Friday, May 12, 2017

Six Steps for Effective Questioning | Coach Dave Piggott

Brad_Stevens_talking_with_AJ_Graves
Good stuff and once again a very good resource for learning the craft of coaching.

SIX STEPS FOR EFFECTIVE QUESTIONING

Ever since Socrates first interrogated the young people of Athens back around 420BC, question-based pedagogy has been a cornerstone of teaching methodology in the west.

However, the idea that questions facilitate effective learning is more ideology than science. Don't get me wrong: many books have been written on the value of questions; Ofsted suggest questions are a feature of 'outstanding' teaching; and many coaches attest to the power and value of asking rather than showing and telling. Yet good teaching and coaching must involve a mix of communication behaviours. The question, therefore, is not whether or not to use questions, but when? And under what circumstances? And how to use them with greatest effect?

This article attempts to answer these questions and offer a simple methodology for coaches of all levels interested in enhancing their questioning repertoire.

When are questions most useful?

There's a time and a place to deploy most coaching behaviours. I like to use questions a lot – actually, 25% of the time according to my last video review – but not in a two-minute time-out at the end of a game with the result on the line. There are also researchers who suggest that some forms of skill learning happen best when done "implicitly" (i.e. specifically without concious thought). So, when should we use questions, and when should they be avoided? My answer, based on my knowledge of the research on learning, would be that it depends on your objective:

Screenshot 2014-09-06 at 17.44.36
I will use the example of teaching a basketball jump shot here to illustrate the point. My approach is sequential, and involves a range of approaches:
  1. First, I want to examine the role of the shot in the game – when and where we might want to shoot (tactical stuff) – so I use games and questions to draw attention to this.
  2. Once this has been understood, and players are making good decisions about shooting and doing so happily, I want to improve their technique. The physical principles of good shooting are well known – a release angle between 50-55 degrees, for example, leads to optimal angle of entry, increasing margin for error – so I don't need to allow the players to discover this them for themselves. It would be a waste of time. So I 'show and tell' and allow lots of repetitive practice. Very traditional!
  3. Finally, knowing that each player will be most comfortable with slight variations on the standard technique, I may use questions again to draw their attention to small differences to help them build confidence in their own form; to notice deviations and to self-correct if necessary.
The point, of course, is to use the appropriate behaviour to meet the objectives. I often come across coaches who declare blind allegiance to one extreme or the other. Both are wrong.

How can you make the most of questions?

Having chosen the right time and place to use questions – e.g. in a session aimed at understanding when and where to use a jump shot – you are ready to consider your method. With twenty years' experience, and being lucky enough to study this for my job (I have used Walsh & Sattes' book and also Lynn Kidman's work), I've come up with a six-stage process that I think leads to good results: The Six Ps.

Just a couple of warnings before I start: first, it's important not to expect an instant response, especially if your athletes are used to being ordered around; second, it's worth remembering that this strategy is an ideal type, and you may not always make use of all six steps.
Screenshot 2014-09-06 at 18.22.08
To explain, a question must first be linked to the PURPOSE of the session. In my example, I may start by planning to ask: "when is it a good time to use a jump shot?".
I would then PRIME the group by asking the question, but without expecting a response. The idea is to give them something to focus on.

The next step is difficult: I need to design a game or activity that requires the players to solve the problem posed by the question. They have to PLAY a game that poses the question, over and over. During play, I can remind them of the question without stopping things. It is also really important to observe carefully and look out for 'teachable moments': those instances when you see someone answer the question emphatically in their play (e.g. seeing a player catch and shoot quickly when open).

I would use this moment to pause the session and PRESENT the question again, this time looking for an answer. The important thing here is to give learners an equal chance to respond. One way of doing this is to ask the question, then allow them to group off and discuss answers for 30 seconds or so. I can then ask for a response from each group in turn without the social pressure of giving a "wrong" answer (it's a group answer, not a personal one).

The real skill of questioning, then, lies in your ability to PROBE responses. This requires practice, patience, active listening skills (nodding, make approving noises) and an understanding of where you want to go with the question (back to the purpose). Another important consideration here is to allow a little thinking time. Coaches are often uncomfortable with silence and often "rescue" the situation by jumping back in to answer their own questions. This urge has to be resisted. If a Q&A session has been conducted well, it will have lasted a few minutes, with a few lines of discussion explored (e.g. good places on the court to shoot; good situations to shoot; where players are confident shooting from etc.), so it's important to conclude with a recap and refocus on the key messages.

