play for their schools’ sports teams.

School Committee Chairman Robert E. Lafleur said Monday he had not seen the complaint and couldn’t comment specifically, but he added that the the committee believed the policy as approved could withstand a legal challenge.

“We feel comfortable and confident with the policy that is in place,” he said.


It's easy. You can see where this will go as easy as I can.

What happens in Rhode Island in this case--contrary to what happens in Las Vegas-- does not stay in Rhode Island. It spreads quickly and virulently across the country.

If the ACLU does succeed in this case, what will be the result? The costs will be back in the school system's lap and as we well know, the first thing these public school administrators will cut is extra-curricular activities of ALL KINDS. NOT JUST SPORTS.

They don't go after their own corpulent bureaucracy. They go after sports, and the band, and the drama club, and the chess club.....and on and on.


When plans for the fee were first announced last summer, the Rhode Island Interscholastic League asked the state for an advisory opinion on its legality. At that time, Commissioner of Education Deborah A. Gist said state law forbids districts to charge student athletes fees as a way to finance sports programs

Gist wrote that “except in a very few cases, the General Assembly has not granted school committees the authority to charge fees for school services.”

The system set up by the School Committee sets a $150 per-athlete per-sport fee, with a seasonal cap of $275 for families with more than one athlete playing in a given season. No family can be charged more than $550 for the entire school year.

Families may also seek waivers based on income or request one even if their income exceeds the criteria. The School Department has said no student would be denied a spot on a roster because of non-payment.

The ACLU argued that regardless of the committee’s decision not to enforce the policy, it remains in effect and therefore should be challenged and invalidated.

The money raised by charging the middle and high school interscholastic athlete athletes was intend intended to cover the approximately $40,000 it costs to run the school system’s sports programs. As of October, it had only raised about a tenth of that amount.


I suppose they could just change their state law and throw it back in the school's lap but the residual damage of CYA will have been done. Many of these administrators do not see any inherent value in these programs anyway, which is staggering considering that they are in the business of providing a well-rounded education. They will take a deep breath regardless of where this ends up and take the path of least resistance.

THAT'S WHAT COWARDS DO!!!

No comments:

Giants Top Minor League Prospects

  • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
  • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
  • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
  • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
  • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
  • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
  • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
  • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
  • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
  • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
  • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
  • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
  • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
  • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

  • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
  • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
  • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
  • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
  • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

  • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
  • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
  • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
  • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
  • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.