The final step, then, is to PROGRESS the question. This could be a simple link into the skill refinement session (can you get your feet set earlier?), or a challenge to individual players in a progressed game (can you get more shots away before getting closed down?). Whatever the case, there needs to be both connection and extension.

Summary

I have tried to suggest that questions can be useful tools to enhance learning in certain situations; but they're not a panacea. If you want to use questions, think carefully about why they might be useful. And if you decide to go ahead, it's worth doing it properly: planning the question carefully, linking it to your objective, and following the 6 Ps to success! And if you have any questions, please use the comment box below…


Sent from my iPhone

No comments:

Giants Top Minor League Prospects

  • 1. Joey Bart 6-2, 215 C Power arm and a power bat, playing a premium defensive position. Good catch and throw skills.
  • 2. Heliot Ramos 6-2, 185 OF Potential high-ceiling player the Giants have been looking for. Great bat speed, early returns were impressive.
  • 3. Chris Shaw 6-3. 230 1B Lefty power bat, limited defensively to 1B, Matt Adams comp?
  • 4. Tyler Beede 6-4, 215 RHP from Vanderbilt projects as top of the rotation starter when he works out his command/control issues. When he misses, he misses by a bunch.
  • 5. Stephen Duggar 6-1, 170 CF Another toolsy, under-achieving OF in the Gary Brown mold, hoping for better results.
  • 6. Sandro Fabian 6-0, 180 OF Dominican signee from 2014, shows some pop in his bat. Below average arm and lack of speed should push him towards LF.
  • 7. Aramis Garcia 6-2, 220 C from Florida INTL projects as a good bat behind the dish with enough defensive skill to play there long-term
  • 8. Heath Quinn 6-2, 190 OF Strong hitter, makes contact with improving approach at the plate. Returns from hamate bone injury.
  • 9. Garrett Williams 6-1, 205 LHP Former Oklahoma standout, Giants prototype, low-ceiling, high-floor prospect.
  • 10. Shaun Anderson 6-4, 225 RHP Large frame, 3.36 K/BB rate. Can start or relieve
  • 11. Jacob Gonzalez 6-3, 190 3B Good pedigree, impressive bat for HS prospect.
  • 12. Seth Corry 6-2 195 LHP Highly regard HS pick. Was mentioned as possible chip in high profile trades.
  • 13. C.J. Hinojosa 5-10, 175 SS Scrappy IF prospect in the mold of Kelby Tomlinson, just gets it done.
  • 14. Garett Cave 6-4, 200 RHP He misses a lot of bats and at times, the plate. 13 K/9 an 5 B/9. Wild thing.

2019 MLB Draft - Top HS Draft Prospects

  • 1. Bobby Witt, Jr. 6-1,185 SS Colleyville Heritage HS (TX) Oklahoma commit. Outstanding defensive SS who can hit. 6.4 speed in 60 yd. Touched 97 on mound. Son of former major leaguer. Five tool potential.
  • 2. Riley Greene 6-2, 190 OF Haggerty HS (FL) Florida commit.Best HS hitting prospect. LH bat with good eye, plate discipline and developing power.
  • 3. C.J. Abrams 6-2, 180 SS Blessed Trinity HS (GA) High-ceiling athlete. 70 speed with plus arm. Hitting needs to develop as he matures. Alabama commit.
  • 4. Reece Hinds 6-4, 210 SS Niceville HS (FL) Power bat, committed to LSU. Plus arm, solid enough bat to move to 3B down the road. 98MPH arm.
  • 5. Daniel Espino 6-3, 200 RHP Georgia Premier Academy (GA) LSU commit. Touches 98 on FB with wipe out SL.

2019 MLB Draft - Top College Draft Prospects

  • 1. Adley Rutschman C Oregon State Plus defender with great arm. Excellent receiver plus a switch hitter with some pop in the bat.
  • 2. Shea Langliers C Baylor Excelent throw and catch skills with good pop time. Quick bat, uses all fields approach with some pop.
  • 3. Zack Thompson 6-2 LHP Kentucky Missed time with an elbow issue. FB up to 95 with plenty of secondary stuff.
  • 4. Matt Wallner 6-5 OF Southern Miss Run producing bat plus mid to upper 90's FB closer. Power bat from the left side, athletic for size.
  • 5. Nick Lodolo LHP TCU Tall LHP, 95MPH FB and solid breaking stuff.